These phrases disgust you? You find it wrong that a club that receives money from the state is named after the author of these sentences? Bene : I am at your voice. For having raised my opinion against all this I am undergoing two trials. My processes are a huge plus on the one hand, because they allow my words to bounce and even the huge army of enemy newspapers is forced to report them, but they have the disadvantage of costing me rivers of money.
I ask for help. I am your voice. So that this voice is not silenced, support me!
The statement that Mario Mieli was a pedophile is true and incontrovertible. Mario Mieli affirms his pedophilia in the text Elements of homosexual criticism.
The correct meaning of the word “pedophile” is: person erotically attracted to minors. Pedophilia is a mental condition characterized by erotic attraction to minors, condition considered by some to be a paraphilia or perversion, from the latest DSM it is considered a sexual orientation. Anyone who claims to be erotically attracted to children, regardless of whether or not he has committed pedophile acts, he can only be declared a pedophile.
Mario Mieli unequivocally declares his erotic attraction for children, that is, for people under the age of puberty, in his book Elements of homosexual criticism, initially published by Einaudi, in the latest edition by Feltrinelli.
“We revolutionary fags know how to see the child as a potentially free human being. We, Yes, we can love children. We can desire them erotically by responding to their desire for Eros, we can grasp with face and open arms the intoxicating sensuality they exude, we can make love with them. This is why pederasty is so harshly condemned: it addresses loving messages to the child than society, through family, traumatizes, educastra, nega, lowering the Oedipal grid onto his eroticism” (Mario Mieli, Elements of homosexual criticism, pag 55 PDF http://www.mariomieli.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Elementi_di_critica_omosessuale.pdf).
This sentence is very serious for many reasons.
- Mieli declares his pedophilia in the sense of erotic desire, and exposes a program of pedophile acts, summarized in words we will make love with them. Declares the plan for the pedophile act, the physical act with the child, as better than non-pedophilia. The pedophile act constitutes enormous and irreversible damage both from a psychological point of view, sometimes irreversible damage even from a physical point of view. Making love to them, and a euphemistic term that does not only indicate the act of experiencing pleasure through the child's body, but it indicates the act of introducing the penis into the child's body, a small and immature body, with possible vaginal damage and certain anal damage, even irreversible, even more so as the small body is below puberty. According to Mieli those who are pedophiles, who desire children's bodies, who plan to “make love to them”, they are better than those who do not erotically desire children, and they do not wish to use their immature bodies for erotic purposes. According to Mieli, the latter are people who traumatize children, they educate them , bizarre neologism that merges the words educate and castrate, and they must be fought. Education has as its objective the transformation of the child, tending to be polymorphous and “perverse”, in a heterosexual adult, erotically mutilated but compliant with the Norm, ( Elements of homosexual criticism, 2; p. 17)
- The revolution advocated by Mieli consists in imposing pedophilia, fighting those who fight it. Unlike other pedophiles, for example the signatories of the famous "Manifesto in defense of pedophilia" with the names of Jean-Paul Sartre at the bottom, Simone de Beauvoir, Michel Foucault and, Jack Lang and Daniel Cohn-Bendit, who simply ask for the act committed with a minor to no longer be considered a crime 12 years, Mieli does not limit himself to asking that ephebophilia be tolerated, he plans to make love with children, therefore minors well below puberty and states that making love with children is positive and good for them, not doing so is bad. This is false, before puberty there is no sexuality, every form of sexuality is violence.
- The derogatory word fagots that Mieli uses is serious, demonstrating his self-hatred, its self-desecration: a hatred that reached its peak in coprophagia and suicide.
- The plural is very serious. Mieli doesn't say: I'm a revolutionary fagot, but he says we revolutionary fags. Who means by the word we? Him and all his followers, those who will use his name, those who will recommend his book as edifying and essential reading, those who will write describing Mieli's life and work as good and recommendable? Mieli founds a pedophile movement, his book is an ideological construction that affirms pedophilia as a positive element, buono, right and the lack of pedophilia as repression and "education", a term he coined that combines educating and castrating. That We can push us to think that with him there are all those who will use his name, for example to give it to a club they belong to?
Mieli is a theorist of pedophilia, in particular the homosexual one.
He is also a theorist of coprophagia, as well as practicing it. His "libertarian vision" exposed in a text relating to a conference held by Mieli in February 1982 in Brescia entitled, The liberation of Eros for the achievement of harmony (G.Silvestri, Eros Harmony Gold. The last Mario Mieli, Croce Library Editions, Roma 2012).
In it, Mieli expresses in fact, according to his style, without mincing words one's thoughts on practices such as coprophagia, il sadism e the murder of a consenting person in the context of an erotic game.
Compared to coprophagia the homosexual activist invites the audience to discover its "value" and "hidden meaning", stating:
«Coprophagia is a source of pleasure, of course if you eat…. because you want to do it and you are not forced. Coprophagia feels good and develops our creative faculties […] The coprophagus does not need to make proselytes, as it experiences increasing pleasure by feeding on its own feces […]».
Mario Mieli also praises coprophagia in his life: in theatrical performances he ate his own and his dog's excrement, and created an "alchemical bread" on the occasion of his impromptu wedding ceremony which he offered to the guests. He had kneaded sperm excrement into the alchemical bread, sweat , saliva. With these acts Mieli demonstrates his very violent self-hatred, a self-hatred that later resulted in suicide. All Mieli's statements against natural and Christian values and against the Norm, to use his words , they are the absolute hatred that the submerged have for the saved. Mario Mieli hates and hates anyone who doesn't hate and doesn't self-destruct.
“Spontaneous” coprophagia is the pinnacle of self-hatred. Coprophagia is imposed in torture rooms. Those who apply it are torturing themselves. It is a serious gesture due to the ingestion of fecal-oral bacteria and viruses, and increases the risk of spreading hepatitis A, they are entrocolitis, parasites, an act so serious that it is instinctively found repugnant.
source – https://www.silvanademaricommunity.it/2019/05/16/combattete-con-me-io-sono-la-vostra-voce/
