Catholics between Europeanism and Populism

And then, Which side are the Catholics on??
by

REVIEW OF THE BOOK BY MATTEO CASTAGNA
Of Mattia Rossi per The newspaper OFF of The newspaper
It caused a sensation, some time ago, the cover of Christian family against the Minister of the Interior Matteo Salvini («Go behind Salvini», it stood out on the cover under the photograph of the Northern League leader). Shortly after, but, the newspaper poll Libero: 85% of Catholics would be in favor of the Minister's policies
And then, which side are they on? (or they have to stay) the Catholics? With what, commonly, is defined as populism or with the pro-European globalism? And southern fascism? Where to position yourself for those who profess to be Catholic? But then, as Catholics? Those of the modernist official hierarchies or those "integral" and faithful to the Catholic Magisterium of all time?
He tries to give the answers Matthew Castagna, journalist and militant Catholic (responsible for the Sedevacantist-oriented “Christus Rex – Traditio” club) in his Catholics between Europeanism and populism. The challenge to nihilism (Solfanelli, pages. 248, euro 17) recently in the bookstore.
Ascertained immediately, from Castagna, that «a “progressive Catholicism” cannot exist» and that «the only possible Catholicism is the “integral” one», There are numerous doctrines that the Veronese journalist reviews (Savonarolism, counter-reformism, the second Francoism, the neo-Lutheranism of Nazism) and then move to the Catholic side in the chapter Integral Catholics, Jesuits, modernist, clerical-fascists.
Catholic integralism, explains Castagna, «perceives in white-Jesuit internationalism, Christian Democrat-Modernist is the political and theological instrument through which the greatest attack is manifesting itself, never conceived, to Christianity". It follows that, according to the author, «the fundamental danger of the Jesuit-modernist union would be represented, per mons. Benign, from the end of the social disintegration of the Western Constantinian and Gregorian Tradition; from absolute and dogmatic anti-fascism; from left-wing Christian Democrats; from fanatical and relativistic technical-pragmatic and politicistic anthropocentrism; from the rejection of the XXIV theses of Thomism; all of this, if achieved with the victory of international anti-fascism, it would have led to neo-modernist nihilism and secularization”. Read More

Share
Catholicism | Monsters council

Comparison between the Catholic Church and the false conciliar Church
by

Of Father Maria Romualdo Lafitte
TRUE CATHOLIC CHURCH FALSE CHURCH OF BERGOGLIO
Dal 0 until 1958, Dal 1958 until now Our Lord until Pius XII 6 Antipapi: and “John XXIII” a “Francis I”
 
Image results for Pius XII
Rosario: 15 mystery 20 mystery
Sodomy: Unnatural abomination, 1 of the 4 sins that cry out No more
vengeance before God (Catechism of Saint Pius)
Onanismo, contraception, masturbation : Against nature No more
6o / 9a cdti: fornication (pre-marital reports), adultery: mortal sins No more
Priests celibates, unmarried Now they can Read More

Share
Catholicism | MATTHEW CASTAGNA

Bergoglio, the conciliars and the shame of tradition
by

Of Matthew Castagna

Per traditionalist part, now reduced to those (clergy and lay people) who do not recognize the “conciliar hierarchy” as legitimate, there is a certain reluctance to the loud objection of Bergoglio, compared to its predecessors, because it might seem that the crisis and problems arise with him, almost getting the result of “absolve” everyone else, as a consequence.
I believe that it is not wrong to consider it limited to attack only the Argentine chemical expert for his bizarre or heretical expressions, because whoever wants (and must) having an overall vision must begin the overview of what happened at an ecclesial level and therefore, harshly criticize documents and people, at least since the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965). Announced by Roncalli, continued and finished by Montini, this meeting laid the foundations for a genetic mutation, on the human level, of the official Church. Not being able to, but, It transforms but is handed down, as the Mystical Body of Christ is only in continuity with Its Founder, we are forced to believe that the Vatican 2 was not a Council of the Roman Catholic Apostolic Church, as much as a Council of the “Counter-Church”, composed of fallen clerics, infiltrated by liberal and social-communist ideology, theologically modernists (“modernism is the synthesis of all heresies” – Saint Pius X). Prepared for some time in the lodges, found fertile ground in Roncalli, While His Holiness Pius XII he refused to call it, since he had grasped the seditious will of the so-called innovators. All of Pope Pacelli's predecessors had, moreover, energetically rejected the embrace of modernity, understood as the adaptation to sins against God and against others, always condemned, but passed off as mercy and charity (sic!). Read More

Share
Actuality | Science and Bioethics

«Visitai Alfie: the problem is “brain death”»
by

Report Roman correspondence

(Benedetta Frigerio, The New Daily Compass – 3 June 2018) Where did the medical approach clearly revealed to the world by little Alfie Evans come from?? The answer for Dr. Paul Byrne, internationally renowned neonatologist, that in December of 2017 called by the child's family he flew to Liverpool to visit him, has been clear for years: «Everything starts from the definition of death, no longer clinical but cerebral, sanctioned in 1968 by a Harvard medical commission".
Doctor Byrne, explain to us why you differentiate real death from brain death and what implications this distinction has?
I started an intensive care unit for sick children in 1963 at the Cardinal Glendon Hospital for Childrend in St. Louis, I was deeply motivated by the intention to sustain life in every way possible. During this period, New therapies have been discovered. But a few years later a new definition of death began to spread: the patient was no longer considered dead until the cessation of cardiac and circulatory functions, therefore also respiratory and nervous system, but it was enough to detect the absence of activity of the brain to declare him dead. In the 1975 A premature baby was admitted to my ward, Joseph. He was ventilated and then declared brain dead because his electroencephalogram showed no signs of activity. But Joseph was alive, so I continued to treat him: today he is the father of three children. From that moment I began to question the definition of brain death, finding out it was a lie. Read More

Share