L'internazionale populista di Bannon

Of Antonio Terrenzio
Bannon's populist international
Source: Conflicts and strategies
These days Steve Bannon is certainly the character who is causing the most talk in sovereignist circles
Trump's former chief strategist hit the headlines for having inaugurated the Movement”, the movement precisely, who should be the collector of all the sovereignist parties in Europe, from Marine Le Pen to the Austrian FPO, from Victor Orban to Matteo Salvini.
The idea of ​​Trump's advisor is to create a sort of foundation capable of financially supporting all the populist parties in Europe. The objective declared by the founder himself is to create an organization capable of facing theOpen Society of George Soros which he has over time financed with 32 billions of dollars, Ong, associations that promote immigration, freedom in bio/ethical issues such as abortion and euthanasia, lega LGBT ecc. Creating a movement Anti-Davos, capable of organizing the identity forces of all of Europe, the cosmopolitan elites and its progressive values.
On the threshold of the European elections next May, a "coalition of the right" will compete to take a third of the European parliament.
There therefore seem to be two factions on the field, one of a globalist nature, linked to left-wing parties and Sorosian finance; the other, a grouping of all the nationalist parties in Europe. Read More

Share

Orbán all'Europarlamento: "Non accettiamo minacce e ricatti. We will not be a homeland of immigration"

The Hungarian Prime Minister speaks before the plenary in Strasbourg “to defend Hungary which has been a member of the European family for a thousand years”

STRASBOURG – After partially anticipating his speech with several posts on his Facebook profile, the Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán spoke today in Strasbourg at the European Parliament hearing on Sargentini report in which it will be decided whether or not to sanction Budapest on violation of the rule of law. “You have already formed an idea about this relationship, and my intervention will not change your opinion, but I came anyway. You will not condemn a government, but Hungary which has been a member of the European family for a thousand years. I'm here to defend my homeland”, said the Hungarian prime minister, who defended his actions above all due to the broad consensus that his government receives at home. And really comforted by internal consensus, Orban had no problem taking sides directly against the European institutions: “Hungary will be condemned because it has decided that it will not be a homeland for immigration. But we will not accept threats and blackmail from pro-immigration forces: we will defend our borders, we will stop illegal immigration against you too, if necessary”. The leader of Fidesz, who is part of the European People's Party family in Brussels, he stated how the measures on immigration were taken on the basis of the will expressed by the Hungarian people: “We are the ones who defend our borders and only we can decide who to live with. We stopped hundreds and thousands of illegal migrants and defended Hungary and Europe. The Hungarians have decided that our homeland will not be a country of immigration.". Read More

Share

Bannon wants to conquer the EU with The Movement

Notice to sailors. Bannon wants to conquer the EU with The Movement
Of Francesco Bechis

Donald Trump's former chief strategist confides the details of the new European populist party to The Daily Beast. Inside Le Pen and Farage, but a place of honor is reserved for Matteo Salvini
A populist army marching towards Brussels to obtain a majority in the European Parliament and defeat "the Davos party" once and for all. A Foundation for populists, that gives life to the electoral campaign for the European elections of 2019 and puts together the crème of the crème of the Italian anti-establishment, Austrian, tedesco, French, British. An organization that challenges Open Society with foil, the billionaire's pro-migrant foundation George Soros, the six-headed Hydra for lovers of conspiracies and plots. The dream of Steve Bannon begins to take shape. After Trump's former chief strategist stormed the White House, dishonorably dismissed from Tycoon, he worked 24 hours a day to repeat the experiment in Europe. And if a widespread cliché dictates that the sequel to a film is unlikely to achieve the same success as the original, Sloppy Steve's European challenge may be the exception that proves the rule.
The Daily Beast, after hearing Bannon, revealed the first details. It will be called The Movement, it will be a right-wing party (but he will not despise the contribution of different voices, as long as the enemy remains the same: the European elites), will have its headquarters in Brussels and is already looking for staff to get the ball rolling. Money won't be a problem. Bannon doesn't care that much, he is still in disbelief that the Leave Brexit campaign achieved its goal with a budget of 7 million pounds: “When they told me that the spending limit was 7 millions I told him but you understand 70 millions?? Con 7 millions don't buy anything from us. Don't buy Facebook data from us, you don't buy advertising from us, Nothing".
In London, in the luxurious Mayfair hotel, the meeting that marked the beginning of the new political adventure. Together with Bannon and Raheem Kassam, former chief of staff of Nigel Farage and director of Breitbart, a large delegation from European anti-establishment movements showed up. Farage himself was there, Jerome Rivière of the National Rally (Ex Front National), Filip Dewinter of the Flemish Flemish Interest, the Republican congressman Paul Gosar (envoy of the very powerful Freedom Caucus, group of pro-Trump conservatives that Bannon wants to have on his side).
And then not exactly reassuring faces, Prominent exponents of ultra-right parties such as Sweden Democrats and True Finns who were initially supposed to stay out but at the last minute Bannon brought back because they were "perfect for the role". There is no news of the League's involvement in the London meeting. There is little chance, however, that the most hated strategist in America will not set the table with the most delicious dish, Matteo Salvini's League which is climbing the polls and conquers the spotlight every day with rejections at sea. Bannon has real admiration for the Italian Interior Minister. And if a place in the leadership of the Movement for Le Pen and Farage is already secured, it is unlikely that the Northern League secretary will remain out, which at the moment has a very different specific weight and knows a little about the dynamics of Strasbourg. Matteo Salvini's words in a very recent interview with the Washington Post dispel the doubts, to which he said he wanted to "put together a group that obtains a majority in the European Parliament".
The time has been ripe for a while now. La debacle del Front National, the ultra-right movement led by Marine Le Penin which Bannon had placed so much hope, seemed to have removed once and for all the danger of a populist international ready to take over Brussels. But in just under a year the rise of Eurosceptic forces in Austria, Holland and Germany and the sensational exploits of the League and the Five Star Movement 4 March they reopened the game. Meanwhile, Bannon has lost two jobs (at the White House and others Breitbart news, the all-news station dear to the far-right that he himself founded) and gained a new one, no less profitable: put in the time, money and expertise at the service of a new European populist movement.
We got wind of it two months ago, when he stopped in Rome on a European tour worthy of a rock star, exploding in an irrepressible enthusiasm for the imminent birth of a yellow-green government, fulfillment of a dream that Bannon would have liked to realize overseas, by his own admission, combining the impetuosity of Donald Trump with the charisma of Bernie Sanders. Not bad, life offered him another opportunity, and this time too the wind is blowing in his favor. Tic-tac, the hands run, the European elections are getting closer and the eurosceptics have a wild card on their side. Who wants a different Europe, liberals, moderate is warned: To stop Cyclone Bannon, something more will be needed than a few blue-starred flags on the streets of Brussels.

Read More

Share

Identity and sovereignty? They are inseparable notions

Of Alain de Benoist
Identity and sovereignty? They are inseparable notions
Source: Barbadillo
Signor Alain de Benoist, in some environments, we tend to oppose two notions that everyone talks about today: identity and sovereignty. Nel Front National, Marion Maréchal-Le Pen would have represented the first, in opposition to Florian Philippot, which above all defends the second. Such opposition seems legitimate to her?
“Interviewed a few weeks ago by Causer magazine, Marine Le Pen said: "My project is intrinsically patriotic because it defends the sovereignty and identity of France in the same movement. When you forget one of the two, and the bar". So, we don't cheat. Because they should see themselves in the identity and sovereignty of opposing ideas, when they are complementary? Sovereignty without identity is but an empty shell, identity without sovereignty has every possibility of transforming into ectoplasm. So you don't need to separate them. One and the other, Furthermore, they are part of freedom. To be sovereign is to be free to decide your own policy. Preserving one's identity implies, for a people, to be able to freely decide the conditions of one's own social reproduction".
While identity is a necessarily vague concept, sovereignty is no longer easy to define?
“Less than it seems. The “one and indivisible” sovereignty recalled by Jean Bodin in The Six Books of the Republic (1576) it has little to do with sovereignty based on subsidiarity and the principle of sufficient competence, of which Althusius speaks in 1603 in his Politica methodice digesta. Bodin's approach is eminently modern. It implies the nation-state and the disappearance of the distinction that was previously made between power (power) and the authority or dignity of power (authority). Read More

Share

The how and why of Populism

Of Umberto Bianchi
The how and why of Populism
Source: Heretically
At the end of a decidedly close electoral contest, the verdict that came out of the polls has, indiscutibilmente, rewarded all those formations that, somehow, they imitate or are themselves considered “populist”. The reference applies to both the League and the Movement 5 position, US President Trump, the transalpina Lady Marine Le Pen, That, in the most recent past for the Forza Italia of the golden times and, really, in very recent times, as if by someone risky, also for Renzi of the original "scrap" version. A term whose meaning has included a bit of everything and its opposite.
But what exactly do we mean by “populism”?? What is the exact political meaning in which this term should be placed, very fashionable nowadays? If we want to refer to the letter of the history of political movements, by “populism” we mean a series of movements that, at the end of the nineteenth century they developed in disparate contexts. In Russia, Populism was represented by the “narodnjki”, whose most authoritative exponents were the colonel and mathematics professor of the Military Academy Pyotr Lavrovič Lavrov, supporter of populism in a socialist key, together with its popularizer and idelogue, the sociologist and literary critic Nikolai Konstantinovič Mikhailovsky, having as its object the emancipation of the peasant masses, starting from the rural/"obscina" community. France instead, began with Paul Deroulede's League of Patriots, che unitasi ad un altro movimento populista di massa, Boulangism (named after Georges Boulanger, charismatic general of the French army) he became an advocate of a radical and revanchist nationalism, always connected to the increasingly widespread discontent of the masses, towards the young French parliamentary republic, much to achieve in 1888-89, after obtaining the support of the monarchists, of significant electoral victories. In the United States it was the People's Party (People’s Party), also known as Populist Party (Populist Party), summarily called "Populists”, which party was established in 1891 in the United States of America which, during the “populist” period, took hold towards the end of the 19th century. Supported by the lower classes, especially by cultivators hostile towards elites in general, had its peak between 1892 and the 1896. Read More

Share