ALLOY BODIES Antipredazione | Science and Bioethics

Interview with Dr. Paul Byrne sulla "morte cerebrale"
by

Image results for DR. PAUL BYRNEReport National Anti-Organ Predation League

www.antipredazione.org
22/06/2018 Press release no. 11

INTERVIEW WITH DR. PAUL BYRNE ON “BRAIN DEATH”

Decreed to avoid the explanters from going to prison for murder

In this interview Dr. Paul Byrne, greatest voice in the international debate, with exceptional clarity it unmasks concepts and words of the institutional health-legal system which has imposed the dogma of the so-called "brain death" declared on the living who have lost consciousness. This simulation equated pseudo brain death with a beating heart to true death in prolonged cardio-circulatory and respiratory arrest., to develop the business practice of explants-transplants of vital organs as well as the authoritarian elimination of patients suffering from serious brain lesions, as in the case of little Alfie, so as to avoid the explanters going to prison for murder.
***

“VISITAI ALFIE: THE PROBLEM E’ BRAIN DEATH” Read More

Share
Actuality | Science and Bioethics

«Visitai Alfie: the problem is “brain death”»
by

Report Roman correspondence

(Benedetta Frigerio, The New Daily Compass – 3 June 2018) Where did the medical approach clearly revealed to the world by little Alfie Evans come from?? The answer for Dr. Paul Byrne, internationally renowned neonatologist, that in December of 2017 called by the child's family he flew to Liverpool to visit him, has been clear for years: «Everything starts from the definition of death, no longer clinical but cerebral, sanctioned in 1968 by a Harvard medical commission".
Doctor Byrne, explain to us why you differentiate real death from brain death and what implications this distinction has?
I started an intensive care unit for sick children in 1963 at the Cardinal Glendon Hospital for Childrend in St. Louis, I was deeply motivated by the intention to sustain life in every way possible. During this period, New therapies have been discovered. But a few years later a new definition of death began to spread: the patient was no longer considered dead until the cessation of cardiac and circulatory functions, therefore also respiratory and nervous system, but it was enough to detect the absence of activity of the brain to declare him dead. In the 1975 A premature baby was admitted to my ward, Joseph. He was ventilated and then declared brain dead because his electroencephalogram showed no signs of activity. But Joseph was alive, so I continued to treat him: today he is the father of three children. From that moment I began to question the definition of brain death, finding out it was a lie. Read More

Share
ALLOY BODIES Antipredazione | Science and Bioethics

ALFIE EVANS SHOULD HAVE DIED: SHAME!
by

Report National Anti-Organ Predation League

Alfie died at Alder Hey Hospital in Liverpool on 28 April after extubation (removal of support ventilation) performed on 23 April by order of the British Court (and European Court collusion) who imposed kidnapping and death on the little boy "for his best interest", in absolute contempt of the wishes of his parents who wanted to care for him elsewhere.

After extubation Alfie defied doctors' expectations, starting to breathe on his own. He continued to breathe on his own for 5 days. They were practiced on him 4 injections with drugs shortly before his death.
No one can say whether Alfie would have had a better chance of treatment in another hospital, as the parents claimed with determination and Herculean effort, or how long he would live; he certainly would not have died like that due to the stubborn choice of the medical and legal authorities who considered this death acceptable. Read More

Share
Non-fiction | Science and Bioethics

Alfie's death and our conscience
by

AN OPINION
Of David Nieri
Alfie's death and our conscience
Source: Franco Cardini
In the end he didn't make it, poor Alfie. He passed away on Saturday night 28 April, a few days before his second birthday. Personally, I hoped for it until the end. I hoped the little one would continue to breathe, therefore to live, after the life support “plug” had been pulled a few days earlier. I hoped that at least the European Court would rule in favor of the transfer to "Bambino Gesù", after the Italian government had granted Alfie Italian citizenship to allow him to expatriate. Finally, I hoped for a miracle – we Catholics, you know, we believe - that it would annihilate judges and scientists from across the Channel who intend to rule on "life worth living" by establishing the boundary as a question of right, perhaps even going against the wishes of the parents - for a child under two years old, the only one possible. But in the land of Albion – that of the god of the English in whom you should never believe, and in fact I don't believe it – that's how it works: if there is no agreement between doctors and family, the law provides for the intervention of a judge. In the case in question, the doctors at Alder Hey Children's Hospital in Liverpool had already declared, last December, that they have exhausted all options available to save the little one, therefore deciding to suspend the artificial ventilation that was keeping him alive. Decision to which obviously Tom and Kate Evans, the two very young parents, they were opposed, indicating among the treatment possibilities also the transfer to the "Bambino Gesù". None of this happened. As in the sad case of Charlie Gard, the end of a child's life has been decreed by law, and repeated appeals - including from the Holy See - to try to save the child were of no avail. Read More

Share
Actuality | Science and Bioethics

ALFIE, HIS DAD AND HIS MOM
by

Alfie, his dad and his mom silvana de mari communityOf Silvana De Mari
Alfie's father and mother will not be allowed to take the baby away.
Every parent must be able to be sure that everything has been done, every parent must see their child die only after every avenue has been tried. These two parents will not be allowed.
The little one runs the risk of dying if he leaves the hospital, so it's better for him to die in hospital without risk.
The power described by Kafka was a fledgling amateur compared to this logic. The day after the blitz attempted by his father Alfie, very sick English child, he had no right to his mother's presence for a day. This is his best interest?
The mother is a British citizen, and she has a clean criminal record, she is not a terrorist and is not suspected of having a terrorist act among her plans. Alfie's mum is not a serial killer.
Yet a state separates a mother from her sick child. Read More

Share