Of Maurizio Blondet

Source: Maurizio Blondet
An American couple decided to raise the being they created (which they called Zoomer) “without gender”: «She/he will choose which gender she/he identifies with, once he is able to express himself". Il Sussidiario spoke about it laudably 16 April, how the two address Zoomer with a neutral pronoun. “Zoomer's parents don't want him to grow up limited by a culture of gender stereotypes. “Gender creative” is an educational method to develop Zoomer's creativity....”.
Obviously, it's not that the little creature is of uncertain sex. It's that they are the parents, an iron adherent to all the latest ideologies of fashion, for not having “wanted to reveal whether they are the parents of a boy or a girl, preferring to "free ourselves from stereotypes". The journalist doesn't even grasp the ideological nature, fanatic, of the parents' language: «I decided not to assign a gender to Zoomer. I will wait for her to choose for herself which of the two to identify with.". So “I have decided” for Zoomer, in its place. It's not absurd? No, and it is no longer news to be noted with surprise, as Il Sussidiario does. "Monthly seminars on gender medicine and pharmacology" are now held at the State University of Milan., that is, on the use of hormonal drugs that suspend puberty in adolescents, so that he/she chooses "free from stereotypes", later.
http://www.gender.unimi.it/
Yet it seems like yesterday – you may have forgotten? – that we were told that “gender theory does not exist”. The media kept telling us this, Courier l'Espresso, obviously Il Fatto Quotidiano, Republic; the tv; all the PD parliamentarians shouted it in our ears. You can find the titles on the web:
Michela Marzano: “Gender theory does not exist.
No, it is a propaganda invention of the reactionaries "to block the law on civil unions", he was alarmed.

Giannini: «Gender theory does not exist»

https://ilmanifesto.it/giannini-la-teoria-del-gender-non-esiste-a-scuola/
E’ “A cultural scam”, tuonava la Minister of Education Stefania Giannini; he even threatened , on behalf of the offended institutions, to sue for defamation "those who have spoken and continue to speak about gender theory in relation to the Renzi government's educational project on schools". The famous Buona Renzi School.
Now that gender is now mainstream, and its pharmacology is taught at the University of Milan, I would like to know who those Italians were who threatened Enrica Perucchietti and Gianluca Marletta with death, when in 2014 theirs had come outUNISEX, the creation of man without identity" (Arianna Publishing). Enrica herself tells it in her latest book, “Fake News, how power controls the media and fabricates information to obtain consensus".
“We were accused of profiting from a hoax, as gender theory does not exist.... Some bookstores were forced to remove the copies from the shelves and publicly apologize to the LGBT associations for having dared to display the book. Then came the insults and false comments on Amazon.", “the wave of hatred and violence” spread across the web.
“Finally the signed death threats arrived. Many wrote that they would burn the books in the square (and then we would be the Nazis...) and that they would have willingly put us at the stake too". And since Enrica is female, these defenders of a world without prejudice "wished her death in the flames" but not before having suffered "rape".
Many insulters wrote: you simply have to be "ashamed" of taking on certain positions.
In particular, I would like to listen to "the lady who reported Marletta and me to the Order of Psychologists, as we needed – in his opinion – a TSO: we were crazy and needed to be cured".
Know what environment he comes from, what is your background?. He realizes the repugnant baseness of what he did? Of its totalitarian nature? In the last decades of the Soviet Union, dissidents – harmless writers and intellectuals – were declared schizophrenic and committed to a mental hospital. The reason was clearly explained by General Secretary Brezhnev: “in the Soviet Union there are no political prisoners because in socialist society there are no social conflicts and the few dissatisfied can only be mentally ill.” Evidently, the lady shares exactly the same vision: those who disagree with PD and the civil rights left, and the perfect society they created, he has no right to be heard – he must be hospitalized. Even taking charge of the denunciation is in the old tradition. After all, the PD is the direct heir of the PCI, and his followers and ministers, if they have abandoned the working masses, they maintained the repressive will of communism, NKVD nostalgia.
I would like to know who are those who – in defense of the ideological truth, that is, of the lie of the established order – they felt the duty to send signed death threats, if those who wanted to burn the books know that they evoke an act that their propaganda attributes to Nazism, that is, to what they are instructed to declare Absolute Evil. It's possible that they don't understand the connection? What level of intelligence do they have?
And in general: it is understood that private individuals of a certain ideology can be irritated by the disturbers of Single Thought and State Conformism, especially if it has yet to be established as dogma. But from here to take the trouble not only to become psycho-policemen of the Constituted Disorder, but also to present themselves as executioners and executioners, it means that they come from an inhuman level of degradation. That same level from which those who kill their "companions" come from when they want to leave them. Or kids who victimize teachers.

What level is it? At the risk of repeating myself, I still have to refer to the concept of "Vertical invasion of the barbarians". Each new generation of newborns enters society as barbarians, innocently ignoring everything about civilization; it must be educated in the community it has entered, educated in the culture and good customs that our ancestors handed down to us; it is "tradition" or the transmission of civilization from parents to children. As has been noted, the left - as it rejects all "Tradition" as obscurantism - is incapable of transmitting progress. The little barbarians remain barbarians even as adults: that is, unable to control their sexual or homicidal impulses, immediately slaves – dependent – ​​on some vice (drug, disco or sex ) because no one taught them to exercise their character and will, lacking basic good manners; reduced to relating to women in the most immediate and brutal way, because no one taught them the rudiments of that formidable ingredient of Christian culture, which is called "cavalry". He also doesn't have nobility of mind, for these adult barbarians, no sense; consequentially, they are not ashamed of any baseness or cowardice, even repugnant.
The trouble is that the very young barbarians who are in the news because in the Good School they beat the teachers and bully them, they are children of barbaric parents – those who beat up teachers to defend their children from bad grades, who clearly do not recognize any authority as legitimate - except that of punches. On the contrary, grandchildren of progressives now in their seventies, barbarians of '68 and the Cultural Revolution. In short, we are already at least in the third successive generation of uneducated and non-civilized barbarians, and each one was delivered (betrayal, in latino) from the previous one less and less culture, logic, history and aesthetics, character training. Functional illiterates, they cannot read anything other than simplified sentences, which they take at face value, without grasping implications, irony, shades of meaning.
They give extreme importance to conformism: not having developed an autonomous personality, they want only one thing, stay in the group, and they fear only one thing: being “excluded from the group”.
This is precisely what makes them both fearsome (they mass) and absolutely vulnerable to the manipulation strategies that the strong powers adopt for their benefit. The “conversion of the heterosexual community to gender ideology” was indeed a great marketing strategy. Paul Rondeau, market consultant, he described it in Selling Homosexuality to America (Selling homosexuality to America, 2002). The essence of the strategy is: never counter your opponents' arguments with other reasoning arguments, never appeal to dialectical debate - a sphere completely foreign to the human mass you want to convince - but exclude them in advance from the discussion as delusional, manifestation of religious bigotry (which the neo-savages translate “out of fashion”), and prejudices of marginal minorities, therefore weak (to be bullied without risk), therefore ridiculous. Uncivilized barbarians abhor those who are in the minority and out of fashion. The game is done.
The point is that “selling homosexuality to America” took decades. In Italy, from "gender theory does not exist" to "scientific" seminars on drugs to block puberty for adolescents so that they can "choose gender" as the new normal, three or four years have passed. And now the new ideology is fiercely defended by the neo-barbaric masses, grim and invincible voluntary psycho-police that enlists itself in the denunciation and denunciation of the unbelievers of the new orthodoxy.
Naturally, among the things that no one has taught them is that the plurality of ideas and opinions is legitimate. Indeed, it is essential to political life and civilization.
The third generation of uncivilized barbarians, here's the problem. Here are the enemies of the homeland.
 
patria

As I closed this article, I received this message from a reader. Talk about how the progressive and advanced mainstream treats the horrible signal of students who insult in the Good School, they humiliate and threaten teachers. I think it completes the meaning of what I wanted to say well.
“…Returning earlier than usual from a work appointment I stumbled upon the “housewives programs” today , where - with a regular psychologist and "alternative" teacher present - there was a lively debate about the self-styled students of Lucca and the shameful episode in which the young man wearing a motorcycle case "gored" the professor. and threatened him by ordering him to "put a 6" on him... explicitly clarifying "who is in charge"!”. Obviously as a corollary there are other videos found online on the same topic.
Ontologically and "by education received" accustomed to a normal education ( so to speak, my classmates and I stood up at the teacher's entrance ), I confess that I feel physical discomfort when I see those images again; in fact I saw them only once on the web and today on TV. I would expect unanimous condemnation "no ifs or buts" ( the "democrats" say this when someone touches on "untouchable" issues?), and an exemplary punishment ( I also think I've heard this phrase before...), in relation to the committed crime of, at a minimum, "outrage" when not "violence" against a public official . So, penal code in hand, I would like to hear expert lawyers examine the length of sentences to be given to those over the age of fourteen, attributable, and their parents. This from my point of view must be the starting point .
Then we can talk, we need to talk, of radiation from every school of order and degree.
And after that , if we have time, of "socially useful work", days cleaning toilets or bins...etc.
Surely, Then, in the end, also of basic skills or competences of the teacher in question...although in my opinion it makes me smile to hear the "outgoing minister" Fedeli threaten sensational measures today...The same minister who just a few months ago had brought to completion the implementation of the school reform (“good” I just can't say it), eliminating the conduct vote.
None of this .
The psychologist, he invited moderation and obviously recalled the importance of prevention; the teacher was concerned not to ruin the children's existence, for a certainly regrettable fact blablabla…BUT…!. In his opinion, failing them would be useless because it is not perceived as a punishment.
The most reactionary ( probably future suspects for anti-democratic behavior ), they quietly suggested a suspension...even a failure!
From my point of view it's a bit like giving DASPO to "fans" who commit crimes at the stadium...instead of throwing them in jail.
What do you think Director?? I don't think...
Good evening.
Roberto