Problems in the Spanish enclave: Gaddafi's prophecy is coming true?

Related imageReporting of R.G.

Thursday more than 500 African migrants have crossed the separation barriers of the Spanish enclave of Ceuta and entered illegally into the EU. Already in 2011 when it seemed that nothing foreshadowed such a serious crisis, Libyan leader Gaddafi almost predicted something similar before his assassination.
This is echoed in the pages of newspapers around the world: early in the morning the Spanish and Moroccan civil guards attempted to prevent hundreds of aggressive migrants from crossing the border between Morocco and the EU. During what appears to be a premeditated attack, the police were attacked with flamethrowers, excrement and corrosive substances.
The police were at a loss because, although attacks had also occurred in Ceuta in the past, migrants had never had such violent reactions. In the area surrounding the Spanish enclave, tens of thousands of poor Africans are still waiting for their chance to enter Europe.

Although the number of new asylum requests to the EU has decreased this year, the migration crisis currently seems to have reached its highest point. Hundreds of migrants have shown that they are determined to enter the EU and no one will be able to stop them. Driven by desperation and hunger they are ready to risk their own lives and the lives of border agents to enter Europe. They don't accept “no”.
The violence they employ against the police is shocking and must be a warning sign for Brussels. So far the EU has not responded to this incident, ma, if a concrete action plan is not developed soon, there is the risk that violence and anarchy will also reach the heart of Europe.
Even before the start of the civil war of 2011 the Libyan dictator Gaddafi warned so:

“Listen to me carefully. If you want to suffocate and destabilize me, you will only play Bin Laden's game and help the armed groups of insurgents. The following will happen. You will be attacked by a wave of migration coming from Africa which will pour into Europe from Libya. There will be no one left here to stop them”.

At the time, Gaddafi probably never imagined that he was alone 6 months later he would be killed by rioters in the street after NATO's intervention. But with his warning Gaddafi was right although this does not intend to justify in any way the actions of the Libyan despot. Until 2011 Libya was the richest African country and the desired destination for the starving Eritrean and Nigerian populations.
As for the population, Libya was among the countries with the most immigrants in the world. Today Libya is a failed state in which there is a dual government but there is no order. The failure of this state has also destabilized neighboring countries. Difficult situations are observed practically from Nigeria to Somalia. During the civil war France and the USA actively supplied the Libyan rebels with weapons who naturally did not return them after the end of the war. Military equipment from Gaddafi's arsenals was looted. Thus Libya was formed into a real one “arms market”. The Humans Rights Watch organization thus warned after the end of the civil war: “It's the largest distribution of weapons we've ever seen. It will be a threat to the region in the coming decades”. A similar development could also be observed following the American interventions in Iraq, Afghanistan e, before the Russian intervention, also in Syria.

Today the majority of asylum applications in Germany are submitted by refugees from the above countries. Mostly Nigerians leave Africa for Europe, Eritrea, Somalia e Chad. More than 75% of refugees arriving in Europe by sea leave from Libyan ports.

The politics of the German Chancellor of “somehow we will make it” recalls the impotence of the Roman Empire shortly before its fall. The Romans failed to manage the migration crisis when the Goths were at the gates and entered the Empire during the attack of the Huns. Initially the Goths were welcomed peacefully, food was provided to them, but when flow became too important, the Romans started a war to stop the Goths.

Furthermore, the corrupt Roman authorities kept food for them and, when the Goths who lived in Rome realized this unfair treatment towards them, an insurrection broke out. The famous historian Alexander Demandr also listed other causes of the fall of the Roman Empire: “Decadence, greed, old-fashioned way of thinking, immobility and loss of national identity”. And today in Europe it seems that many citizens of the Union believe that everything is fine as long as they have a roof over their heads, they can go out to eat and take holidays. The fall of the Roman Empire began before the migration crisis, so the parallels are chilling. And the legendary quote from Cicero: “How long will our patience last??” proves more relevant than ever if addressed to German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Interior Minister Horst Seehofer.

Merkel's security policy towards migrants differs from her predecessor's policy, l’ex cancelliere Willy Brandt: “In our company they work approximately 2,5 millions of people representing other nations. We have reached the point of having to carefully evaluate where the ultimate limit lies beyond which we can no longer welcome other people and our social responsibility ends”.

Helmut Schmidt ten years later he warned:”More than 4 millions of foreigners are the maximum number for German society if we don't want to have serious problems. We will not be able to integrate more than 4,5 millions of foreigners without any negative consequences”. Today they live in Germany 10,6 millions of foreigners and there has been no talk of secure borders for some time. Horst Seehofer attempted together with Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz and the countries of the Visengrad group to present an alternative program for resolving the migration crisis. “Illegal immigrants must be expelled, border defense must be strengthened. In third countries, collection centers must be built for migrants whose asylum applications have been refused and the Frontex agency must be converted into a border police force”.

The main point of this program is the possibility of applying for asylum in the country of origin. So, after the Ceuta uprisings the question arises: what these centers should do and how they should be defended? The African population is growing very quickly and by 2050 will double until it reaches 2,5 billion. The flow of refugees driven by hunger, from economic problems, from corruption and a lack of prospects could increase. It is very likely that refugees will not accept the rejection of their asylum application and will leave for Europe anyway.

In Syria there is a glimmer of hope because that is where a large part of the refugees are currently heading “Europeans”. Thanks to Russian support for President Bashar al-Assad, it was possible to largely expel ISIS from Syria and interrupt the civil war. After the visit of the Russian delegation, the Syrian president confirmed that all refugees “safe repatriation will be guaranteed”. Active work is already being done on the repatriation of Syrian refugees from neighboring countries (Türkiye, Lebanon and Jordan) so that they can be an integral part of the country's recovery. It will probably be possible in the future to dialogue with Assad to conclude similar agreements for the repatriation of refugees.

Read More

Share

Save soldier Mohamed

Reporting of Federici Studies Center

This is who the 'untouchable' rebel groups of the Daara enclave are
Most of the rebel militias present in southern Syria in the Daara governorate (1400 square km ed 1 million people), they report to a 'control room' called the "Southern Front" (o Shoutern Front – SF) was established 14 February 2014 by the United States and is also supported by European countries, as well as Saudi Arabia and Jordan. The coalition (which groups approximately 49 militias as well as local operations rooms ), has a main operations room in Amman (which is nothing other than the branch of the 'Military Operations Center' (MOC) of the United States for Syria).
While the membership of the Southern Front is controversial - because even though it falls under the aegis of the Free Syrian Army (FSA) , it has generally dissociated itself from the political opposition, the Syrian National Coalition (SNC) – what is certain is that it is financed by the United States and its allies. Their militias receive help from Jordan while - as we know - the Syrian government is thus prevented in any way from asserting its rights or obviously acting in any way in Jordan.
Shoutern Front uses very powerful and widespread activity in the mainstream media and from many sources (including the non-governmental organization 'Carter Center' founded by former president Jimmy Carter), it is judged as an entity that brings together 'moderately religious' and secular groups . This judgment, however, conflicts with the proven correlation of many of its members with the al Nusra group and with the jihad financed by the Saudis.
The Southern Front operates in the Daara provinces , Kuneitra and Suwaida and a few days ago it was defended by the spokesperson of the American State Department who threatened the Syrian army with serious consequences, in case of continuation of the offensive on Daara and surrounding areas on a grand scale.
As opponents the Southern Front has the Islamic State in the Daara enclave through a faction called "Jaysh Khalid bin al-Waleed" (also for this reason this group is barred from entering Jordan and from any type of help through the channels activated by Amman).
Although many militants come from the same clans and sometimes the same extended families, the Southern Front is opposed by the Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham group. Furthermore, in the Daara area there is also the faction called Jund al-Malahem which was born in 2015 from a break with Jabbat al Nusra , affiliated with al Qaeda. Its leader was an emir of Jabhat al-Nusra in Deraa. Currently the militants of this group no longer receive salaries and their activity is very limited.
Currently both the US and Southern Front believe that the truce agreed in the de-escalation area is open-ended and confers the permanent ability to establish a Western-financed fiefdom removed from the sovereignty of the Syrian government. Indeed, things were different, the de-escalation area was intended to de-escalate tensions and start negotiations in which all parties would find an agreement for reunification , behind specific and fair guarantees.
Instead Southern Front continues to set its sights on Damascus which is located in 100 km from the Daara enclave and its leaders do not hide that the conflict will not end with reconciliation but with the final victory against Assad.
In March 2018 hostilities resumed leading up to the imminent offensive of the Syrian army. Any chance of negotiation was promptly rejected by the Southern Front.
While the Syrian government has been trying to negotiate a possible agreement to ease the situation in the southern part of the country, in response, local militant groups became active by launching a preventive battle against the Syrian army.

Read More

Share