A left in a clear crisis of consensus had promised that, in view of the next European elections, would have brought the students to the streets.

And he did so last Friday thanks to the dense network of supporters he still has in schools: supporters who report to social centers, clubs and area associations that threw themselves headlong into the venture. And which they now promise to repeat every Friday until the end of the school year.
That the students then had the somewhat confused ideas on everything related to environmental disruption it was easy to believe. Which is demonstrated by a video (https://www.ilmessaggero.it/video/clima_2-4366040.html) of The Messenger which went around the web.
What world does it mean if teachers give their little ones the green light for a general "bigiata" in the name of anything?, you can be sure that students will not have to do it twice.
But the lack of information on climate-related problems, made up of poorly digested clichés, should also take into account who does not share the general vulgate.

This is the case of Italian physicist and popularizer Antonino Zichichi, class 1929, expert in elementary particle physics and professor emeritus of the physics department of the University of Bologna who in an interview with The Morning a few years ago he declared that the global warming evoked by scientists would be the biggest hoax of all time.
It is worth rereading what the great Italian scientist declared at the time, someone who has received honors all over the world for his studies.
“We prohibit putting poisons into the air with draconian laws” but let's remember that “the greenhouse effect is another matter entirely, and we humans have little to do with it. I challenge climate scientists to prove to me that in a hundred years the Earth will be overheated. The history of climate change is an opinion, a mathematical model that claims to demonstrate the unprovable. We scholars can barely say what the weather will be like in fifteen days, let alone in a hundred years”.
And then Zichichi asks himself: “In the name of what reason does it claim to describe the future scenarios of the Earth and the therapies to save it, if the mechanisms that support the climate engine are still unknowable? Divinations”.
The scientist explained that “to say what the weather will be like in many years, we should be able to describe the evolution of time moment by moment in both space and time. But this evolution also feeds on changes produced by evolution itself. It is a three-equation system that has no analytical solution”.
So – the interviewer asked – why do many scientists agree on global warming?
“Because they built good mathematical models as needed. They resort to too many free parameters, arbitrary. They alter the calculations with assumptions to make the results prove them right. But the scientific method is something else”.
E “we need to clearly distinguish between climate change and pollution. Pollution exists, it is harmful, and calls into question the actions of man. But attributing global warming to human responsibility is an enormity without any foundation: pure cultural pollution. Human action affects the climate by no more than ten percent. Ninety percent, climate change is governed by natural phenomena of which scientists to date, as I said, they do not know and cannot know possible future developments. But I'm optimistic”.