Actuality | Science and Bioethics

Matthew Castagna, friend of Minister Fontana: “L'aborto è un omicidio”
by

After the interview with “The Mosquito” your Radio24 18/10/2018, And “Daily blitz” to patch up the statements of our Matteo Castagna (in fact it does not ask the questions asked by the hosts, nor that Castagna declared them live: “dirty questions”), which exclusively reiterates what the Catechism of Saint Pius X and the Social Doctrine of the Church teach

Matthew Castagna, friend of Minister Fontana: "Chi pratica l'aborto è un assassino"

Matthew Castagna, friend of Minister Fontana: “Whoever practices abortion is a murderer” (In the photo Ansa, Minister Fontana)

ROME – “Who practices abortion is a murderer. (“anyone who kills is a murderer” – real phrase said by Castagna, n.d.r.) I'm against contraception, no condoms and pills. He only enjoys himself to have children": to say it is Matthew Castagna of the traditionalist movement Christus Rex of Verona, friend of the Minister of the Family Lorenzo Fontana, so much to add: “My ideas are those of Minister Fontana, we have been friends since 23 years".

Speaking at La Zanzara, your Radio24, Castagna returned to the topic of abortion: “Whoever practices abortion is a murderer, like anyone who kills human lives. The doctor must necessarily make a conscientious objection. I would repeal the 194, right away. There would be a society educated on order and love of life. The cases of women wanting an abortion would be reduced to a minimum. I am against any form of contraception. Just as the doctrine of the Church says. We abstain. The sexual act with enjoyment is done by God only for procreation and that's it. Sex should only be had in marriage and only to procreate. Even bringing it into the world 50 children". Read More

Share
Actuality | Catholicism

Multicultural society is against the common good
by

Report BastaBugie editorial team

Immigration subverts nations (and the Social Doctrine of the Church)
Of Stefano Fontana

(AUTOMATIC READING)

We have long observed a clear support from the ecclesiastical hierarchy and from a large part of the Catholic world (conciliate, n.d.r.) to the idea of ​​encouraging a reception of immigrants that is almost free of filters and rather broad and generalized. It should be noted, however, that this new attitude differs from what is traditionally proposed by the Social Doctrine of the Church, that is, a government of migration guided by the criterion of the common good. Consequence, Indeed, of this new attitude seems to be the replacement of the common good with the multi-religious society, seen as the goal of society. A welcome without filters and without the governance of the common good means that the resulting multi-religious society is good in itself., to the point that even Catholics should work for it rather than for the common good or for it as it coincides with the common good.
The question owes its interest to the fact that a new approach of this kind would entail a substantial revision of the Social Doctrine of the Church, its structure and foundations. I don't process intentions, and therefore I cannot say whether the purpose of this “opening” to the immigration phenomenon is precisely to change the Social Doctrine of the Church in some fundamental points, However, I cannot avoid an objective verification of this important question. Read More

Share