Of Israel Shamir

Source: Comedonchisciotte
Like an orange hurricane, President Trump has overwhelmed the Old World. Visits by American presidents to Europe are usually a cosmetic operation. Not this time. Since the time of the Mongol invasion, not many visitors from outside have shaken Europe like he has. The president of the United States has finally freed himself from the cage built by his political opponents and started saying things that his voters wanted to hear.
His bold statements were, however, quickly undermined and disavowed by his minister advisors, creating the feeling that Trump speaks only for himself. Him too, in the end, he repudiated his own claims, saying he was misunderstood.
Trump increasingly seems like the protagonist of “The Prince and the Pauper”, the poor boy who happens to become king – and starts behaving unregally, showing mercy and caring for people. His own court ignores his commands. Trump says what people want to hear, but his administration sticks to its line.
During the first part of his journey he played the part of the rebel, in a world of weak men and formidable women. The West is in fact governed by powerful aunts and older sisters. Aunt Angela in Germany, Aunt Teresa in England, Aunt Brigitte in France. All that was missing was Aunt Hillary to complete the puzzle and establish complete dominion over her subjugated nephews.
(However, Clinton's defeat did not derail the Aunts' castration program: the #MeToo campaign continues unabated. Men are afraid to flirt with girls. Henry (Superman) Cavill said in an interview that flirting with someone would be like "throwing myself into the fires of hell", as a public person. “I think a woman should be courted and chased”, he said, but that it could lead to prison. He was immediately attacked for this heresy: “If Henry Cavill doesn't want to be called a rapist, all he has to do is… not rape anyone”, they said. And he apologized profusely).
Trump's trip was accompanied by mass protests. Normally I'm in favor of a good anti-American demonstration, but in this case the protesters were extreme feminists and supporters of unlimited immigration. Those are people who like Aunts, and who hates Uncles. The problem for them is not the conflict with Russia or the fact that Trump is an alleged “Russian agent”. What they don't like is that he doesn't obey his Aunts.
In the second part of the tour, Trump met the formidable Putin, a real man. Now that we have learned from our reliable sources what happened in the sumptuous halls of Helsinki (apart from private face-to-face talks), we can share our findings with you.
In short, President Trump said the right things and asked for the right solutions, but he was unable to insist on any. If he had been a man free from conditioning, this journey would transform the world. As things are, it will remain only a sign of his honorable intentions, as everything he said was overturned and denied by his aides.
A Bruxelles, Trump attacked Merkel. How dare he buy Russian gas, if Germany faces a Russian threat? Because it accepts immigrants and refugees who undermine the European way of life? Saying this, he sided with the “populists”, the Italians, the Hungarians and the Austrians, whose rulers are male and friendly with Trump and Putin.
The Brussels meeting almost brought about the downfall of NATO. Trump has hinted that the United States will leave NATO unless it pays. They have to pay more, much more, if they want to have American protection.
He spoke seriously? NATO is an instrument of American control over Europe, and Washington maintains dozens of bases in Europe, particularly in Germany, under occupation since 1945. This would seem good for America, but the controlled states of Western Europe are linked to the Clinton clan, you have a Democrat and you have a liberal. They do not accept Trump as their legitimate ruler. And Europe does not pay for its occupation, so the game is expensive. Right, It is a great honor to occupy and control the great powers of the past, England, France, Netherlands, Spain. However, it costs America a lot of money. Likewise, in the 1990s Russia discovered that it was expensive to control cantankerous East Germany, independent Poland, sunny Georgia, the deceptive Armenia, populous Uzbekistan and the rainy Baltic States.
There is no certainty that European countries will agree to pay and accept Trump's demands. In Germany, the voices of those who want American soldiers to leave the country are growing. It would be good if NATO were to disintegrate and disappear, how the Warsaw Treaty Organization disappeared. Trump has repeatedly said he wants to bring American soldiers home. Perhaps we will see Pax Americana without American troops in Europe, as England fictitiously claimed to belong to the Roman Empire, even though the Roman legions were gone, and Rome had lost all interest in foggy Albion.
In England, Trump confronted May. She reminded him of his school teacher, and Donald doesn't like school teachers. Soft Brexit, which May intends to conclude, it's a real disappointment, not a Brexit, he said. According to the proposed treaty, all prerogatives remain in Brussels. There can therefore be no trade agreement between the United States and Great Britain. America will negotiate directly with Brussels. E, in general, It would be better if May gave way to Downing Street 10 to his former Foreign Minister, a supporter of Brexit, the carrot skin Bojo (as the English call the recently resigned Boris Johnson, resented the proposed soft Brexit plan).
The European Union is also an American project. Why, At that time, the US president wants to undermine it by removing the UK, its Trojan horse? Apparently, it means that globalist forces have entered a state of direct confrontation with America.
This first part of Trump's tour was followed with satisfaction by the Kremlin. The latter also believes that NATO has become obsolete and that Brexit is the right step. Russia instinctively disapproves of mass migration, just like Trump.
The Trump-Putin meeting has been postponed for a year, although they were both looking for each other. Trump wanted to meet another strongman, a powerful tribal leader who can help him build a new world, instead of the one created, under Obama, by the media and by Supreme Court Justices. Putin wanted to resolve bilateral issues and relieve American pressure on Russia.
Their problems are very different. Trump's main problems are Clinton, Obama and the army of their stubborn followers who do not want to recognize Trump's legitimacy. Putin couldn't do much for him, despite all his kindness.
Putin's problem is the hybrid war waged by the United States against Russia. Despite the accusations you hear in your media (alleged Russian ads on Facebook and Twitter to influence voters), American pressure on Russia is very real and very painful. US officials seek to destroy every international agreement Russia attempts to sign. He's not alone, or not even mainly, a weapons problem. If country A wants to sell to the Russians, for example, banana, the US ambassador will go to the king, the dal minister, in A, and will expressly prohibit him from selling bananas to the Russians. If he didn't accept, that country should not expect American help, or do not count on his favors in disputes with neighbors, or that the United States buys its production, or that US banks review their financial transactions. You saw the crazy Nikki Haley scene, US ambassador to the UN, who threatened sovereign nations with severe punishment for voting against America's wishes; you therefore have an idea of ​​the tact with which the Yankees want to convey their ideas.
The Russians find themselves in a very awkward position. All their neighbors are subject to American pressure, whether it's Georgia (that once, led by American and Israeli advisors, it also attacked Russia militarily) or Ukraine (the Americans staged a coup and installed a government in Kiev that was extremely hostile to Russia). American military bases surround it, NATO troops are getting ever closer to its centers. The American military budget of 600 billion dollars surpasses the Russian one, while the arms race can undermine its finances. If Russia were a woman, he would scream: stop it!
Perhaps our colleague Andrei Martyanov is right and the United States cannot destroy Russia militarily; perhaps Immanuel Wallerstein is right and American power is in decline; ma, in the meantime, they are perfectly capable of making life difficult for any state. It has made life unbearably difficult for North Korea, and extremely difficult for Iran. Russia is not doing half the good it could do without incessant American meddling.
Putin would like Trump to give in. There is no reason for Russia to be relentlessly targeted; he is no longer a communist; it is much smaller and less populous than the former Soviet Union; he wants to live in peace as a member of the family of nations, not as a great alternative. The anti-Russian offensive began in earnest under previous US presidents, i.e. Obama and Clinton; it would therefore make sense for Trump to stop it.
The problem is that he too is actively engaged in a war against Russia. Only a few days ago he pressured Merkel to give up North Stream-2, to stop buying Russian gas. His advisers have called for Turkey to abandon the purchase of a Russian anti-missile system. The US Air Force bombed Russian troops in Syria.
However, Putin made a good attempt. He proposed holding a referendum in the Donbass area, in eastern Ukraine, currently independent but without international recognition. The people of Donbass held their own referendum in 2014, and voted for independence; the Kiev regime and its Western sponsors have denied its validity, as it was done under the protection of the Russian army, they stated. Now Putin has proposed a repeat under international auspices.
Trump clearly agreed, he said it was a good idea, and asked John Bolton's opinion, his National Security Advisor; Bolton confirmed the validity of the idea. This in Helsinki; since then, however, the idea was rejected by America, given that the Kiev regime opposed it. The regime knows well that Eastern Ukrainians are not inclined to opt for its tender mercy; on the other hand, the Trump administration will not push Kiev to accept secession, or to respect the Minsk agreements and let them rejoin federal Ukraine as an autonomous unit. This wound on Russia's western border will therefore continue to bleed.
As for Syria, Putin told Trump he agreed to the deals made with Netanyahu, to keep the Iranians and their militias around 80 km from the disengagement lines (1974) on the Golan Heights (the Iranians are going through a difficult time and have accepted this solution without saying a word). Trump agreed, and both stressed that they hold Israeli security in high regard.
(For different reasons: Putin wants Syria to remain at peace under Assad, his protégé and ally, e, because of this, it needs some security agreement with aggressive Israel. Putin is aware of the Jewish state's ability to act behind the scenes and therefore does not want to antagonize it. He also wants Trump to be happy, and Israel is a point of enormous importance for the president of the United States, much more than for Putin.
Trump makes sacrifices on the altar of Israel to appease the Jews he fights internally. It goes against everything American Jews stand for, against everything they have achieved recently. He wants them to go back to the accounting department to count his money. But they want a lot, much more: dominate and govern America as they please. Trump is ready to concede everything possible to Israel, precisely to keep American Jews happy.
This ploy had also been attempted by the German National Socialists in the 1930s, when they granted the Zionist-socialists the profitable Ha'avara agreement to compensate and overcome the hostility of American Jews. It failed then, likely to fail again, but not before the Zionists get everything they want).
For North Korea, Putin praised Trump's move and said he would continue to support American efforts.
For the "Russian interference in American elections" nonsense, Putin has proposed establishing a bilateral group of experts on cybersecurity. Let the experts take care of it, he said. Trump agreed, although his advisors promptly repudiated the idea upon their return to Washington.
Putin also proposed allowing cross-examinations, on the basis of reciprocity: U.S. investigators will travel to Russia and question Russian officials indicted by Mueller's team; Russian investigators, on the other hand, will travel to the United States and question Ambassador McFaul about his involvement in the Browder case. Trump was impressed by the generous offer; but when he returned to Washington, McFaul ha (falsely) claimed that Trump intended to send him to the Gulag, and the president's advisors promptly rejected the proposal.
Putin had no intention of arresting and detaining McFaul, just question him; the same way, he would not have allowed Mueller's investigators to take Russian intelligence officers to a Guantanamo of their choice, just to ask them questions. The Browder Affair gets bigger as time goes on: although the scoundrel is not the biggest looter of Russian goods, was the most explicit and the most attached to stolen goods. American consultants from top universities planted in the Yeltsin administration in the 1990s had stolen more; they also facilitated the creation of the powerful oligarchs of that time. Browder, However, had more tenacity and judiciously invested a large portion of its illicit profits in bribes, aiming to suborn the US administration and plagiarize it against Russia. McFaul covered up for him and his misdeeds, as well as trying to interfere in the Russian electoral process, following the precedent established in '96.
And so, ad Helsinki, a pattern has been established, I was told by a witness. Putin makes a proposal, Trump tentatively agrees, only to promptly deny and deny it upon his return to Washington.
From start to finish, the US media has been very hostile to the president and his mission in Europe. They enthusiastically followed the anti-Trump demonstrations and pointed out his every mistake. Google, obedient, went after the former CIA chief's tweets where he calls Trump "a traitor". All the main Western newspapers talked about Trump's "betrayal"..
Maybe they would have been able to convince some Republicans to follow the trend, But Republican Mark Sanford's defeat in the South Carolina primary after Trump's angry tweets brought them back down to earth. A Republican leader said it well: “Obviously there are his critics regardless. This committee, however, is strong, he backs him and wants to support him. We are interested not only in the elections of 2018, but also to those of 2020".
The result of the violent “Trump is a traitor” campaign was astonishing: 80% of his voters approved what was done in Helsinki, despite the vehement accusations. The American media has lost its silver touch. The president can continue to build his power structure, and maybe one day his word will be worth something.
Conclusion: Trump dared, and he survived.
Source: /www.unz.com
Link: https://www.unz.com/ishamir/helsinki-secrets/
Translation for www.comedonchisciotte.org by HMG