Bergoglio, the conciliars and the shame of tradition
Of Matthew Castagna
Per traditionalist part, now reduced to those (clergy and lay people) who do not recognize the “conciliar hierarchy” as legitimate, there is a certain reluctance to the loud objection of Bergoglio, compared to its predecessors, because it might seem that the crisis and problems arise with him, almost getting the result of “absolve” everyone else, as a consequence.
I believe that it is not wrong to consider it limited to attack only the Argentine chemical expert for his bizarre or heretical expressions, because whoever wants (and must) having an overall vision must begin the overview of what happened at an ecclesial level and therefore, harshly criticize documents and people, at least since the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965). Announced by Roncalli, continued and finished by Montini, this meeting laid the foundations for a genetic mutation, on the human level, of the official Church. Not being able to, but, It transforms but is handed down, as the Mystical Body of Christ is only in continuity with Its Founder, we are forced to believe that the Vatican 2 was not a Council of the Roman Catholic Apostolic Church, as much as a Council of the “Counter-Church”, composed of fallen clerics, infiltrated by liberal and social-communist ideology, theologically modernists (“modernism is the synthesis of all heresies” – Saint Pius X). Prepared for some time in the lodges, found fertile ground in Roncalli, While His Holiness Pius XII he refused to call it, since he had grasped the seditious will of the so-called innovators. All of Pope Pacelli's predecessors had, moreover, energetically rejected the embrace of modernity, understood as the adaptation to sins against God and against others, always condemned, but passed off as mercy and charity (sic!). Read More
