Of Luciano Gallina (“Dr. S.L.”: copyrighted title and we won't reveal why)
AFTER ALL, IT CAN’ READ THE ARTICLE TO WHICH THE LETTER REFERS
Open Letter
Director of Treviso People's Life
Bishop of Treviso
Treviso 23-04-2018 Anno LIII E. 157
TO WHOM IT BENEFITS?
Let's play with our cards exposed.
Sinning of presumption, I am known and disliked by the Curia and the Diocese of Treviso.
I am writing in reference to the article signed by Lucio Bonomo (SIC), on the Life of the People of 22-04-2118 Anno LIII E. CVII n°15. Article with headline on the front page: WITH FAITH AND RESPECT and title on third page: APPROACH WITH FAITH WITHOUT EXCESS OF ZEAL.
I ask the question: To whom it is useful?
Without the risk of being contradicted, You and I received the same teaching, or the so-called catechism of Saint Pius. In our times school started for EVERYONE on October 1st and with it also the DOCTRINE, that was the name of the catechism. I started school on October 1st 1966 Year I E. 157. Every morning before going to school, we went to doctrine.
I remember very well, the teaching of the parish priest of the town on the most absolute ban for ANY person, Naturally Priest excluded, to touch the Consecrated Hosts for any reason.
I remind the distracted, that Saint Francis of Assisi, he did not want to take Holy Orders, because he considered himself unworthy of touching the Body of Christ. He is unworthy? And us?
I remember that the 4 October St. Francis Holy Mass is First Class. Privilege reserved only for very few Saints, that is to say: 19 March e 1 May Saint Joseph, 30 April Saint Catherine of Siena and the 29 June Saints Peter and Paul. Normally Sunday Masses are Second Class.
What does it mean: WITHOUT EXCESS OF ZEAL?
We will have to be less zealous than Christ? Zeal for your house devours me.
Perhaps these evangelical words are superseded by the one decided in the Year IV E. 157?
St. Francis was TOO zealous? What would Saint Francis say today about the extraordinary ministers of communion?
This behavior “without excess of zeal”, it is perhaps inferior in terms of offense to God to those who in the time of Christ behaved as described in this passage of the Gospel?
He found people selling oxen in the temple, sheep and doves, and the money changers sitting at the counter. Then made a lash of strings, He drove everyone out of the temple with the sheep and oxen; he threw the money changers' money to the ground and overturned their stalls, and to the dove sellers he said: «Take these things away and do not make my Father's house a market place»
A lot, in the language of the Roman Catholic Apostolic Church, it is the fervent working for the glory of God.
Ergo today we have to measure the zeal to avoid which type of problem?
I conclude with the first question: To whom it is useful, dedicate the first and third pages of the diocesan weekly, considering some facts:

• Everyone takes Communion as they want, I believe that there are very rare cases of priests who refuse to give Communion in the hand, I only have the memory of a Neapolitan friar in Lourdes in 2017, who refused to give Communion in his hand.
• There are always very rare cases of people who "protest" because Communion is given in their hands and when they protest they are laughed at first and foremost by the presbyters.

A little advice, keep the copy in question of Vita del Popolo, it could be useful as a defense document before Christ on the day of DIES NATALIS, in case we were accused of lack of zeal.
May God forgive me for the last sentence.
Praised be Jesus Christ
Dr. S.L.©Luciano Gallina