Long live Saint Pius!

Image results for Saint Pius
Although not adhering to the Cassiciacum Thesis, as widely known, the Christus Rex Circle shares and recognizes itself in the observations of this article in every anti-modernist statement
Giuseppe Federici Study Center – For a new onset
Press release no. 63/18 of the 3 September 2018, Saint Pius X
We celebrate the feast of Saint Pius (n. 69, July 2018), which indicates the anti-modernist doctrinal line to follow in order to remain faithful to the teaching of the holy pontiff.
Editorial of the Sodalitium magazine, n. 69 July 2018
“The hiatus between the statements of the 19th century Popes and the new vision that begins with Pacem in Terris is evident and there has been much debate about it. It also lies at the heart of Lefebvre and his followers' opposition to the Council.". It is not the first time that Joseph Ratzinger expresses his opinion on the irreconcilability between the teaching of the Church (“the statements of the Popes of the 19th century”) and the modern one (O human dignity - come who - Peace on earth): we have already talked about it in relation to his greeting speech to the Roman Curia of 22 December 2005, his Membership no. 59, pp. 41-43. The hiatus (in the figurative sense of “interruption”, “solution of continuity”) it is therefore "evident", that is, immediately and totally comprehensible.

Read More

Share

WE INTEGRALIST BIGOTS WITH OUR ROSARIES AND OUR SANTINI

Of Silvana De Mari
Christianity has become a very nice religion, malleable, ductile, questionable, portionable, flexible, compatible with everything and everyone, vegetarian, gay- friendly, sustainable and low impact, low cost, à la carte, ready-to-wear, self service, just take what you want and pay only for that. Christianity has become a snowflake religion (in English Snowflake, a term that indicates someone who melts and spamps if you so much as look at him badly) and above all very gracious priests, some more glossy and some more casual, who present us with their boyfriends who are even cuter than them. We can say that Christianity was brought to the end-of-season sales. A Christianity in pastel shades, delicate and soft like the chasubles used in Dublin, carefully devoid of any Christian symbol ( it is divisive) and closed by a sort of slightly Celtic and slightly esoteric circle.
From Dublin they let us know that "do not commit impure acts" means do not pick your nose. As we sink into a pretty pastel Christianity, round and plump like cotton candy with whipped cream on top, we seemed to remember that we were supposed to be the salt of the earth, something that burns on the wounds, but it sterilizes and cleans: because only through pain and shame is the path to true glory, redemption, purity, that's why you need salt, not cotton candy. It seemed to us that at a certain point Jesus Christ even overturned tables and whipped people and, above all, declared himself the Son of the Father, the Father being the God of Hosts and the One who destroyed Sodom with fire. Read More

Share

If we abolish the Sacred, It's not worth living

Reporting of BastaBugie editorial team
I'm about to start the brigade ”two plus two equals four”, where we will fight to the death to defend the obvious (VIDEO: two plus two equals four)

Of Silvana De Mari

(AUTOMATIC READING)
Among the gifts asked eight months ago at Christmas from Baby Jesus: peace for persecuted Christians, a home for earthquake victims in the cold, in total cold, more absolute, in the cold of a government that certainly didn't love them, and for us courage, infinite courage, because that's what we need now to avoid being overwhelmed.
Many pastors have abandoned, they betrayed, they sold themselves, the sheep are alone before the wolves.
We ask Christ for the courage to become sheepdogs, those who defend the flock from the most total lies, the first of which is the loss of the sacred, the loss of God's gaze, the reduction of Christ's message to a very selective pauperism.
Once the sense of the sacred is lost, the distinction between good and evil becomes blurred, right and wrong, true and false. The loss of the sacred is the loss of the way that Christ came to open.
The sense of the sacred means waking up and knowing that God knows you are there, walk, write, tidy up the kitchen and know that you are in God's gaze. Read More

Share

Saint Bernard of Clairvaux, Abbot and Doctor of the Church

In the night between 20 and the 21 August celebrates the greatness of this great Saint
At twenty-two he becomes a monk, taking with him about thirty relatives. The monastery is the one founded by Robert of Molesmes in Cîteaux (Cistercium in latino, hence Cistercians). A 25 years send him to found another in Clairvaux, uninhabited countryside, who becomes his and the monks' Clara Vallis. It's confidential, almost shy. But the character is there. Pope and Church are his fixed stars, but many ecclesiastics go against him. He is also severe with the monks of Cluny, in his opinion too smooth, with overly adorned churches, “while the poor is hungry”.
He asks his Cistercians for fewer functions, less reading and a lot of work. He hurls his plowing myths at uncultivated Europe, apostles with the hoe, who bring earth and water to order, and with them the animals, changing European history with effort and prayer. And him, the boss, he is often called upon for top missions, like when he travels throughout Europe to make Pope Innocent II recognized there (Gregorio Papareschi) undermined by the antipope Pietro de' Pierleoni (Anacleto II). And the schism ends, with the help of his prestige, of his persuasive force, but above all of his humility. This ascetic, but, he is not always able to appreciate those who explore other paths of faith. Bernardo harshly attacks the Trinitarian doctrine of Gilberto Porretano, bishop of Poitiers. And he condemns the teaching of Peter Abelard (professor of theology and logic in Paris) which heralds Thomas Aquinas and Bonaventure. Read More

Share

INDUCING AND ABANDONNING – Semantic gloss

The result of the image through the Our Fatherof the Prof. Luciano Pranzetti

It is not our intention to intervene, with biblical/theological arguments, on the announced and reiterated Bergoglian intention to modify, In the Our Father, the expression "Do not lead us into temptation” in favor of another less allusive one – according to the opinionated theologians of the Vatican-secondist neochurch – to a God who delights in wanting evil for his creatures. E, because of this, without waiting for a definitive decision by the Hierarchy, already in some French dioceses, as well as in many Italian churches, please with the new replacement formula "Don't abandon us to temptation”. Authoritative interventions have been produced on the subject which, without any shadow of a doubt, have demonstrated how inappropriate and incorrect such a new translation of the Greek text is "kai mè eisenègkes emàs éis peirasmòn “ (Mt. 6, 13) That, given to be authentic and unchangeable Word of Jesus (Mt. 24, 35), corresponds to the Latin "and do notlead into temptation”, as Saint Jerome well understood in the canonical version of the 'Vulgate'. We would like to demonstrate, Instead, like the new formula, far from the intention of making the figure of the Father distant from any connotation of malevolence and injustice but only designed with mercy, harden it and make it worse by handing over to Catholicism the idea of ​​an evil God, distant and disinterested in the events and fate of his creatures. Therefore, with the sole etymological/logical/semantic analysis of the two verbs INDURRE and ABANDONARE, it will be possible to realize a vision that, referring to the second, manifests itself to be stronger than the first e, really, blasphemous. We see, At that time, because the two verbs express opposite semantics.

1INDUCE: verb that, in the various and multiple circumstances in which it is flexed, it means a dynamism with which a subject pushes and/or is pushed to behave, to unbecoming attitudes, come: “mislead, lead to crime". Ora, if we carefully consider the etymology and semantics, you can see how, in the compound in-duce, there is an initial motion to which the subject is connected, he is not necessarily forced to give in, so much so that we can speak of an incitement to commit crime which did not materialize due to an opposing will. Scripture informs us that God tests, but this does not mean that man is required to respond to temptation, term this that, among other things, it configures a circumstance in which an attempt is made, operation, Meaning what, who tries to solicit something but not necessarily complete it. Read More

Share

15 August: Holy Virgin Mary Assumption into Heaven, soul and body

Related image
 
The pagan holiday of Ferragosto has been replaced in the Gregorian calendar, like many other holidays, from that of the Madonna, Assumption into Heaven. Tomorrow, feast of obligation.
 
Written and reported by Father Maria Romualdo Lafitte
At the link below, the illustrated work of the Reverend Father, sent to our site:

bella vita ND it x send

 
Read More

Share

Who says capital punishment is, in itself, bad, falls into heresy

of the Prof. Roberto De Mattei

The lawfulness of the death penalty is a truth to be held by faith, defined by the ordinary and universal Magisterium of the Church, in a constant and unequivocal manner. Who says capital punishment is, in itself, bad, falls into heresy.

The teaching of the Church was clearly expressed in the letter of 18 December 1208, in which Innocent III condemns the Waldensian position, with these words, reported by Denzinger: «We assert a secular power, that without mortal sin he can exercise the judgment of blood, provided that I do not hate to take revenge, but by judgment, not carelessly, but let him proceed in consultation» ( A handbook of symbols,definitions and declarations on matters of faith and morals, edited by Peter Hünermann S.J., n. 795). (As for secular power, we affirm that the death penalty can be exercised without mortal sin, provided that revenge is exercised not out of hatred, but by judgment, not in an imprudent way, but in moderation).

The same position was reiterated by Catechism of the Council of Trent (Part three, n. 328), dal Catechism maggiore of Saint Pius (Part three, n. 413) and from the new Catechism of the Catholic Church (n. 2267) (albeit invalid because legislated by illegitimate authorities, n.d.r.). Pope Francis (Il “not-pope” Francesco, n.d.r.) he has now signed a rescript that modifies the Catechism (of the Conciliar Counter-Church itself, n.d.r.) with this new formulation: «The Church teaches, in the light of the Gospel, that 'the death penalty is inadmissible because it attacks the inviolability and dignity of the person', and is committed with determination to its abolition throughout the world». Read More

Share

Because the death penalty is Christian

BECAUSE THE DEATH PENALTY IS CHRISTIAN

WHY’ THE DEATH PENALTY E’ CHRISTIAN

“But look, is there anyone who still believes that "this" (neo)Church has a modicum of authority left!”. This is what I said to myself when I received angry and saddened letters, and friends have sent me critical articles on Bergoglio's last act: the correction of the Catechism on the death penalty. For two thousand years the Church, his saints and doctors (therefore infallible) they have …
Read all.

Read More

Share

Saint Paul: "chi non vuol lavorare, don't even eat" (parasite!)

Report www.unavox.it
Of L. P.

Days ago, during a reclamation intervention on a 'Roma camp' – the River Village in Rome is named with posh Anglomania – carried out by the police in the last week of July, the director of Avvenire, the out of tune organ of the CEI, he came out with a comment saying that “No man is ever a parasite”, the intent to transform is evident, with a cultural procedure – alchemical, the reality of an ethnicity that largely qualifies for exlege behavior, as a model of social and economic efficiency.
Affirm, to be precise, that no man is ever a parasite definitely means that, for the fact of "being a person", also a lifestyle, characterized by illicit activities or abulìa - and the evidence in support of such an evident reality is innumerable - must be recognized as a sign of an objective value.
It is not the purpose of our intervention to dwell on the political aspects, social, judicial authorities in which one or another Roma community is very often accused. Our aim will be, Instead, that of denying and dismantling the 'maxim' uttered by Marcus Tarquinius, director of Avvenire, highlighting its groundlessness and its contingent functionality to its gratuitous desire for controversy.
We are convinced of the concrete anthropological reality of the individual that universal common opinion defines as 'parasite', but it is not on this belief of ours that we will base the critical information given to the aforementioned director. The 'auctoritates' which confirm the existence of the 'parasitic type' both in economic and existential terms are very different.
This word indicates an animal or vegetal organism that lives at the expense of another, for axiological transport, a person who lives by exploiting others. Modern borrowing from classical languages: dal Latin parasite (parasite is the feminine.), freeloading guest, maintained; from the Greek parasites, who eats at other people's tables – from sitos, food, with the prefix para – presso, alongside. A human type, how well the ancient culture classified and that, in concert with Vico, we can define a very true type.
Ora, the great heart of Tarquinius, full of do-goodism and philanthropy, shaken by a lively and agitated desire for a welcome regardless, not only does it deny and reject the dictionary and history and, in the present news contingency, the Minister of the Interior the Hon. Matteo Salvini - the one who ordered the eviction of the camp - but cancels the authority of:

Read More

Share

The enemies of Christian civilization

A masterful article by someone who is not Catholic, but it comes with the observation of reality, reason and culture, to describe the truth. (n.d.r.)

Of Marcello Veneziani
Christian civilization today has three enemies: the Islamic invasion, atheistic materialism and Bergoglio's church. In different ways and degrees they are uprooting the seed of Christianity from our lives, the link with its symbols, with his wedding ring and his tradition. They detest any attempt to give visibility and centrality to the Christian message, they can't stand the crucified in public places, they are indignant if someone raises the problem of safeguarding their living space, its cities, its rites and liturgies.
The former want to replace a religion that they feel is declining with theirs and submit Christianity to Islam. The second wants to erase every trace of spirituality and of religious presence from the public horizon for reduce man to his desires and his selfishness. The third wants to reduce Christian civilization to a place of welcome, humanitarian corridor, to the point of losing every living trace of Christianity. The first comes from below, from the south of the world, from boats and NGOs. The second comes down from above, from the great factories of atheism and nihilism that nest in the media, in the consumer society, in the sanctuaries of finance and ideology. Read More

Share
1 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 20