If we abolish the Sacred, It's not worth living

Reporting of BastaBugie editorial team
I'm about to start the brigade ”two plus two equals four”, where we will fight to the death to defend the obvious (VIDEO: two plus two equals four)

Of Silvana De Mari

(AUTOMATIC READING)
Among the gifts asked eight months ago at Christmas from Baby Jesus: peace for persecuted Christians, a home for earthquake victims in the cold, in total cold, more absolute, in the cold of a government that certainly didn't love them, and for us courage, infinite courage, because that's what we need now to avoid being overwhelmed.
Many pastors have abandoned, they betrayed, they sold themselves, the sheep are alone before the wolves.
We ask Christ for the courage to become sheepdogs, those who defend the flock from the most total lies, the first of which is the loss of the sacred, the loss of God's gaze, the reduction of Christ's message to a very selective pauperism.
Once the sense of the sacred is lost, the distinction between good and evil becomes blurred, right and wrong, true and false. The loss of the sacred is the loss of the way that Christ came to open.
The sense of the sacred means waking up and knowing that God knows you are there, walk, write, tidy up the kitchen and know that you are in God's gaze. Read More

Share

Fontana: 'Abolire la legge Mancino'

'Law used by globalists to cover up their anti racism- Italia’. Marcucci (PD) : 'Increasingly black government’

“Let's repeal the Mancino law, which in these strange years has transformed into a regulatory platform used by globalists to cloak their anti-Italian racism with anti-fascism". It is proposed by Minister for the Family, Lorenzo Fontana, in a Facebook post.
“The events of the last few days – writes Minister Lorenzo Fontana on Facebook – make it increasingly clear how racism has become the ideological weapon of the globalists and their slaves (some mainstream journalists and commentators, certain parties) to point the finger at the Italian people, falsely accuse him of any atrocity, make the majority of citizens feel guilty for the vote expressed and for the intolerable distance from the rhetoric of single thought. A subtle and dangerous ideological weapon designed to guide opinions. All the front pages of the newspapers, assembling the case artfully, they pointed the finger at the worrying wave of racism, to find out, in a tragic parody, that there wasn't even a shadow of it. So if there is racism, Today, it is primarily the one used by the mainstream circuit against the Italians. The reason? A people - adds the Northern League minister - who do not all think the same way and who are aware and aware of their own identity and history scares the globalists, Why it cannot be exploited. Let's repeal the Mancino law, which in these strange years has transformed into a regulatory platform used by globalists to cloak their anti-Italian racism with anti-fascism. The puppeteers of the rhetoric of single thought – he concludes – must deal with it: their great deception has been revealed”.
“It's an increasingly black government. The Minister of the Family (sic) Fontana now proposes to abolish the #Mancino law which prohibits the apology of fascism. The serious thing is that this is not a case of sunstroke by a slightly bizarre minister.". Thus on Twitter the group leader of the Democratic Party at Palazzo Madama Andrea Marcucci

ANSA | 03-08-2018 12:29

Read More

Share

The left reduced to the sole thought of the elites

Of Carlo Freccero
The left reduced to the sole thought of the elites
THE SELF-CRITICISM OF A CERTAIN LEFT (N.D.R.)
Source: The Manifesto
The left is in crisis today and is wondering how it could speak to the new populisms to lead them back to the tracks of an elitist democracy that resembles an oligarchy more than a democracy in the strict sense.
Vice versa, even when he says he wants to listen to the malaise of which populism is an expression, the left entrenches itself in the clichés of political correctness. While, In my opinion, an objective self-analysis would be enough to understand things from another angle. The question is what the left is today and what the left once was? Because there has been such a radical change? I already know the answer. We were wrong. What if we are wrong now?
In any case, reflect on what the left was at its origins, already contains the answer to the problem of populism today.
Before, right-wing populism didn't exist because many of the instances of today's populism were on the left. And the growth of people's rights was not considered reactionary, but progressive.
The great fracture on the left begins with the so-called third way and the complete surrender of progressives to neoliberalism. Since then we have been immersed in the single thought to the point of having lost the memory of ourselves. Read More

Share

The construction site of unique thought

Of Marco Della Luna
The construction site of unique thought
Source: Marco Della Luna
One of the most conspicuous phenomena of our time is the gigantic and industrious construction site of globalized single thought - with its clients, architects, guardian priests - which serves to make social behavior predictable and directional in the super-accelerated and conflictual world in which we live.
Global financial capitalism, maneuvering the cultural industry (including entertainment), which it largely possesses, he created an orthodoxy, an obligatory thought, mainstream, scientifically correct, how delegitimizing, isolates or criminalizes – that is, practically excommunicates, it expels from conformed society - not only thinking divergent from orthodoxy, but the same free scientific investigation, economic and historiographical, regarding some fundamental things to direct the course of the transformation of society according to his plans. These things are: certain historical events, certain aspects of the economy, European integration, the euro, immigration, l’islam, ethnic diversity, sexual identity; e, lastly, the alleged efficacy and harmlessness of mandatory vaccines.
Protected beliefs have been built on these things, protected beliefs, in the sense that dissent with respect to orthodoxy, and the same free scientific and historical investigation of those beliefs, they are sanctioned with moral delegitimization, career boycott, administrative discrimination, the exclusion of the media, from teaching, from publishing, when not even criminal consequences. Facts that conflict with orthodoxy are withheld from public opinion, especially in key fields for the orientation of collective thought and sensitivity, of the general conception of reality, of political consensus, of legislation and jurisdiction. Read More

Share