Of Antonio Terrenzio

Source: Conflicts and strategies
These days Steve Bannon is certainly the character who is causing the most talk in sovereignist circles
Trump's former chief strategist hit the headlines for having inaugurated “the Movement”, the movement precisely, who should be the collector of all the sovereignist parties in Europe, from Marine Le Pen to the Austrian FPO, from Victor Orban to Matteo Salvini.
The idea of ​​Trump's advisor is to create a sort of foundation capable of financially supporting all the populist parties in Europe. The objective declared by the founder himself is to create an organization capable of facing theOpen Society of George Soros which he has over time financed with 32 billions of dollars, Ong, associations that promote immigration, freedom in bio/ethical issues such as abortion and euthanasia, lega LGBT ecc. Creating a movement Anti-Davos, capable of organizing the identity forces of all of Europe, the cosmopolitan elites and its progressive values.
On the threshold of the European elections next May, a "coalition of the right" will compete to take a third of the European parliament.
There therefore seem to be two factions on the field, one of a globalist nature, linked to left-wing parties and Sorosian finance; the other, a grouping of all the nationalist parties in Europe.
This is the general picture.
What we are interested in understanding here is whether Bannon's initiative represents an opportunity or holds risks, which we will try to analyze.
In an interview given to the Giornale.it correspondent Sebastiano Caputo, the leader ofAlt Right americana, trace the names of three countries on a piece of paper: Türkiye, Iran e China. “They are our enemies” from whom the West must defend itself. To do this,'It is necessary to incorporate Russia into the Western bloc and no longer see it as an "enemy".
Behind these relaxing intentions of Bannon, Trump's words of praise for Putin's Russia, the common commitment against terrorism, the usual project of cutting ties to Russia through "choke points" in Central Asia would re-emerge, where as always, the Eurosian game is being played.
Ankara, Theran and Beijing, they are listed as main enemies, only because the strategy of previous American administrations has failed, why, following that oriental saying “if you can't kill your menic, hug him", the new American strategy is actually a revisitation of the old Brezinski doctrine, which only apparently aims to harmonize relations with Russia but always creating scorched earth around it, so as to prevent the formation of the great Eurasian bloc.
As Caputo recalls, for the formation of a "green belt" around the former Soviet power, It is necessary to involve Saudi Arabia, India, Pakistan, Egypt and obviously Israel, the latter subject, to which we will return to better understand the figure of Bannon.
Then in Europe, the ally-enemy of all time, It's Germany. His economic independence, the reluctance to certain American dictates, such as opposition to sanctions on Iran and the plan to double the North Stream gas pipeline, they are bringing to the comb several unresolved issues between Washington and Berlin.
It is no coincidence that the yellow-green revolution was supported and promoted by the States, with great enthusiasm shown by both Bannon and Trump, precisely to weaken Germany. And it was precisely Italy that socio-political laboratory that saw the emergence of the "people against the elites" and which is having reverberations throughout the continent.
The dangers ,as we mentioned, are represented by the possibility that European identitarianisms could be swallowed up by a neo-conservative paradigm, which has been adapted to current times, with new myths and languages, is functional to American domination strategies.
The values ​​of theopen Society”, “right-humanism”, the volatilization of the economy, they are no longer the right tools, to manage this era of transition. This is probably why the Pentagon's "think tanks". (who are the real deciders of every game played in the USA), they marginalized “Wall Street”.
It is necessary to focus on "enlightened" capitalism, more attentive to people's needs and real development models.
What we are interested in understanding, it is as much as the US interest in European populism, is instrumental to the relaunch of American power politics, considering the millenarian rhetoric that Bannon uses and the countries he designates as enemies.
The obsession with Iran, the embrace of King Saud and above all the bond with Israel and Bibi Netanyahu, too convergent with the tradition of a certain American neoconservatism.
The true face of the editor of Braibhart, In short, it would be nothing other than that of a neocon, cloaked in a new populist language. Using populism to split and weaken the EU and at most to "hook" them to the new course of American politics.
How plausible it seems, There are several factors that give rise to many doubts about Trump's advisor and the authenticity of his project for a "right-wing international". Riding the populist wave, Therefore, but always being careful of the actors who try to tame it to strategic interests, which is good to remember, they are always those from Washington.