Why all the chilean bishops resigned & Vatican II's Church of the future
Reporting of Tradition in Action
|
|
|
|
Reporting of Tradition in Action
|
|
|
|

Of Francesca de Villasmundo
In a general audience in December 2017Which testifies to the equality of the two sexes in the eyes of God, in the Catholic religion. But equality of dignity does not mean identical mission! To each his own job and the cows will be well looked after! – says a French proverb.
Unfortunately, this distinction of the sexes and their destiny does not satisfy our contemporary genderophilic and nihilistic society, which wants to make a clean sweep of every tradition, habit, Christian and natural uses and customs.
The world's assaults to impose an artificial feminization of ecclesial society, in tune with what is happening in the civil sphere, they multiply. Lately, two facts testify to these repeated attacks. And when it comes to destroying Catholic or even natural landmarks, Cardinal Schönborn, the “great theologian” of Pope Francis (Antipope, n.d.r.), it's never very far away …
Last 1 April, he granted ainterview to a group of Austrian journalists, belonging, among others, al Die Presse e al Salzburger Nachrichten. He declared to them that he was open to the idea of married priests and the ordination of women to the ministry of deacons, of presbyters and, why not, of the bishops.
We are faced with an attack against the apostolic letter Priestly ordination, with which, without council, Pope John Paul II confirmed that
On that occasion, John Paul II wasn't saying anything new: the Code of Canon Law of 1917, later taken up by the Code of 1983, sanctioned that "only the baptized man validly receives holy ordination" - can. 968 § 1.
Saint Thomas Aquinas considers the female sex as an impediment to receiving Holy Orders; by Pius XII, in his Apostolic Constitution Sacrament of Order of the 30 November 1947, in which he talks about the sacred orders of the diaconate, of the presbyterate and the episcopate, Affirma che "The Church has no power over the substance of the Sacraments.", that is in those things, witnesses to the sources of divine revelation, Christ the Lord himself decided to be kept in the sacramental sign. (The Church has no power over the substance of the Sacraments, that is, it is about everything that, as witnessed by the sources of divine Revelation, it was established by Christ the Lord himself as a sacramental sign).
Ora, Christ chose only men at the moment of the institution of the Sacrament of Orders.
Since the conciliar Cardinal Schönborn adheres to the process of upheaval based on the conciliar notions of the evolution of dogma - the living Tradition - it is evident that the aforementioned teachings cannot have any hold on him. Moreover, it is notable that his statements contrary to the decision of John Paul II, demonstrate that the conciliar magisterium cannot be infallible, which is completely logical since it is claimed that everything evolves.
The conciliar serpent bites its own tail: for its inherent contradictions and for those resulting from the conciliar popes!
Another one declaration, this time formulated under the inspiration of Pope Francis (Antipope, n.d.r.), reinforces the place that feminists have ended up occupying in the official Church in recent decades. Less radical than that of the cardinal (conciliar cardinal, n.d.r.) Schönborn, it opens the door in a similar but more subtle way to future sexist upheavals.
The Pontifical Commission for Latin America, presided over by Cardinal Ouellet and assembled by 6 al 9 last March on the theme of women, pillar in the building of the Church and society in Latin America, in his final document he recommends that a synod on the topic of women be held soon, to rethink its role in the life and mission of the Church: to "free" the latter "from prejudices, from the stereotypes and discrimination suffered by women" and move Christian communities towards "a "pastoral conversion" capable of asking for forgiveness for all the situations in which they have been and still are complicit in attacks on their dignity".
The Commission advances in support of "this opening" the fact that this does not "represent a concession to cultural and media pressure", but it is rather «the result of the awareness that the absence of women from decision-making bodies is a defect, an ecclesiological gap, the negative effect of a clerical and chauvinistic conception."
Awareness that nevertheless follows the modern trend! The conciliar Church, with this language, adheres fully, even if he feebly shields himself from it, to the feminist MeToo mentality, embodiment of gender theory that is subverting society and traditional structures. And the text specifies that this openness is also necessary for the good of souls: «If it isn't remedied in the short term, many women available to serve will feel neglected and despised in their abilities, and could eventually distance themselves from the Church".
Progressive and modernist clerics have been making this stale excuse since Vatican II, this false pretext, to impose their doctrinal innovations, contrary to Tradition. Which, However, it did not prevent some faithful from leaving the Church, On the contrary, the new religion built by them to further promote apostasy, it has put Catholics in the position where they no longer know which saint to turn to, having lost every certain reference…
And this fatal slide on the inclined plane does not seem to stop with Pope (Antipope, n.d.r.) Francesco.
FIFTH COLUMN
Of Longinus
Is called Francesco, ha 73 years, he is a retired worker and lives in Maldola, a small town in the Forlì Apennines. His daughter Elisa, 45 years, She has been brain damaged since birth. The day before yesterday morning, all 8.30, before entrusting her to the minibus that would take her - like every one, and 12 years – in a Service Center, Francesco fired a gunshot into Elisa's head, who died instantly. Then, Francesco turned the gun on himself and shot himself. He is now in very serious condition, while Elisa's mother is still in severe shock. Francesco was afraid he couldn't do it anymore, he was worried about not being able to continue to support Elisa's expenses and above all he was anxious about his daughter's future. What would happen without him and without his wife?
A story like many, it will be said. Yes, like too many. At the beginning of March, in Florence, a man of 84 years, Warring, he took his hunting rifle and shot his wife Gina, 82 years old and to his daughter Sabrina, 44 years, tetraplegica. Him too, like Francesco, he was afraid of the future.
Another Francesco, Instead, who has no fear of the future, and therefore of death, because he shows that he does not believe in Hell either, much less, in the immortality of the soul, it desecrates the contemplation and prayers of monks. Read More

Il 9 April, some prominent Dutch Catholics have sent a petition to their bishops against the “destructive policies” of Pope Francis, as Radio Maria Nederland reports. Intellectuals and priests signed the petition, among them the famous psychiatrist Gerard Aardweg and professor emeritus Wilhelmus Witteman of the Technical University of Twente. The petition lists Francis' major scandals, including Amoris Laetitia, his support for pro-death policies Emma…
CONTINUE ON:
https://gloria.tv/article/PRC9RzDPbsKo4zQHwVzL3VEcJ Read More
DEDICATED TO “RATZINGERIAN WIDOWS”:
Here is yet another proof of Ratzingerian conciliar disaster, which admits continuity with Bergoglio and the difference in styles, as we have always supported, also in reference to others “occupants” up to Roncalli (N.d.r.)
Letter from Pope Benedict XVI on the eve of Bergoglio's fifth anniversary: “There is internal continuity between the two pontificates”
Of Sergio Rame
“There is an internal continuity between the two pontificates”. Il Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI defends the magisterium of Pope Francis of which, Tomorrow, the fifth year after the election will occur.
After months deeply marked by internal controversies and by doubts raised by several cardinals, Ratzinger himself is acting as a screen for Bergoglio and today he wrote a letter to the prefect of the Secretariat for communication, Monsignor Dario Viganò. “Pope Francis – we read in the letter – he is a man of profound philosophical and theological training and therefore helps to see the internal continuity between the two pontificates, despite all the differences in style and temperament”.
It is not the first time that Benedict XVI has shown harmony with Pope Francis. Today the opportunity comes from the presentation of the series The theology of Pope Francis (published by Lev), but it arrives on the eve of the fifth anniversary of the appointment of Pope Francis. In the letter Ratzinger openly applauds the editorial initiative which, according to him, “wants to oppose and react to the foolish prejudice according to which Pope Francis is just a practical man without any particular theological or philosophical training, while I would have been solely a theorist of theology who would have understood little about the concrete life of a Christian today”. In the personal letter sent to the prefect of the Secretariat for communication, the pope emeritus thanks having received the gift of the eleven books written by as many theology of international fame that make up the series edited by Don Roberto Repole, president of the Italian Theological Association. “Small volumes – adds Benedict XVI – they rightly show that Pope Francis is a man of profound philosophical and theological education and therefore help to see the internal continuity between the two pontificates, even with all the differences of style and temperament”. Read More
E’ Seplenist, but some of his observations make us think. Let us therefore ignore the attribution of Catholic terms to the conciliars (N.d.r.)
http://www.liberoquotidiano.it/news/sfoglio/13317619/papa-francesco-marcello-veneziani-figlio-globalizzazione-piu-che-della-chiesa.html
On the occasion of the first 5 years of pontificate of Pope Francis, The weather produces a special issue with a front page almost entirely dedicated to Bergoglio. Many comments on the Pontiff and his work, including that of Marcello Veneziani, “A vicar for three crises”. The editorialist clearly speaks of “radical turning point“, but it does so in critical terms. And he writes: “He is a Pope perceived as a son of his time rather than of the Church, son of globalization rather than tradition". And again: “A Pope open to the most distant, who loves the most remote neighbor, open to Muslims before Christians, to Protestants before Catholics, to the poor more than to the faithful, to individuals - even gays - more than to families".
Heavy words, In short, and Veneziani notes how “all this has been ennobled as a return to early Christianity“. In his analysis, the editorialist recalls how "once the Pope did not want to criticize some behaviors until yesterday considered deplorable by the Church, taking refuge behind Christian humility: Who am I to judge. One would have to answer him: you are a Pope, that is, a Holy Father, and you have not only the right but the duty to judge, to orient, to exhort and condemn. Otherwise – warns Veneziani – you are failing in your pastoral role, to your evangelical mission". Read More
Reporting of Tradition in Action
Atila Sinke Guimarães
HOW TRIBALISM BECOMES SATANISM – Considering that Pope Francis seems to be embarking on a full-steam campaign to promote tribalism – we saw him in Chile and Peru this past week declaring that “Amazonia is the heart of the Church,” – I thought it timely to warn my readers about the dangers of this move. Toward this end, I first recommend that they read the article by Prof. Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira in this topic. But I also want to translate into simple terms what tribalism is.
The motto ‘It is forbidden to forbid’ painted on Paris; below, a 1968 student & workers march against authority announcing ‘We will win’– and they did/bev212_March.jpg)
We are all suffering the deleterious influence of the 1968 Sorbonne Revolution, which in the United States is almost unknown by this name because here the fruits of that Revolution are generally referred to as the “Cultural Revolution of the ‘60s,” which found its most expressive landmark in the hippie Woodstock festival in 1969.
Independent of the name used here or abroad, what counts is that the Revolution in customs can be summarized by three of its slogans: “It is forbidden to forbid,” “Death to reason” and “Imagination rules.”
We have seen many consequences of the application of these moral-philosophical mottos. Among many: the disappearance of morality in society, logic in thinking, respect for superiors, good behavior in families, decorum in dressing and propriety in language.
These liberal-anarchical manifestations had immediate reflections in the political-administrative spheres, such as the increase of feminist laws pretending that women are equal to men, as well as the concession of legal rights to abortionists and homosexuals. Read More