Sovereignists at the crossroads between "light" Europe and the Trump option

of the Prof. Paolo Becchi on Libero, 20/07/2018
Juncker's image, President of the European Commission, visibly altered and staggering during the last NATO summit, it represents what Europe currently is better than anything else. The Franco-German axis, of which Juncker is the expression, he's in a coma, non-ethyl, but still in a coma.
The Visegrad Group of countries interacts with the United States,and the United States has openly declared support for Brexit, war on the EU and support for all those countries like ours that have taken on a Eurosceptic orientation with the new government. Let's say it clearly: Trump's policy is not at all "isolationist", as it seemed from the election campaign. American foreign policy is completely back under neocon control. Trump now clearly aims to disaggregate Europe, because it fears not only the economic but also the political growth of Germany. Perhaps it is no coincidence that Bannon is in Italy so often in recent months, on Trump's "exploratory mandate" or in his own interest, it doesn't matter. Trump is revealing the true face of his current administration: to all intents and purposes it continues to exercise that imperial role that the United States has had since the post-war period and which after the fall of the Berlin Wall, for a few years, they practiced on their own. Right, now there is Putin's Russia again, and also China, that move on the international stage, but Europe?
Ecco, Trump's strategy is evident: aim for the disintegration of Europe by helping all those populist movements, sovereignists who are succeeding in Europe. Here a big problem arises for Europe and for our country in Europe. Italy is faced with two possible paths: deal a heavy blow to the now weakened Franco-German hegemony, taking advantage of Trump's support, but in this case running the risk of becoming the "Atlantic bridgehead" on the old continent. Free from European constraints, but subjects once again of the American Empire? Read More

Share

In the vortex of self-destruction of the West-World

Incapable of leadership, always politically late.

Of Maurizio Blondet
“Russia must be at the G7, like it or not, we must have Russia at the negotiating table”, Trump vibrates in a certainly not improvised exit, and the anti-government TV lounges discover that Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte, the one they portrayed as a foolish king, a leader of an unrealistic populist alliance, unprepared and stupid, can say at his first summit in Canada, not at all intimidated: “I agree with President Donald Trump, Russia should return to the G8. In everyone's interest".
It's not like there's any alliance here. What we are witnessing is the disintegration of the Western order, which involves unexpected recompositions, perhaps temporary. The English thinking powerhouses, in the turmoil of a Brexit that Merkel-Juncker want to be increasingly hostile and punitive, he took the opportunity to support the well-founded Italian discontent, explaining in various articles how Germany is the only one that has gained from the euro, and the one that has the most to lose by making the EU "an enemy rather than an ally" of Italy. And in other articles, they explained the Deutsche Bank crisis in depth. And an article from the Financial Times has quite a bit of power in the world of international finance. Read More

Share

The climate has changed, thanks to the Italian vote


Of Maurizio Blondet
“The EU must understand that populism is the symptom of real political failure”
“It's Europe's lack of reform, not Italy, that will break up the eurozone”.
These are not two headlines from Slovenian sovereignist newspapers. The first, is leading an analysis of the powerful – and globalist-imperialist Royal Institute of International Affairs, the legendary "Chatham House”. The second, it is a title of the Financial Times, the theological guarantor of dogmatic liberalism, and is signed by one of its great signatures, Wolfgang Munchau, who among other things is a "Europeanist", having fought against Brexit.
How the climate has changed. The Italian vote has opened the floodgates to critical analyzes of the German-led European Union, never before expressed explicitly
Chataham House warns the oligarchies of Brussels and Berlin against the contemptuous interpretation they are giving of the Italian political situation: a comfortable read, self-acquittal, which - being wrong - can only lead to serious consequences. “The term populism is adopted not as a signal of necessary political reforms in Europe, but as a convenient excuse to dismiss society's demands as incompatible with liberal democracy.". Read More

Share

L'Italia: un futuro come "media potenza"

Of Antonio Terrenzio
Italy: un futuro come "media potenza"
Source: Conflicts and strategies
In the previous article, we had mentioned the need for a resumption of Italy's strategic role in the Mediterranean and greater weight in the "Euro/Atlantic" area.
The European Union, the Middle East and North Africa, they are the main poles where our foreign policy must return to having an assertive role.
The EU in particular, is experiencing a historical period of extreme weakness: the exponential growth of Eurosceptic parties due to senseless migration policies, the economic and bureaucratic rigidity of its institutions, they have significantly weakened its structure. Brexit was the first important consequence of the crisis of the European system.
Italy, as a founding country of the EU and always present at international tables, G7 and United Nations, it has progressively lost strategic and economic weight, as US unipolarity gradually extended its hegemony across the globe. Read More

Share

The hypocrisy of chemical weapons

Of Robert Fish
The hypocrisy of chemical weapons
Source: Comedonchisciotte
The hypocrisy of it all. These ignoble intentions. The carelessness. The shameful lies and excuses.
I'm not talking about the US president with hasty and impulsive tweets and his desires to escape police raids on his lawyer's office - obviously there is a connection with Russia.
And I'm not talking about his latest scandal. It's possible that life with Melania isn't going swimmingly at the moment. Better to talk about this than to sit with generals and ex-generals and seriously discuss Russia and Syria.
I'm not talking about Theresa May, who wants to avoid the Brexit discussion through every type of distraction possible: the Salisbury attacks, Douma -also Trump. So when the poor lady thought she had gotten the consent of the US President, Trump called Macron. What is all this nonsense? Read More

Share