Reporting of www.unavox.it
Of Francesca de Villasmundo
Published on the site Medias Presse Info
After bishops consecrating during a Paul VI Mass and after the homophilous declarations by the Brazilian Jesuit Luis Corrêa Lima, here is another desecration carried out in the country of syncretism par excellence!
In the parish of San Gerardo Magela of the archdiocese of Sorocoba, in the State of Sao Paulo, [on the eve of Easter] the monstrance containing the Blessed Sacrament arrived on the "table" carried by a "drone", moved by a boy with the help of a girl, amidst the cheers and applause of the delirious crowd of faithful.
The parish priest who allows such sacrilege, believes in the Real Presence? He consecrated the species of bread and wine?
It is more than conceivable that one would have serious doubts about the validity of such Novus Ordo ceremonies, disheartening spectacles of a conciliar world gone mad!
The Council wanted to open the Catholic Church to the world, adapt the faith to "separated brothers", speak contemporary language... the result is a not at all silent apostasy, but noisy and vulgar, sacrilege from blasphemy.
In the parish of San Gerardo Magela of the archdiocese of Sorocoba, in the State of Sao Paulo, [on the eve of Easter] the monstrance containing the Blessed Sacrament arrived on the "table" carried by a "drone", moved by a boy with the help of a girl, amidst the cheers and applause of the delirious crowd of faithful.
The parish priest who allows such sacrilege, believes in the Real Presence? He consecrated the species of bread and wine?
It is more than conceivable that one would have serious doubts about the validity of such Novus Ordo ceremonies, disheartening spectacles of a conciliar world gone mad!
The Council wanted to open the Catholic Church to the world, adapt the faith to "separated brothers", speak contemporary language... the result is a not at all silent apostasy, but noisy and vulgar, sacrilege from blasphemy.
I have more doubts that the Real Presence is lacking in Novus Ordo ceremonies, given the distortion even of the very words of Our Lord during the consecration, compared to the usual Mass. E’ just an idle doubt or there is validity?
@Gin, you perfectly captured the fundamental essence of the problem. The conciliar ambiguity and the resulting rite which incredibly distances itself from Catholic doctrine, it largely leaves one to assume that those who preside over such assemblies believe in a memorial, to a memory of the Last Supper, like the Protestants.
Moreover, we have declarations and writings from members of the modernist conciliar neo-church who question or even deny the Real Presence. In the bad, we can say that in addition to the obvious scandal there is no real profanation because anyone who is not a true priest cannot validly consecrate. So the nonsense is done on a piece of bread and not on a consecrated Host. We understand that there remains one consolation, but not so thin because in reality there is no profanation, in the absence of a validly consecrated Host.