In Prague the dear beloved Soviets

FIFTH COLUMN
Of Marcello Veneziani
Like today, in the night between 20 and the 21 August fifty years ago, Soviet tanks invaded Czechoslovakia and crushed the Prague Spring dream of freedom. They will talk about it adequately on TV and in the newspapers? They will also remember this shadowy side of '68? They will remember the infamy of those who defended them and took their side, as the Italian communists did? Or they'll say it's been too long now, and therefore we can talk about fascism and Nazism every day, dead 73 years ago, but we can no longer talk about communism, which is much more recent and present?
It should also be remembered that a part of the Italian communists dissociated themselves from the PCI and condemned the Russian invasion, as the Manifesto group did. But with a small detail: they did not dissent to embrace socialism with a human face but to pursue a much more inhuman socialism, the Chinese one, with Mao who with his cultural revolution was much bloodier than Stalin and Brezhnev. In a debate in a hall of the Chamber opened by Napolitano, a few years ago I remembered the silence of the PCI regarding the revolt, the contempt towards the insurgents and the silence of the party and L'Unità towards dissidents, come Jiri Pelikan, which was then "adopted" by Craxi's PSI. Fassino pointed out to me that, on the contrary, the PCI had supported Prime Minister Dubcek and socialism with a human face. Right, until Dubcek was in power, tolerated by the Soviet Union… But later, when the tanks arrived, and there was the revolt, an embarrassed silence fell and the orthodox thesis prevailed, supported precisely by the communist right of Amendola and Napolitano, that those who show solidarity with the insurgents are playing the usual lurking reaction game. The Italian communists aligned themselves with the Soviets, like in Budapest before, in '56, and to Gdańsk and Szczecin afterwards, in the '70s. Furthermore, we must not forget that until 1978 the funding for the PCI and L'Unità continued to come from the USSR, and the contributions from the Italian-Czechoslovak Association continued to arrive. That's how it was in '68, the Soviet tanks lost a few r and for the local communists they remained the dear beloved Soviets... Read More

Share

Central banks are walking on eggshells. QE may not end…

Of Maurizio Blondet

Central banks are walking on eggshells. QE may not end.

Remember the title of the Manifesto? It was a few days ago: “The fun is over!”, he titled. The "communist" newspaper rejoiced because the European Central Bank had announced that "purchases of public debt will be canceled in December", and therefore the interest on the debt that financial speculation would have demanded from Italy would have been so high, to make the government fail...
Read all.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Read More

Share

The left reduced to the sole thought of the elites

Of Carlo Freccero
The left reduced to the sole thought of the elites
THE SELF-CRITICISM OF A CERTAIN LEFT (N.D.R.)
Source: The Manifesto
The left is in crisis today and is wondering how it could speak to the new populisms to lead them back to the tracks of an elitist democracy that resembles an oligarchy more than a democracy in the strict sense.
Vice versa, even when he says he wants to listen to the malaise of which populism is an expression, the left entrenches itself in the clichés of political correctness. While, In my opinion, an objective self-analysis would be enough to understand things from another angle. The question is what the left is today and what the left once was? Because there has been such a radical change? I already know the answer. We were wrong. What if we are wrong now?
In any case, reflect on what the left was at its origins, already contains the answer to the problem of populism today.
Before, right-wing populism didn't exist because many of the instances of today's populism were on the left. And the growth of people's rights was not considered reactionary, but progressive.
The great fracture on the left begins with the so-called third way and the complete surrender of progressives to neoliberalism. Since then we have been immersed in the single thought to the point of having lost the memory of ourselves. Read More

Share

On the enemies of civilization

Of Maurizio Blondet
On the enemies of civilization
Source: Maurizio Blondet
An American couple decided to raise the being they created (which they called Zoomer) “without gender”: «She/he will choose which gender she/he identifies with, once he is able to express himself". Il Sussidiario spoke about it laudably 16 April, how the two address Zoomer with a neutral pronoun. “Zoomer's parents don't want him to grow up limited by a culture of gender stereotypes. “Gender creative” is an educational method to develop Zoomer's creativity....”.
Obviously, it's not that the little creature is of uncertain sex. It's that they are the parents, an iron adherent to all the latest ideologies of fashion, for not having “wanted to reveal whether they are the parents of a boy or a girl, preferring to "free ourselves from stereotypes". The journalist doesn't even grasp the ideological nature, fanatic, of the parents' language: «I decided not to assign a gender to Zoomer. I will wait for her to choose for herself which of the two to identify with.". So “I have decided” for Zoomer, in its place. It's not absurd? No, and it is no longer news to be noted with surprise, as Il Sussidiario does. "Monthly seminars on gender medicine and pharmacology" are now held at the State University of Milan., that is, on the use of hormonal drugs that suspend puberty in adolescents, so that he/she chooses "free from stereotypes", later. Read More

Share