Prime Minister Conte's announcement following input from Minister Salvini: Italy will not even participate in the Marrakech summit in December
Global Compact, not Italy – Italy suspends membership of the Global Compact on immigration, the pact signed by beyond 190 Countries the 19 September 2016 and renamed “New York Declaration“.
We explain why the “Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration” (GCM), that is, the first world treaty sponsored by the UN, you effectively eliminate borders.
For this United States, Hungary, Austria, Croatia, Czechia, Slovakia and other countries decided not to sign it: the risks of governments losing control of their borders are too evident.
The objection made by those in favor is that the treaty would be "non-binding": but then you don't understand why you should sign something that is useless. Instead it is useful, to liberalize immigration. Dealing the final blow to our national sovereignty.
Read More
 |
Tens of thousands of “migrants”, from Bosnia, they are breaking through the Croatian border. “Al 95% young males, all armed with knives. A policeman has already been stabbed. There are no longer any Syrians among them. They are mostly Pakistani, but also Moroccans, Algerians, Iranians . They want to go to Germany and the Scandinavian countries. And everyone – says the Croatian police…
Read all.
 |
So Nikki Haley resigned as US ambassador to the UN. The stupid one, poorly educated, anti-Putinian fanatic, super-Israeli and neocon Nikki Haley, creature of the Deep State that has been trying to undermine President Trump since April, when he announced new sanctions on Russia with the excuse that its companies had collaborated with Damascus to manufacture chemical weapons – …
Read all.
Of Francesca Romana Poleggi
More and more invasive, The propaganda and diffusion of early sexual education by international organizations is pressing and coercive, which in theory should be devoted to the protection of true human rights, especially the weakest subjects. Few people know, for example, that already in the distant past 1999 UNICEF had published a manual explaining that you can get pleasure from sex with things, the animals, minors or with non-consenting people (cfr.: Sexual and reproductive health workshop for mothers and pregnant adolescents – Program for the prevention and comprehensive care of pregnancy in adolescents, page 89).
We reported at the time a documentary by Family Watch International with a very eloquent title: The war against children: the UN agenda for global sexuality education, the Comprehensive Sex Education (CSE). The CSE is promoted at the United Nations by documents aimed at affirming highly questionable 'sexual rights', especially where they consist of radical and unscrupulous sexual 'education' even for very young children. Many are familiar with the Standards for Sexuality Education in Europe, published by the WHO a few years ago. Among the different ones, serious critical issues include, for example, the claim to educate about sexuality outside and without the knowledge of the family, which is prejudicially considered incompetent in this regard; there is a claim to convey information to children in the age group 0-4 years on “joy and pleasure in touching one's body – early infantile masturbation”. Of course, experts in the world of childhood know well that the act of exploring one's body, also in the genital area, it is natural in children. However, it is not understandable why there should be 'specialists' who instruct children - perhaps 'in groups' - on a practice linked to infantile spontaneity, without taking into account the intimacy of each individual and the different degrees of psychophysical development. Read More
Of Nicola Porro
Leek soup: press review of September 11th 2018
00:00 Him, le schizophrenia di Michelle Bachelet, the lady who calls us racist.
04:28 (Stra)speaks Alessandro Di Battista and tension rises (but how many times do they make this title) between Lega and M5stelle.
06:54 Sui shops closed on Sundays another partial reverse. But not too much.
09:47 Copyright, the newspapers all lined up on one side. I'll tell you my opinion (against the current)…
11:55 Enel and advertising, Marco Travaglio makes the phenomenon.
13:23 Turin-Lyon, here are all the numbers. And they still talk to us about cost-benefit analyses.
14:03 The story of the two convicts whom the crickets recover by whistling.
Source: https://www.nicolaporro.it/zuppa-di-porro/8307-2/ Read More
Of Fulvio Scaglione
Source: linkiesta
Of Luigi Tedeschi
Source: Italicum
With the implosion of the West, Europe will also end?
Trump's decision to have the US withdraw from the nuclear deal with Iran, with the relative restoration of the economic embargo, could lead to a rift with serious consequences in relations between Europe and the United States. Probably Trump's breakup, with the doctrine of America First, compared to Obama's foreign policy, it will mean the end of the West itself, as a geopolitical area that identified itself in the Atlantic alliance between the USA and Western Europe, arose at the end of the Second World War.
With Trump, American unilateralism in foreign policy is reaffirmed and Obama's multilateralism declines, as a phase of American geopolitics characterized by the decline of the world primacy of the USA, due to the emergence of new continental powers, such as Russia, at dinner, India and to a lesser extent Iran itself. Emerging powers have brought about the end of the era of American expansionism on a global scale, established following the collapse of the USSR.
Europe's role in the world itself has undergone a drastic reduction, both economic and political. In fact, Europe is not a unitary political institution, but only an economic-monetary union, which from a geopolitical point of view has not been able to free itself from American dominance. Therefore Europe remained strongly involved in American decline in the world, paying the consequences of their subordination. Read More
Of Fulvio Scaglione
Source: Fulvio Scaglione
The Iranian crisis, much announced and finally exploded, will test the European Union. It is not the first time that the EU has had to demonstrate its virtues, and the results were not brilliant. This, but, it could be the last because the cancellation of the Treaty signed in 2015 with the government of Hassan Rouhani it could decree the end of any attempt to give Europe a political physiognomy.
The question is very simple. According to the European Union (and also the UN and Russia, moreover), the agreement of 2015, built to block Iran's path to military nuclear power, works, Iran respects the pacts and there is no reason to cancel it after such a short time. According to the USA (and also Israel and Saudi Arabia), on the contrary, the agreement is full of holes, it offers no security guarantees and Iran lies, because he continues to try to prepare the atomic bomb.
It would be difficult to imagine a sharper difference of opinion than this. Which is furthermore broadened by questions of economic interest. The USA wants to favor traditional partners in the Persian Gulf, who are, among other things, much richer than the Iranians. Europe has a long and cordial commercial tradition with Iran, enjoyed above all by Italy and Germany. Our country is now the second largest exporter to Iran (especially mechanical and chemical industries) and the second importer (especially oil) after Germany, first in both sectors. In the 2011 commercial relationships between Italy and Iran they reached their peak, with a value of 11 billions of euros. In the 2012 sanctions, also imposed by the EU, they caused the value of a to collapse 1,3 billion, but the projections for the 2018 they talk about 3 billion, therefore we are rapidly regaining our former positions. Read More
Of Massimo Fini
Source: Massimo Fini
That Abu Mazen's statements (the Jews would be somehow responsible for the Shoah) are unacceptable, as he immediately declared, among others, also the European Union, there's no need to even say it. One wonders though, as a reader of Il Fatto did (27.4), Mauro Chiostri, talking about today and not about the codified yesterday, whether the State of Israel does not enjoy a special safe conduct based precisely on the Jewish extermination of three-quarters of a century ago. It's a question, for the truth, which many people do but which they do not dare to express publicly for fear of being immediately branded as anti-Semitic, deniers, racists, Nazis. But Israel is a state and should not be confused with the international Jewish community. In less Manichaean years than the ones we are currently experiencing, it was the Jewish community itself that did not want such confusion to arise. And it was logical that this should be the case. Because Israel is a state and, as such, can perform objectionable actions, and even nefarious, but that doesn't mean he has to answer for it, let's say, a Jew from the Rome ghetto. Today, however, this confusion exists and Israel can carry out acts with impunity that would cost other states indignant condemnation, if not worse, of the so-called 'international community'. Read More
