German financial terrorism against Italian sovereignty

Of Luigi Tedeschi
German financial terrorism against Italian sovereignty
Source: Italicum
Germany dominates Europe through financial terrorism, a weapon of mass destruction for states, which entails the abrogation of democracy.
It was all already planned, however, it was an easy prophecy.
Mattarella's veto is perfectly consistent with a practice inaugurated by Napolitano and now consolidated, that of the president's governments. That this practice is in open conflict with the constitution, that governments elected by the people are removed and other "technical" governments appointed by Germany and European diktats are put before national sovereignty is now clear to everyone. A de facto presidentialism imposed by Europe has emerged. But above all, appointing Cottarelli in Conte's place, Mattarella has made a political choice that clearly violates the Italian constitution.
That of the technicians is in fact an eminently political choice that deposes popular sovereignty. That's how he expressed himself Marco Della Luna in the book“Traitors in the government” (Arianna Publishing 2013), in relation to the appointment of the Monti government by Napolitano: “… In the case of the Italian situation, and in general of a complex system like every country is complex, the problems are many (not just cheap, but also sociological, hydrogeological, legislative), they are unclear but controversial in their identification and causes; there is no precise and shared technique (Why, even within technical economic science there are totally divergent schools both in the analysis of the causes and in the recipes, indeed the crux of the choices is between opposing economic models); it's not just about solving problems, but to choose which objectives to pursue, what priorities to set, which social classes to tax, which to deprive of assistance, which development model (or modestly survival) adopt, and perhaps even more whether to defend a certain national independence or not, whether to accept or reject a Euro-financial architecture under German hegemony, how to challenge and change the current structure of the Eurosystem. All these choices are choices purely political, non-technical; e, based on the Italian Constitution and the general principles of representative democracy, just a political government, with a popular mandate, can be legitimately placed to carry out them. Not a technician or a government of technicians. And in fact the Monti government has done so, with the explicit and repeated endorsement of Napolitano, a series of heavily political choices, ideological, classiste, and very little "techniques". The thesis of the government of the technicians is a lie to cover up a clear and fundamental unconstitutionality, cannot be remedied retrospectively by a parliamentary vote, especially since the parliamentarians and the parties were not free and serene, but they were held under various threats, internal and external, from the spread to early termination before the pension accrues". Read More

Share

The construction site of unique thought

Of Marco Della Luna
The construction site of unique thought
Source: Marco Della Luna
One of the most conspicuous phenomena of our time is the gigantic and industrious construction site of globalized single thought - with its clients, architects, guardian priests - which serves to make social behavior predictable and directional in the super-accelerated and conflictual world in which we live.
Global financial capitalism, maneuvering the cultural industry (including entertainment), which it largely possesses, he created an orthodoxy, an obligatory thought, mainstream, scientifically correct, how delegitimizing, isolates or criminalizes – that is, practically excommunicates, it expels from conformed society - not only thinking divergent from orthodoxy, but the same free scientific investigation, economic and historiographical, regarding some fundamental things to direct the course of the transformation of society according to his plans. These things are: certain historical events, certain aspects of the economy, European integration, the euro, immigration, l’islam, ethnic diversity, sexual identity; e, lastly, the alleged efficacy and harmlessness of mandatory vaccines.
Protected beliefs have been built on these things, protected beliefs, in the sense that dissent with respect to orthodoxy, and the same free scientific and historical investigation of those beliefs, they are sanctioned with moral delegitimization, career boycott, administrative discrimination, the exclusion of the media, from teaching, from publishing, when not even criminal consequences. Facts that conflict with orthodoxy are withheld from public opinion, especially in key fields for the orientation of collective thought and sensitivity, of the general conception of reality, of political consensus, of legislation and jurisdiction. Read More

Share