AGAINST THE TRADITION OF THE CHURCH, AGAINST THE DOCTORS OF THE CHURCH, AGAINST THE CORRECT INTERPRETATION OF THE COMMANDMENT “DO NOT KILL”, AGAINST S. TOMMASO D’AQUINO, BERGOGLIO INVENTS ANOTHER AMENITIES’ FOR HIS CHURCH, MORE AND MORE’ FAR FROM THE RIGHTS OF GOD AND EVER MORE’ CLOSE TO AN ABSURD ANTHROPOCENTRISM WITH A LIBERAL-MASONIC FLAVOR (N.D.R.)
Per traditionalist part, now reduced to those (clergy and lay people) who do not recognize the “conciliar hierarchy” as legitimate, there is a certain reluctance to the loud objection of Bergoglio, compared to its predecessors, because it might seem that the crisis and problems arise with him, almost getting the result of “absolve” everyone else, as a consequence.
I believe that it is not wrong to consider it limited to attack only the Argentine chemical expert for his bizarre or heretical expressions, because whoever wants (and must) having an overall vision must begin the overview of what happened at an ecclesial level and therefore, harshly criticize documents and people, at least since the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965). Announced by Roncalli, continued and finished by Montini, this meeting laid the foundations for a genetic mutation, on the human level, of the official Church. Not being able to, but, It transforms but is handed down, as the Mystical Body of Christ is only in continuity with Its Founder, we are forced to believe that the Vatican 2 was not a Council of the Roman Catholic Apostolic Church, as much as a Council of the “Counter-Church”, composed of fallen clerics, infiltrated by liberal and social-communist ideology, theologically modernists (“modernism is the synthesis of all heresies” – Saint Pius X). Prepared for some time in the lodges, found fertile ground in Roncalli, While His Holiness Pius XII he refused to call it, since he had grasped the seditious will of the so-called innovators. All of Pope Pacelli's predecessors had, moreover, energetically rejected the embrace of modernity, understood as the adaptation to sins against God and against others, always condemned, but passed off as mercy and charity (sic!). Read More
Let's consider that Danilo Quinto is not a sedevacantist, but it poses serious questions on the problem of Authority in the Church and makes analyzes and observations that are widely shared.
Written and reported by Danilo Quinto
On #migrants, Bergoglio says the same things as Emma Bonino, of George Soros and the entire left condemned by history and anti-Christ. He doesn't want to be pope, defend and pass on the faith. He wants to be a politician.
Inserting itself into the debate of recent days on the Acquarius ship and on the impeccable position taken by the Italian Government and in particular by the Minister of the Interior Matteo Salvini, Bergoglio claims that “migrants can enrich our society”. Read More
Beyond legitimate theological disquisitions, facts matter. From today the Vatican occupied by the conciliars is an official satellite of the supranational powers in all respects. It can't be the Catholic Church! (n.d.r.) by Roberto PECCHIOLI
New air in the Holy See. In the same days of June, two events feature the two thousand year old Church founded by Jesus Christ ( not the Catholic Church, but the Church occupied by the modernists! n.d.r.). No spirituality, much less care for souls. While Bergoglio receives the leaders of the Seven Sisters in the Vatican, fossil energy giants like Exxon, Royal Dutch, the Rockefeller family, all gentlemen of very uncertain devotion but very certain power, his most important collaborator, Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin is admitted to the annual meeting of the Bilderberg Club.
The merry band meets behind closed doors and in the usual ostentatious privacy 66 years. This year the honor of hosting the event falls to Turin, the city of Lambs. The members of the circle are the most conspicuous representatives of the oligarchies in power: bankers, financiers, shareholders and top executives of multinationals, their political butlers and journalism clerics embedded. The topics covered, as always, they are the political agenda, economical, cultural to impose on much of the world. After decades, the invitation of this exclusive lodge, anything but versed in religious affairs, it extended to the Vatican foreign minister. Read More
Of Maurizio Blondet
Sudden interest from globalist power plants in Italy. In the same days in which the Bilderberg group gathers in Turin, in Rome, Bergoglio (The Pope) chairs a summit, which he summoned, with the Seven Sisters – to be precise, with the supreme leaders of the multinational oil companies – and their transnational financial auxiliaries. The meeting will take place on 7-10 June. Information on this enigmatic Pope-Petroleum summit is about as scarce as that on Bilderberg. The meeting is in fact defined "private”, that is, secret and by invitation.
Why El Papa “from the suburbs”, of the "welcome" of immigrants, who preaches a Church that takes "the smell of sheep", meets in private with the most powerful capitalists, globalist billionaires, i.e. active promoters of the ferocious iniquities of terminal capitalism? “Ask them”, one feels like saying, paraphrasing the slogan of 8 per Mille.
The excuse for the meeting, to read unofficial press releases, it is the common concern of the oil billionaires and El Papa for climate change. “It is one of the most highly significant developments”, shakes up the statement, “demonstrating how large corporations work with other world leaders on climate change, coinciding with President Trump's complete withdrawal from the topic of global warming".
“A year ago Trump announced his intention to withdraw America from the Paris climate pact, which today is supported by all countries except the USA. Three years ago, Pope Francis wrote his encyclical Lbold Yeson the importance of tackling climate change: a first time in the history of the Church".
It can be said well: Bergoglio's new church has replaced anxiety for the eternal salvation of souls with an anxious thirst for the salvation of the planet - threatened, as everyone knows, from that polluter that is the human race. In this, with perfect coherence, in January last year, the Vatican called to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, as speaker at the conference “Saving the natural world”, that is, to instruct Christians on their new urgent moral tasks, the entomologist Paul Ehrlich, famous promoter of selective abortion and mass sterilization to defuse what he called "the Population Bomb", the demographic bomb.
The climate, the planet to be saved in its wild areas , beasts and forests, it's an urgent concern for the intelligent left, Obviously, for the rich "progressives". And therefore also of Francesco.
The press release gives an initial list of participants, warning that it is incomplete. They will be there:
Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, “the invisible rock that rules the world”, the violin is an article from the Corriere, i.e. the largest investment fund on the planet, “ with assets under management of 6.3 trillion dollars, the GDP of France and Spain combined, almost three times our public debt. Black Rock owes its fortune to asset management: pension funds, banks, States”. And the “first foreign investor in Europe (and in Italy), major shareholder in banks such as Deutsche Bank, Intesa San Paolo, Bnp, Ing, significant shareholder also in the energy sectors, chemistry, transport, agri-food, aeronautics, real estate".
The mega-fund has set its sights on the business represented by Europe's pension systems which are still not sufficiently privatized: “It pushes the EU Commission to launch a private pension plan, then manages the first pilot project”, Il Fatto wrote (BlackRock is attacking European pensions) https://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/premium/articoli/blackrock-va-allassalto-delle-pensioni-europee/ (that's what the EU Commission is for).
THE NEW CONCILIAR ECUMENIST CHURCH – NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH THE CATHOLIC CHURCH (LITTLE FLOCK REMAINING FAITHFUL TO CHRIST, TO TRADITION, TO THE CHURCH)
Incredible, the cardinal elect (IN THE NEW CONCILIAR ECUMENIST CHURCH, N.D.R.) Pedro Barreto, designated by the pope (POPE OF THE CONCILIAR ECUMENIST CHURCH, N.D.R.) and archbishop of the Diocese of Huancayo (ALWAYS FROM THE ECUMENIST CONCILIAR CHURCH, N.D.R.), he publicly declared himself in favor of the ideology gender in schools, in open contrast with the rest of the Peruvian Church, opposed the scandalous operation as a whole with massive demonstrations and the faithful also took to the streets in protest. The new cardinal (OF THE ECUMENIST CONCILIAR CHURCH, N.D.R.) Barreto, whose positions immediately met with the approval of the United Nations, he accused those who are against it of being at the service of «lobby interests». Read More
blob:https://gloria.tv/20d0dda3-e390-41f2-b00a-af0868db114e In truth it is the “Our Age” of the Second Vatican Council which lays the doctrinal foundations to equalize the one Way, Truth and Life (Jesus Christ) with the error (heresies, other religions, other philosophies, nihilistic ideologies etc.). This equalization has edified, over the years, the new ecumenist Church, conciliar cosmopolitan, which is not Catholic because it contradicts the Trinitarian Dogma, precisely by putting him on the same level as Allah, Yahweh, Luther and company. So Bergoglio is only the latest (for now) of the apostates occupying the Throne of St. Peter, the dioceses and parishes. Before him, we get to Roncalli. THE PASSION OF PERPETUA AND HAPPINESS
Bergoglio should be deeply ashamed when reading the few lines that follow: these two young women could have very easily saved themselves for what the judge considered a mere formality: incense idols. Instead Bergoglio incenses and honors idols exclusively for his own vainglory! Read More
Pope Leo XIII in I have learned enough he states: Jesus Christ established in the Church a "vivo, authentic and perennial teaching”, which he himself strengthened with his power, he informed of the spirit of truth and authenticated with miracles; and he wanted and commanded that the precepts of his doctrine should be received as his own. Therefore every time this magisterium declares that this or that dogma is contained in the body of divinely revealed doctrine, everyone must take it as true, so long as, if it could be fake, it would follow that God himself would be the author of man's error, which is repugnant: “O Lord, if there is an error, we were deceived by you” [Richard of St. Victor, By Trin., lib. I, cap. 2]. So, every reason to doubt has been removed, who will ever be allowed to repudiate even one of these truths, without his falling into heresy and without that, being separated from the Church, rejects all Christian doctrine on the whole? Indeed, such is the nature of faith that nothing is so repugnant to it as admitting one dogma and repudiating another. In fact, the Church openly declares that faith is a "supernatural virtue, with which, inspired and helped by the grace of God, we believe that the things he revealed are true, not for the intrinsic truth of the same known with the natural light of reason, but by the authority of the revealing God himself, who cannot deceive or be deceived” [Conc. Vat., sess. III, cap. 3]. Therefore, if a truth is known to have been revealed by God, and yet it is not believed, it follows that nothing at all is believed by divine faith. In fact, what James the Apostle sentences regarding the crime in matters of morals, must assert itself about an erroneous opinion on matters of faith: “Anyone will have missed only one point, he was guilty of all”. On the contrary, with greater reason it must be said of this than of that. Indeed, less properly the whole law is said to have been violated by one who transgressed it in one thing alone, not being able to see themselves in him, if not by interpreting its will, a contempt for the majesty of God the legislator. Instead he who, even in just one point, disagrees with revealed truths, he has completely lost his faith, as it refuses to venerate God as the supreme truth and proper reason for faith; therefore Augustine says: “In many things they agree with me, in some few no; but for those few things in which they do not agree with me, The many things in which they agree with me are of no use to them”[S. Augustine, In Psal. LIV, n. 19]. And with reason; because those who take from the Christian doctrine what they like, they are based not on faith, but on one's own judgement: and not "bringing all one's intellect back to obedience to Christ”(1Cor 10,5), they obey themselves more properly than God. “Oh, said Augustine, that you believe what you want in the Gospel, and don't believe what you don't want, believe yourselves rather than the Gospel” [S. Augustine, lib. XVII, Against Faustus the Manichean, cap. 3]. End of quote.