Orbán all'Europarlamento: "Non accettiamo minacce e ricatti. We will not be a homeland of immigration"

The Hungarian Prime Minister speaks before the plenary in Strasbourg “to defend Hungary which has been a member of the European family for a thousand years”

STRASBOURG – After partially anticipating his speech with several posts on his Facebook profile, the Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán spoke today in Strasbourg at the European Parliament hearing on Sargentini report in which it will be decided whether or not to sanction Budapest on violation of the rule of law. “You have already formed an idea about this relationship, and my intervention will not change your opinion, but I came anyway. You will not condemn a government, but Hungary which has been a member of the European family for a thousand years. I'm here to defend my homeland”, said the Hungarian prime minister, who defended his actions above all due to the broad consensus that his government receives at home. And really comforted by internal consensus, Orban had no problem taking sides directly against the European institutions: “Hungary will be condemned because it has decided that it will not be a homeland for immigration. But we will not accept threats and blackmail from pro-immigration forces: we will defend our borders, we will stop illegal immigration against you too, if necessary”. The leader of Fidesz, who is part of the European People's Party family in Brussels, he stated how the measures on immigration were taken on the basis of the will expressed by the Hungarian people: “We are the ones who defend our borders and only we can decide who to live with. We stopped hundreds and thousands of illegal migrants and defended Hungary and Europe. The Hungarians have decided that our homeland will not be a country of immigration.". Read More

Share

"Soros papers": like the Open Society Foundation controls a third of the European parliament

Of Francesco Galofaro
"Soros papers": like the Open Society Foundation controls a third of the European parliament
Source: The Antidiplomat
With this article Marx XXI is about to publish a series of in-depth studies on Soros Papers. These are confidential documents of the Open Society Foundation which is headed by the controversial naturalized American financier George Soros, published by the site DC Leaks. Our investigation starts from the European Parliament and the way in which the Foundation carries out lobbying activities on a third of the deputies elected in 2014. In the next issues we will deal more specifically with the electoral campaign of 2014 and how the Foundation attempted to influence her. In the end, we will delve deeper into the aims of the Open Society Foundation, to ask us whether his way of proceeding does not constitute a threat to democracy.
The source
DC Leaks is a site known for leaking, in the past, the emails of the participants in the democratic congress of 2016 [1], rivelando come il gruppo dirigente avesse sabotato la campagna elettorale di Bernie Sanders. In August of 2016 DC Leaks published 2600 files relating to the foundation's activities and strategies Open Society. According to accusations from US security agencies, The Russian group would be hiding behind the page Fancy Bear, specialized in cyber espionage. How the documents were obtained is uncertain. By Laura Silber's admission, spokesperson of the foundation, the data comes from one intranetused by members of the board of directors, by the foundation's staff and partners [2], which suggests a deep throat (whistleblower) internal to the organization, moved by ideal motivations, or to the technique of spear phishing, with ad personam emails that exploit data on the recipient in order to convince him to collaborate. Read More

Share

Copyright, the European Parliament rejects the directive

Image results for gag webWe already talked about it at the end of June. The law he would have, in all likelihood, gagged us too, it didn't pass. At least for the moment…(n.d.r.)
STRASBOURG – The European Parliament blocks copyright reform. L’Eurocamera, meeting in plenary in Strasbourg, rejected the start of negotiations with the Council (318 no, 278 yes and 31 abstained) on a proposed directive that had split the Assembly in half. Now the discussion of the proposal is postponed to the next plenary, in September, but it is likely that the text on the digital single market is destined to run aground on further amendments between now and the end of the legislature. Also because time is running out: in May 2019 we return to the polls for the European elections and the assembly that is expected to be "quite different".
The unknowns of September
At least to use the euphemism of a European Chamber spokesperson. The topic has never been easier, but the situation became heated after approval, last 20 June, of the amendments of the Legal Affairs Committee. The changes to the articles sparked the controversy 11 e 13, i.e. the obligation of economic recognition of the contents disseminated by the platforms (item 11) and installing a “filter” to prevent copyrighted material from being uploaded online (item 13). Actually, the directive concerns more the relationship between online platforms (come YouTube o Google) and publishers and end users. The intention of the text is to regulate the economic recognition of copyright in the Web era, replacing a regulatory system stuck at 2001. Read More

Share