Populism: between rebellion and construction
“We Catholic traditionalists give the metaphysical reason for the existence of populism. Like it or not. In the long term, the right path of sovereignty and identity will converge, even unconsciously, in the restoration of the Papacy, as a transcendent condition for the reordering of society” (Matthew Castagna, Christ the King-Tradition)
Of Roberto Siconolfi
Source: over the line
Today the entire establishment is moving full steam ahead in opposition to the nascent populist movement. Populism, this derogatory term invoked for every maneuver, political or theoretical, which goes beyond EU directives and single thinking. A gap that opens within an increasingly complete and totalitarian system and which vehemently affirms the renewed needs of the European peoples.
In the preface to the essay “Populism – the end of the right and the left” by Alain de Benoist, Prof Zarelli states that it is also a mentality and a state of mind. And how could he not, from a conscious and rational point of view we can affirm that it is "the voice of the soul of the European peoples". A process that follows the awakening of the sacred feminine of the original metaphysical conceptions. A soul that revolts against the abuses of a society of obtuse bureaucrats, of a system of debtors and creditors (see Eurozone), of technocrats who have debased the best identity and cultural qualities of the peoples of Europe with the force of mass psychology.
But who is afraid of populists and why?? By analyzing the categories we can define a group of restricted oligarchies made up of: financial economics; mainstream (a vast category that includes both the world of media and mass culture); heteronomous centers of power (Bilderberg, Trilateral, Aspen Institute, NATO etc.). It is from here that the threads are woven as well as political domination, also of the attack on the entire populist movement as a whole. Read More
Identities die between racism and anti-racism
Of Alessandro Soldà Cristofari
Source: over the line
Let's start with a news story: an American girl publishes some photos on her social profile in which she is wearing a beautiful evening dress at a party (whose dress code requires a certain elegance).
However, alongside the compliments, some more comments appear under the photographs critics, let's just say she is insulted: his fault is that of wearing a traditional Chinese dress, symbol of female emancipation, without knowing the meaning, disrespecting the entire Chinese people.
And so we don't miss anything, she is also accused of cultural appropriation and to bend a symbolic dress to the pure hedonism symbol of American capitalist and consumerist society. In the end, despite the cowardly and senseless attack, those photos remain on his profile: because she likes that dress, and it certainly won't be that gratuitous malice on social media that will force her to change her mind.
Faced with this story, one remains perplexed; on his part there was no obvious or at least voluntary lack of respect towards China, living in a society where the consumption it is the prevailing culture to the detriment of the previous traditional and historical heritage - which is that of individuals and their respective peoples -, and it is therefore normal not to be aware that certain accessories and objects refer to an event or story of fundamental and historical importance for a nation, as is the case with the girl's dress. Read More