An unprecedented scandal
Il 25 August 2018,
a letter from 11 pages written by “Mons.” Carlo Maria Viganò, former Vatican ambassador to the United States, calls into question the highest levels of the Vatican "hierarchy".. Pedophilia is a system, disguised as "homosexual networks", and Bergoglio, far from fighting against this "octopus", It's part of the conspiracy. Ecco, In summary, what Viganò lets us know with his accusations, before arriving to ask for Francesco's resignation. The scandal is unprecedented in its breadth.
Unpublished, but not entirely unexpected. Since 2017, the grip was tightened around the debauched, to the depraved and criminals who populate the Vatican and the high offices of the conciliar Church. It was George Pell first, “Archbishop” of Sydney, named in 2014 “cardinal-prefect” of the Secretariat for the Economy, to be implicated in sexual assault allegations. This Secretariat was created by Bergoglio; a nice reward for Pell placed in this new place, to the direct slopes of Francesco, a good show of trust given by Bergoglio. In June 2017, the Australian press reveals the investigation he is the subject of. He will be tried in Australia. He was number three in the Vatican. The story will certainly have produced cold sweats for the perverse prelates who crowd the streets of Rome. But this did not prevent the resumption of the rhythm of the orgies. Francis even went so far as to defend a "bishop" who had quelled pedophile scandals in Chile. Il 22 last January, he cynically told reporters: "Oh, with good will, you tell me there are victims, but I haven't seen them, because they didn't show up".
New error. Today, victims have the unfortunate tendency to refuse to remain silent. In Cile, it is a letter from a victim of a pedophile "priest" who accuses Francis: he knew it from 2015. He knew that the “bishop” he was defending, Juan Barros, he had witnessed the sexual assaults of "father" Fernando Karadima several times. Juan Barros had covered for the pedophile "priest"., and Francis covered the "bishop". “I am convinced he is innocent”, said Francesco, if not with his hand on his heart at least with his usual good-natured air. Yet he had known it for three years.
In the 2015, it was the "archbishop" of Boston himself who assured the victim that his testimony had been transmitted to Francis, directly into his hands. The testimony was unequivocal. The victim explained to you that Karadima's sexual touches were common currency in his group, of which he was a kind of guru. Juan Barros, like four other Chilean "bishops"., they came from this community. Barros' guilt is beyond doubt. And that of Francesco?
He would have been the victim of a withholding of information by the “Archbishop” of Boston, Sean O’Malley, In the 2015? The “diocese” of Boston is infamous for organizing the placement of pedophile “priests” from parish to parish, a strategy highlighted by a group of Boston Globe journalists in 2002. This deal even led to the making of a film, Spotlight. Cardinal Bernard Law, who had been its "archbishop" and had therefore allowed several pedophile "priests" to thrive, died peacefully in his bed at the age of 86 years to the end of 2017. As a consolation prize for the loss of the “diocese” of Boston, he had become “archpriest” of the Basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore in Rome.
Not all pastors involved in pedophilia have fared so well. The “father” John Geoghan, of the famous “diocese” of Boston, what he managed to do 130 victims (sexual assaults and rapes of minors), he was less lucky, because he was strangled in his cell by his fellow inmate. Some saw the justice of God in it. Meanwhile, In the 2003, after the Boston Globe revelations. Law left it to his successor, O’Malley, a diocese financially bankrupt due to the millions of dollars to be paid to the victims. It would therefore have been the man who succeeded the infamous Law who did not speak about the Chilean victim's testimony to Francis, if the latter is telling the truth.
But we can believe this impostor?
Gay orgies and hard drugs at the "Sant'Uffizio"
The horror doesn't end here. In April 2018, the gendarmes assigned to the "Holy Office" building, they interrupt a real orgy. The secretary of “Mons.” Coccopalmerio – active supporter of Bergoglio -, Luigi Capozzi, he is arrested in the middle of his homosexual frolics with several companions, under the influence of drugs. He needed his office BMW to transport the white powder duty-free. Cocaine, heroin? We will never know. Hard drugs. The character, “ordered” in 1992, he was about to be "consecrated" bishop, with the blessing of Coccopalmerio. The latter, he was aware of his secretary's somewhat disorderly life? Or he was too busy promoting the “encyclical” Amoris Laetitia, especially the chapter 8 to which he dedicated his work? In his book, the “cardinal” (President emeritus of the «Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts) explains in a learned manner that «the Church could therefore admit to Confession and the Eucharist the faithful who maintain a non-legitimate union, but which fulfill two essential conditions: they want to change the situation but cannot realize their desire[…] This intention is exactly the theological element that allows absolution and access to the Eucharist, Always, we repeat it, that it is impossible to immediately change the situation of sin".
As for homosexuality, his secretary was certainly encouraged by his patron's statements, according to which there are "positive aspects" in homosexual unions («If I meet a homosexual couple, I immediately observe that their relationship is illicit: this is what the doctrine says, which I reiterate with absolute certainty. However, if I stop at the doctrine, I don't look at people anymore. But if I see that the two people really love each other, for example, they do acts of charity towards the needy... then I can also say that, if the relationship remains illicit, Positive elements also emerge in the two people. Instead of closing our eyes to such positive realities, I underline them. It's about being objective and objectively recognizing the positive of a certain relationship, in itself illicit." –
Interview with Rossoporpora, of the 23 October 2014).
Mid-August 2018, the Pennsylvania prosecutor's office has published an investigation that calls into question 300 (three hundred!) «predatory priests» who claimed a thousand minor victims over the course of 70 years. The investigation lasted two years and is contained in a report of almost 900 pages: among other crimes, the Prosecutor discovered sexual abuse committed on children under ten years old. Each time the incident was hidden, but “priests” and bishops” compiled secret archives that were sent to the Vatican. «The Vatican was aware of the abuses and was implicated in their concealment», the report reveals, which had the effect of a bomb.
Bergoglio undoubtedly hoped to emerge from this series of events by still belatedly and subtly playing the card of indignation and humility. He did so by acknowledging his errors in his appreciation of the Chilean situation! He did so by going to Dublin on 25 last August for the IX "World Meeting of Families" to express his "suffering" and his "shame"!
Moreover, in Ireland, cases of pedophilia are not the only scandals that the conciliar sect has had to cover up. While the "priests" abused the boys, the nuns of the «Convento della Maddalena» (Magdalene Sisters) they welcomed single mothers, they sold their children to the Americans and made the girls work as slaves in the laundries where they kept them locked up for years. There is something rotten in the Kingdom of Ireland; and in Pennsylvania and in Boston and in Chile and in Australia and everywhere false shepherds, of disguised criminals, of hardened modernists without faith or law, they were able to abuse the name of Christian with impunity, of the status of consecrated persons, to commit sacrilegious impurities and defile, dirty for life, innocent children and minors.
“We were the land of the Saints… Now I feel that the country is losing faith”, said an Irish Catholic on the eve of Francis' visit. What could he expect from this intruder, this wolf in sheep's clothing?
St. Patrick hunted snakes on the Emerald Isle; Francesco warms them on his chest, and he is one of them, certainly the most poisonous. While he was busy pretending to sympathize with the suffering of the victims, “Mons.” Viganò published his eleven-page letter, completed on the feast of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
This time, Francis cannot escape the obròbio. It's not just those close to him who are caught red-handed, or rather in the pants; it's him, the self-proclaimed “bishop of Rome” who is directly involved.
Corruption reaches the top of the modernist hierarchy
In his letter, Viganò directly accuses Francis of having covered up the sexual abuse of the American "cardinal" Theodore McCarrick, committed for several decades. “Corruption has reached the top of the Church hierarchy”, writes.
What is McCarrick accused of?? The American "prelate" is somewhat of the spiritual son of Luigi Capozzi, the lover of gay orgies, and George Pell, the paedomaniac. The law now prohibits establishing a connection between homosexuality and pedophilia. This means that the combination of these two sexual behaviors is completely fortuitous in McCarrick's person? The fact is that the man is included in all the cases in which a sexual predator can be accused. McCarrick, “archbishop” of Newark, New Jersey, dal 1986 al 2000, he is the happy owner of a house by the sea, where he spent the weekend in the company of several seminarians (sometimes up to five) with whom he shared his bed. With impunity, since the end of the years 1980 al 1996, McCarrick bribed, deviated and defiled with repeated homosexual orgies entire generations of seminarians. Some of these young men were “ordained” for the Diocese of Newark.
Reported to the Holy See in 2000 by the then Nuncio, “Mons.” Montalvo, McCarrick was not the subject of any sanctions from the pseudo-Saint John Paul II. He was even named “archbishop” of Washington in 2000, and created "cardinal" by Wojtyla in 2001.
In the 2006, the new Nuncio, “Mons.” Sambi, sent a testimony from Gregory Littleton to the “Holy See”., a "priest" who said he had been abused by McCarrick... and that he himself was accused of pedophilia. According to Viganò, who had been tasked with drafting the note that Sambi would send, «the facts attributed to McCarrick by Littleton were of such gravity and ugliness as to cause confusion in the reader, disgust and profound pain and bitterness".
These were «solicitation crimes, of urging seminarians and priests to sin against the sixth commandment, repeatedly, even simultaneously and in groups, of mockery of a young seminarian who was trying to resist the archbishop's seductions in the presence of two other priests, of acquittal of the accomplice with whom the impure acts were committed, of sacrilegious celebration of the Eucharist together with other priests after having committed impure acts with them."
These revelations had no effect on Benedict XVI, the pseudo-champion of transparency regarding pedophilia scandals, and this until 2009 or to 2010, when finally "cardinal" McCarrick was moderately and belatedly sanctioned: he could no longer "celebrate Mass in public, participate in public meetings, hold conferences, travel", and had "the obligation to dedicate himself to a life of prayer and penance". Nonetheless, he continued to appear in public, also alongside Benedict XVI.
Not to forget also that in May 2012, when Viganò came into possession of the revelations that today, six years later, made public, he publicly greeted McCarrick during a gala evening, speaking of him as a man "much loved by all of us". Il 10 maggio 2013, he concelebrated Paul VI's synaxis with McCarrick. This is why Viganò's attempt to incriminate Francis and some prelates while exoneration of John Paul II and Benedict XVI, it doesn't hold up.
The last modernist occupants of the See of Peter were all involved in the conspiracy that Viganò highlights, and he himself is compromised with those he accuses today.
During the general hearing of 15 December 2010, Benedict XVI also presented to thousands of faithful gathered in the Paul VI room in the Vatican, an acrobatic act by the Gay Circus, created by half-naked men whose aim was openly to promote homosexuality.
http://resistance-catholique.org/articles_html/2011/01/RC_2011-01-24_un-spectacle-revelateur-au-vatican.html
Just before this indecent and repugnant spectacle, Benedict XVI had publicly justified the use of condoms "in certain cases"., particularly for a male “prostitute”.! Statements as scandalous as those of his successor (who am I to judge gays?); a Bergoglio who was seen conspicuously shaking hands with a homosexual priest in favor of the marriage of inverts and the ordination of sodomite clerics; a Bergoglio who received militant transsexuals in the Vatican, in whose company he enjoyed being photographed; a Bergoglio who went to visit LGBT lobby organizations very officially, like when during his trip to Paraguay, in July 2015, publicly met the representative of “Somos gay”, a collective of lesbians, gay, bisexuals and transsexuals!
Under these conditions, this explains how with the election of Francis in 2013, McCarrick was able to prosper.
It must be said that McCarrick and Bergoglio are long-time friends. In the 2014, McCarrick fell ill while celebrating mass, and was taken to hospital. Right away, the phone rings: it is Bergoglio who shows up with the news. Just kidding, McCarrick says he's fine. «Your lodging with the devil is not yet ready», Francesco answers him. A joke that takes on a particularly sinister color.
In May 2018, Bergoglio persists and signs. The man in white takes a trip to the Holy Land, McCarrick is in the game. Bergoglio sees it and, affectionately, greets him by saying: «The bad grass never dies».
These are not anecdotes drawn from some source hostile to the modernists in the Vatican, but things told by McCarrick himself to compliant journalists, who wrote a laudatory article of the "cardinal" in 2014, for the
National Catholic Reporter.
Here we are not talking about a certain circle that would be corrupt, of a man in white left in ignorance, prevented from doing the good he would like to do. Viganò points an accusing finger in Francis' direction, invites him to resign, because he knows, for speaking to him personally, that Francis knew perfectly well about McCarrick's crimes since his election. Viganò writes that «We need to proclaim a time of conversion and penance. It is necessary to recover the virtue of chastity in the clergy and seminaries. We must fight against the corruption of the improper use of the Church's resources and the offerings of the faithful. We must denounce the seriousness of homosexual conduct. It is necessary to eradicate the homosexual networks existing in the Church"
And the accusation against Francis is violent: «If this is rightly to be considered a grave moral responsibility for every believer, how much more serious it is for the supreme pastor of the Church, who in the case of McCarrick not only did not oppose evil but associated himself in committing evil with those he knew to be deeply corrupt, he followed the advice of someone he knew was perverse, thus multiplying exponentially with his supreme authority the evil done by McCarrick. And how many other bad shepherds is Francis still continuing to support in their action of destroying the Church! […] Francis is abdicating the mandate that Christ gave to Peter to confirm his brothers. Indeed, with his action he divided them, misleads them, encourages the wolves to continue to tear apart the sheep of Christ's flock."
“Cardinal” McCarrick, 88 years, he resigned on 28 July 2018, when he was accused of child sexual abuse, perpetrated in the 1970s when he was just a priest in New York. For the shape, Bergoglio has brought the usual sanctions back into vogue: retreat into a life of prayer and penance. His case is solved, and on the other hand McCarrick is not Viganò's target. The revelations of the former Nuncio have only one purpose: the fall of Francis, for reasons specific to Viganò and his environment. One would have to be very naive to believe that a representative of the conciliar sect is guided by love for the truth.
How the main interested party reacts to the accusations? Upon returning from his demagogic visit to Ireland, on the plane that took him back to the country of homosexual orgies and drug use, to the journalists who questioned him about the Viganò scandal, the man in white gave a surprising answer: “Read the document carefully and judge for yourself. I won't say a word about it. I think the document speaks for itself. […] When some time passes and you have your conclusions, Maybe I'll do the talking."
Bergoglio hopes that in our instant civilization other scandals can erase the current one and so he can escape judgement? We are still faced with the contempt and contempt that he expressed upon his return from Chile. At the time of his “election”, in many newspapers a drawing was reproduced that represented him as a superhero armed with his suitcase on which the word "Values" was written in large letters. When it comes to superheroes, we're dealing with a real comic book villain: evil, diabolical, Machiavellian.
The conciliar sect is a true brothel of pederasts. Baptized Catholics will be shaken by this generalized rot and cynicism? Unfortunately many of those who will be, they risk losing their faith and hating a Catholic Church which they wrongly confuse with the conciliar sect. The torrent of apostasy, already full, risks overflowing. But that's not how you should react: these abominable scandals, which are anything but isolated cases, they must allow Catholics to open their eyes to the imposture that is the conciliar sect. If it is an impurity sewer, it is not a sign that the truth is not preached there, the true faith is not taught there, that the true sacraments are not dispensed there? How can one believe that a man who is not content with blaspheming and deceiving the faithful can be the Vicar of Christ, promises Heaven to atheists, encourages fornication in an encyclical, he warmly receives sodomites, destroys the indissolubility of marriage?
Viganò also considers that Bergoglio is unworthy of the role he has usurped. Attention, don't be fooled: John Paul II and Benedict XVI were certainly no better than Francis. They too have apostatized, they covered for pedophiles, scandals have multiplied, they complacently visited the mosques and synagogues, have received B'nai B'rith with praise, they have made the false humanist and Holocaust cult their own. They canonize one another at great speed, while in reality they are supporters of Hell.
These sensational and extremely disgusting stories can at least open the eyes of the faithful to the fact that, as the Holy Virgin announced in La Salette, «Rome has lost the Faith and has become the seat of the Antichrist».
It is not surprising that those who destroyed the Mass, the missal, the breviary, faith, religious constitutions, Catholic doctrine and morality, who have thrown away the ecclesiastical habit, who chose the world and not Christ, who fight the known truth, one of the sins against the Holy Spirit, who promote in a hidden and open manner the crimes against nature which the Catechism of Saint Pius, they indulge in the worst abjections.
Their fate is already sealed:
«
Whoever scandalizes even one of these little ones who believe in me, it would be better for him if a millstone turned like a donkey were hung around his neck, and was thrown into the depths of the sea.» (Matteo, XVIII, 6).
Of Jerome Bourbon
Editorial of the issue 3348 of Rivarol – 17 October 2018
Homosexual orgies in the Vatican, pedophile scandals: there is no continent, not a corner of land that is spared from the crimes of modernist "priests" or "bishops"., from Ireland to Australia, from the United States to Chile. Every now and again, the denunciation of a pedophile priest fills the headlines. Then the indignant clamor dies down, the thing is forgotten. As soon as another episode comes out, Here we are back to the usual conversations: celibacy is to blame, the fault lies with the refusal of contraception, conservatism is to blame. As if marrying priests would solve the problem of pedophilia... unless you want to consider marrying them to boys!