Catholics between Europeanism and Populism

And then, Which side are the Catholics on??
by

REVIEW OF THE BOOK BY MATTEO CASTAGNA
Of Mattia Rossi per The newspaper OFF of The newspaper
It caused a sensation, some time ago, the cover of Christian family against the Minister of the Interior Matteo Salvini («Go behind Salvini», it stood out on the cover under the photograph of the Northern League leader). Shortly after, but, the newspaper poll Libero: 85% of Catholics would be in favor of the Minister's policies
And then, which side are they on? (or they have to stay) the Catholics? With what, commonly, is defined as populism or with the pro-European globalism? And southern fascism? Where to position yourself for those who profess to be Catholic? But then, as Catholics? Those of the modernist official hierarchies or those "integral" and faithful to the Catholic Magisterium of all time?
He tries to give the answers Matthew Castagna, journalist and militant Catholic (responsible for the Sedevacantist-oriented “Christus Rex – Traditio” club) in his Catholics between Europeanism and populism. The challenge to nihilism (Solfanelli, pages. 248, euro 17) recently in the bookstore.
Ascertained immediately, from Castagna, that «a “progressive Catholicism” cannot exist» and that «the only possible Catholicism is the “integral” one», There are numerous doctrines that the Veronese journalist reviews (Savonarolism, counter-reformism, the second Francoism, the neo-Lutheranism of Nazism) and then move to the Catholic side in the chapter Integral Catholics, Jesuits, modernist, clerical-fascists.
Catholic integralism, explains Castagna, «perceives in white-Jesuit internationalism, Christian Democrat-Modernist is the political and theological instrument through which the greatest attack is manifesting itself, never conceived, to Christianity". It follows that, according to the author, «the fundamental danger of the Jesuit-modernist union would be represented, per mons. Benign, from the end of the social disintegration of the Western Constantinian and Gregorian Tradition; from absolute and dogmatic anti-fascism; from left-wing Christian Democrats; from fanatical and relativistic technical-pragmatic and politicistic anthropocentrism; from the rejection of the XXIV theses of Thomism; all of this, if achieved with the victory of international anti-fascism, it would have led to neo-modernist nihilism and secularization”. Read More

Share
Catholicism | STUDY CENTER FEDERICI

Mons. Benigni and Saint Gregory VII
by


Reporting of Federici Studies Center

Introduction to the chapter of the Social History of the Church by Msgr. Benigni dedicated to the great pontiff Saint Gregory VII.
Henry IV and Gregory VII (1073-85) up to Canossa (1077).
Hildebrand's election took place on the same day that Alexander II went underground. It was an acclamation of the clergy and the people who wanted him to be the successor of the five popes that Hildebrand had encouraged to reform the Church.. This reform was now irresistibly mature, and as always happens with a profound religious movement, political tendencies penetrated it and led the harsh political and social struggle with them.
Those sectarians of the Errician struggle who brought out the accusation of simony for the election of Gregory VII, they were miserable slanderers. Today there is no wise historian who doubts it. The force of things imposed the choice of those who had powerfully improvised the dominating movement.

Read More

Share
STUDY CENTER FEDERICI

Per un'azione politica e sociale integralmente cattolica
by


Reporting of Federici Studies Center

“Against everything that is opposed to the doctrine, to tradition, to discipline, to the feeling of the Catholicwe are entirely Roman; for everything that complies with it"
The program of Monsignor Umberto Benigni's Sodalitium Pianum
1 We are integral Roman Catholics. As this word indicates, the integral Roman Catholic accepts the doctrine in its entirety, to the discipline, the directions of the Holy See and all their legitimate consequences for the individual and for society. It is "daddy", "clerical", antimodern, anti-liberal, anti-sectarian. He is therefore entirely counter-revolutionary, because he is an opponent not only of the Jacobin Revolution and of sectarian radicalism, but equally of religious and social liberalism. It is absolutely understood that by saying "integral Roman Catholic", it is not at all intended to modify in any way the authentic and glorious title of Roman Catholic. The word "integral" means only "wholly Roman Catholic", that is, fully and simply Roman Catholic without the corresponding additions or restrictions (even outside the intention of those who use it) as much to the expressions of "liberal Catholic", «social Catholic», and any other, as to the fact of those who tend to restrict in theory or in practice the application of the rights of the Church and the duties of the Catholic in religious and social life.

Read More

Share