Dissolution of state factors

Of Luciano Del Vecchio
Dissolution of state factors
Source: Appeal to the People
For about a quarter of a century, a massive and progressive occupation of power by supranational private potentates has been modifying and distorting the legal nature of the modern state, which seems to revert from a state of law to a balance sheet. Globalization has taken hold and digital technology has developed, the rule of law, which is based on legislative activity, the division of powers and on the prevalence of a Constitution, has progressively lost ground. On the one hand, the constitutional changes were inspired by the principle of the minimal state of liberal ideology, on the other the constitutional norms, escaped the distortion and liberal tampering, are not concretely applied by quisling because they are postponed, in the source hierarchy, to the rules of the European treaties. Our Constitutional Court, interpreting the art too broadly. 11 Cost., it established the superiority of treaties over domestic law: ruling that the courts of other countries, Germany in the lead, they were careful not to adopt. He moved in parallel with the judges a political class That, educated by history and home tradition to transformism, he felt no scruples of dignity and coherence in crossing all sides from one pole to the other, to finally recognize oneself as uniformed and flattened everything on liberal ideology: This group was and still is the most suitable to transpose and slavishly apply the tables of the law, not just the orders of the European Commission, but also simple agreements dictated by international trade or financial organizations. Magistrates, politicians, academics, intellectuals, commentators and TV commentators, a whole army of attendants to hand over power into private hands, they were raised and "fed" in the climate of political revolution, economic and technological that, since the end of the 80s of the last century, it destroyed the old cultural and legal categories of public law. Today an economic and financial oligarchy, intentionally stateless or cosmopolitan, which becomes law with the power of money and technology, it replaced the rule of law, invalidating the ancient definitions of legal science e, with a new modality in history, exercises real power detached from the idea of ​​the State, indifferent to the territory, foreign or hostile to the people. Handing over the structure of state power into private hands involves not so much the elimination of the State as the last and only institution to defend the community of citizens and the general interest, as much as its metamorphosis: the rule of law historically and politically relegates itself to a patrimonial state of absolutist memory.
Read More

Share

Book news: "Fascisti prima di Mussolini" (Ed. Seventh Seal)

Report Seventh Seal Editions
New Seventh Seal

Seventh Seal

Sideri Rodolfo Culture
pag. 266

EURO 22,00
ISBN 978-88-61481-97-8

PAPERBACK

Fascism between history and revolution.

Among the kaleidoscopic images of fascism, the autobiography that the Mussolini movement wanted to offer about itself has often been underestimated. Through the analysis of “precursors” it is instead possible to read against the light what fascism deemed itself to embody and represent in the construction not only of a new social order, but also of a lifestyle inspired by a peculiar vision of the world.
During the twenty years of the regime, the debate developed in the contrast between those who believed that in these constructions fascism was in continuity with national history and that only in this continuity would the achievements that were carried out have the necessary solidity to last and those who instead believed that fascism should present itself as a radical revolution that constituted a clear break with the historical past of the nation.
If fascism did not clearly choose one of the two positions it is because it was still looking for its own ideological definition, but the necklaces dedicated to the pre-fascists and the forerunners, the parliamentary debate and even some statements by Mussolini himself, although reluctant to recognize precursors for his creation, lead us to lean towards the continuity thesis.
An inevitable propensity in a movement that considered the historical dimension of the individual and the State to be indispensable.

Read More

Share
1 2