Avvenire promotes gender/queer theology?


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reporting of Roman correspondence
Of Lupo Glori
While the Catholic Church (official, n.d.r.) she is overwhelmed, from one end of the world to the other, the daily newspaper of the bishops from shameful sexual scandals Future, in its supplement of 29 last July dedicated to world gathering of families which opens in Dublin, clears gender theory, by publishing an article in which the "goodness" of an unlikely theology from a "gender" perspective is exposed and, why not, also “queer”.
It is the theologian who advances the bold thesis Lucia Vantini, from the Facolthas Theology of the Triveneto, with an abstruse text, written according to the artificial and cryptic genderist language, in which the professor exposes her very personal gender-oriented "theology"., in his own words, ”not even the prospect is excluded a priori queer“.
In fact, Vantini explains how the Coordination of Italian theologians of which he is vice president, “is committed to a theology of gender” That “promises inclusiveness, (…) and provokes the male world to account for its own bodily and perspective partiality, masked under the sign of neutral even in theology. However, in this research of women the epistemology of difference and the politics of equality find space and are not excluded, a priori, not even the queer perspective, with its precious deconstructive force of the explicit and implicit stereotypes of the Christian symbolic order. These are epistemologies that do not foresee a definitive transition from one to the other but which open a spiral process towards the depth of the sexual being”.
Objective of the intervention of the Faculty teacherhas Theology of the Triveneto is to claim and demonstrate the feminist origin of the expression "sexual difference", improperly used, according to him, as an “anti-gender weapon” by detractors of gender theory, proposing its own particular reinterpretation. Read More

Share

Who says capital punishment is, in itself, bad, falls into heresy

of the Prof. Roberto De Mattei

The lawfulness of the death penalty is a truth to be held by faith, defined by the ordinary and universal Magisterium of the Church, in a constant and unequivocal manner. Who says capital punishment is, in itself, bad, falls into heresy.

The teaching of the Church was clearly expressed in the letter of 18 December 1208, in which Innocent III condemns the Waldensian position, with these words, reported by Denzinger: «We assert a secular power, that without mortal sin he can exercise the judgment of blood, provided that I do not hate to take revenge, but by judgment, not carelessly, but let him proceed in consultation» ( A handbook of symbols,definitions and declarations on matters of faith and morals, edited by Peter Hünermann S.J., n. 795). (As for secular power, we affirm that the death penalty can be exercised without mortal sin, provided that revenge is exercised not out of hatred, but by judgment, not in an imprudent way, but in moderation).

The same position was reiterated by Catechism of the Council of Trent (Part three, n. 328), dal Catechism maggiore of Saint Pius (Part three, n. 413) and from the new Catechism of the Catholic Church (n. 2267) (albeit invalid because legislated by illegitimate authorities, n.d.r.). Pope Francis (Il “not-pope” Francesco, n.d.r.) he has now signed a rescript that modifies the Catechism (of the Conciliar Counter-Church itself, n.d.r.) with this new formulation: «The Church teaches, in the light of the Gospel, that 'the death penalty is inadmissible because it attacks the inviolability and dignity of the person', and is committed with determination to its abolition throughout the world». Read More

Share