The injustices of the judges
The worst enemy of justice, too often, on the contrary, it is those who should enforce the law. An all-Italian short circuit that fills the pages of newspapers every day and which puts the need for a drastic reform of the entire judicial system back at the center. It wouldn't be enough, Indeed, sweep them away decriminalizations wanted by Matteo Renzi to solve a problem that is now colossal and which has names and surnames, that is, those of magistrates who sign absurd sentences.
How is this possible, for example, that a pusher Tunisian, caught with kilos of hashish, marijuana, coca ed ecstasy, was immediately released after declaring that he was dealing "out of necessity" having "lost his job" and not knowing how to make ends meet? Or how is that possible the Court of Appeal of Ancona did not recognize it rape of a girl because this one "looks like a boy"? Or how is that possible to a murderer the sentence has been served Why, according to the magistrate, would have "acted as a reaction to the behavior" of the victim? Each of these judges will defend themselves by guaranteeing that they have interpreted the law in the best possible way. But who defends us from certain absurd regulations or from the do-goodism of certain robes? Too often, Indeed, the victims risk paying (or to die) twice. Read More
by Roberto PECCHIOLI
Vladimir Putin he was first elected president in 2000. In 18 years, the economy of the Russian Federation has changed drastically and for the better. This is demonstrated by the data published on 
(MB: E’ something deeper than “de-globalization”. Secondo Gideon Rachman, in yesterday's Financial Times, if the 19th century popularized the idea of the 'nation-state', the 21st century could be, Instead, the century of the 'civilization-state'. “A civilization-state is a country that claims to represent not just a historical territory or a particular language or ethnic group, but a civilization...
Of Alexandr Dugin
Therefore Rai is starting to change its face. On the contrary, to change his soul to tell the truth. According to the lines traced by the Foa-Salini couple ( president and CEO) with their editorial plan, approved by a majority of the board of directors, the public broadcaster will have a plethora of controllers guarding an army of controlled people. With one great result: pluralism will be just a mere fiction. Viale Mazzini, as has never happened in the past, will act as a sounding board for the government majority, even going beyond the concept of the positive narrative evoked, and request, at the time by Renzi. Today the ghost of single thought seems to be at work, to the point of making one regret the subdivision. With quotas there was at least some margin for meritocracy. Now that has been reset too. Only two no's against the editorial plan, that of board member Rita Borioni (at a progressive level), but also that of the councilor elected by the employees, Riccardo Laganà. The Plan sends TV channel directors into retirement (like RaiUno, RaiDue, RaiTre). These directors – who will have a Distribution Director above them – they will become simple program coordinators. They won't have the resources to buy and produce broadcasts. In the new setup, the programs will have to fish inside them 9 new Content Directions. These will have the economic budget and decision-making power – will be dedicated to entertainment (prime time, day time and cultural), to TV series, all fiction, to documentaries, to the boys, to experimental formats, to in-depth journalistic content. In an interview with Repubblica, councilor Rita Borioni reported that the 9 new Content Directions will lead to a multiplication of tasks. And not only that. Entire product chains (from TV series to in-depth journalistic content) they will be under the control of a single person, with potential damage to pluralism. 
Vincezo Marino, key witness in the prosecution against the Nigerian Oseghale, spoke today as a super witness during the second hearing of the trial on the death of Pamela Matropietro