Bergoglio

The demonstration of how a non-believer can reach shared analyzes and conclusions on the work of Bergoglio and the Counter-Church, without going so far as to define it as such. We know that and we remember that. But the part about the Council is really excellent.
FIFTH COLUMN
Of Marcello Veneziani
No, Holiness, a Pope cannot call “wild dogs” the next one, especially when it comes to Catholics, Christians, believers. Dogs is the derogatory definition that Muslims give of infidels and Christians. Even the most ruthless terrorists were defined by the pontiffs who preceded Francis, “men of the Red Brigades”, ISIS men. More cups. To descend to those lustful levels is not worthy of a Holy Father. Silence and prayer were the most dignified responses.
For goodness sake, let's not be beautiful souls. We know what a vermin there is in the intestines of the curia and in the slums of the Church. The pedophilia racket, like the gay lobby that Bergoglio himself once mentioned, these are just some of the dark sides of the Church. That pedophilia whose proportions are disconcerting, collegiality, mutual complicity, before its single and very frequent episodes. But beyond those murky turns that concern the sexual sphere there are at least two others: one focused on malfeasance and the other on the no-holds-barred war to conquer roles of clerical power. Tours that are certainly not born with Pope Bergoglio but they are the b-side of the Church, its face corrupted and has presented itself with ups and downs for several centuries, with a special emphasis since atheism and nihilism have also corroded faith within the sacred doors of the Church. One would want to invoke the dogs to heal the Church but the dogs of the Lord, what the Dominicans called themselves, to which the most brilliant Doctor of the Church also belonged, San Tommaso d’Aquino. Read More