Actuality | Non-fiction

How beautiful, the enemy has returned
by

Of Claudio Risé
How beautiful, the enemy has returned
Source: Claudio Risé
Breathe fresh air. The words prove it: those repeated to the point of exhaustion decay and to the general amazement old ones return. Drier, irritating, but perhaps even truer. For example, the word enemy is back in vogue, said so, without much fuss. As Donald Trump did from Helsinki, before the meeting with Vladimir Putin, when in an interview with American television CBS he said: “I think the European Union is an enemy. You wouldn't believe it, but Europeans are enemies”. The statement is not presented as a personal matter, even if the large inflated puppet with a Trump-infant with diaper and cell phone in hand, hoisted into the sky for 16 thousand pounds in front of the Parliament in London with the blessing of the mayor Sadiq Khan will certainly have had his part in the matter, as well as the anti-Donald marches in the streets of Helsinki from where the President gave the interview. But Trump reassures: enemies exist, it's not a scandal, nor anything new. On the contrary: “It doesn't mean they're bad.", continued the US president. “It means they are competing with us”. Here again is the child with his scandalous cry that is changing the world: the King is naked.
We are not all friends. But let's not make it a tragedy. It was the story they told us before that was a farce. The displeased European establishment then immediately intervenes with heartfelt denials and firm condemnations, as per the script: the President of the EU Council, Donald Tusk assures us that no! “The US and the EU are excellent friends! Anyone who says they are enemies spreads fake news”, brandishing the most used and worn cliché of the moment to try to fix everything. In reality the fake news, lasted far too long, it's the one that: “we are all friends”. The absolute novelty is the great return of the linguistic category, affective and cognitive of the friend-enemy, which has always presided over human life, to relationships between people, and of course also between states. Well yes: It's true that we don't always love each other; but there's nothing wrong with that and there's no need to make a big deal out of it. Generally, as Puer Robustus says Donald Trump is simply because “we are competing”: better to admit it, rather than cheating the cards. Read More

Share
Actuality | CLEAN HANDS

Bergoglio, Soros and Bonino for the New World Order
by

Image results for Bergoglio and SorosLet's consider that Danilo Quinto is not a sedevacantist, but it poses serious questions on the problem of Authority in the Church and makes analyzes and observations that are widely shared.
Written and reported by Danilo Quinto

On #migrants, Bergoglio says the same things as Emma Bonino, of George Soros and the entire left condemned by history and anti-Christ. He doesn't want to be pope, defend and pass on the faith. He wants to be a politician.

Inserting itself into the debate of recent days on the Acquarius ship and on the impeccable position taken by the Italian Government and in particular by the Minister of the Interior Matteo Salvini, Bergoglio claims that “migrants can enrich our society”. Read More

Share
Policy | Non-fiction

The left reduced to the sole thought of the elites
by

Of Carlo Freccero
The left reduced to the sole thought of the elites
THE SELF-CRITICISM OF A CERTAIN LEFT (N.D.R.)
Source: The Manifesto
The left is in crisis today and is wondering how it could speak to the new populisms to lead them back to the tracks of an elitist democracy that resembles an oligarchy more than a democracy in the strict sense.
Vice versa, even when he says he wants to listen to the malaise of which populism is an expression, the left entrenches itself in the clichés of political correctness. While, In my opinion, an objective self-analysis would be enough to understand things from another angle. The question is what the left is today and what the left once was? Because there has been such a radical change? I already know the answer. We were wrong. What if we are wrong now?
In any case, reflect on what the left was at its origins, already contains the answer to the problem of populism today.
Before, right-wing populism didn't exist because many of the instances of today's populism were on the left. And the growth of people's rights was not considered reactionary, but progressive.
The great fracture on the left begins with the so-called third way and the complete surrender of progressives to neoliberalism. Since then we have been immersed in the single thought to the point of having lost the memory of ourselves. Read More

Share
Actuality | Policy

“If people knew what the spread was, violence would break out in the streets"
by

Of Robert Dejan
A Great Nando Ioppolo “What is it spread... I think that if people knew, war would break out in the streets from today to tomorrow “ SPREAD, THE DEATH TRAP In a recent interview Professor Nando Ioppolo (lawyer and economist, recently passed away), claims that SPREAD is something if people knew what it was, violence would most likely break out in the streets because a shameful media campaign based on lies was launched on SPREAD.

Ioppolo explains that the game starts from the ECB ( European Central Bank) which lends to private banks 0,75% all the euros they ask for for whatever reason they ask for them. Then the bank (UNICREDIT in the Professor's example), with this 0,75 he buys us the BTPs which technically should be allo 0,76. Why then al 5 %? Because this way the Bank can speculate on it. Read More

Share