Actuality | Policy

Identity card, Garante privacy boccia "padre" e "madre". Salvini: «We move forward»
by

Carta identità, Garante privacy boccia Negative opinion of the Privacy Guarantor on the replacement of the indication of “parent 1” e “parent 2” con “padre” e “madre” in the forms for issuing the electronic identity card for minor children. The issue was raised by the Minister of the Interior Matteo Salvini and the Interior Ministry then turned to the Authority to express its opinion on the draft decree intended to reform the forms. With the opinion, dated 31 October and published on the Guarantor's website, the Authority led by Antonello Soro identified several critical issues.
«We move forward, there is no privacy that denies a child the right to have a mother and a father". The minister says so?Internal Matteo Salvini regarding the negative opinion of the Privacy Guarantor on the replacement of the indication of parent 1 and parent 2 with father and mother in the forms for issuing the electronic identity card for minor children.
Continue on: https://www.ilmessaggero.it/politica/carta_identita_padre_madre_salvini_privacy-4109960.html
 

Share
Science and Bioethics

"Christus Rex": freedom of expression or gender dictatorship?
by


THE POINT
Of Giacomo Bergamaschi, of the Club “Christ the King – Tradition” (photo above of the speakers at yesterday's LGBT conference at Villa Buri, VR. All rights reserved.)
A small minority of the population (LGBTTI), whose sexual tendencies are deviant compared to those of the vast majority, she managed to make her own interests transform into the dominant theme of one global cultural revolution. This is all amazing, because the realization of these interests does not contribute to the solution of the existential problems of society as a whole but rather amplifies them, leading to the disintegration of families and a demographic crisis. The new sexual ethics, which poses homosexuality, bisexuality, transsexuality and transgenderism on the same level as heterosexuality, it has now become an integral part of pedagogy in schools of all levels. The United States Supreme Court Decision of 26 June 2015 on same-sex marriage has created a scandal everywhere and many analysts have also seen the rise of Trumpism as a consequence of the reaction of the Pro-Life people towards legal decisions that trample on, in the name of rights, the first right: that of procreation and Life. The Constitutional Judge Samuel Alito This is how he interpreted that sentence of 1915:
“Today's decision usurps the constitutional right of the people to decide whether to maintain or modify the traditional notion of marriage…When a slim majority of judges can invent a new right and impose that right on the entire nation, the only real limit given to future majorities will be their own opinion regarding what those in political and cultural power will be willing to tolerate.". Read More

Share