The challenge of the present: globality versus sovereignty

We remember that tonight starting from 21.20 the entitled episode will air on RAI3 “DIO, HOMELAND AND FAMILY”, within which we will also be there “Christ the King-Tradition” in a deferred service from Verona, filmed in October 2018, after the approval of the motions discouraging abortion in the City Council. Tomorrow, Instead, one of our delegations will be the protagonist of a French documentary that will be filmed, in part, in Verona by a crew that will broadcast it in February. Our Matteo Castagna's book on the topic of globalism and sovereignism continues to be talked about, even at a European level. There is already talk of a possible translation into English. Its pink, they will flourish…A.M.D.G.
Of Umberto Bianchi
Read More

Share

Un'analisi strategica sul Populismo


by Umberto Bianchi
I am among those who, without hesitation whatsoever, consider that of the Minister of the Interior Salvini, during his last trip to the Near East, visiting our troops included in the local Unifil mission, on the border between Israel and Lebanon, certainly an unhappy exit. Saying that Hizbollah is a terrorist group, It seems like a stretch and a gross inaccuracy to us, not comforted, among other things, by any fact that can guide us in that direction.
On the contrary. In very recent times, Hizbullah has been actively committed to countering Al-Qaedist terrorist terrorism, sponsored and supported on and off, precisely from that ambiguous "Western Front" (Usa, Great Britain, France, Israel… sic!) so quick to point out which terrorists in the eyes of the world, those who do not align with their strategic desires, just as quick to abandon certain etiquette, to impose its strategic choices "by military means"., with all the disastrous political-military annexes, as in the case of the "Arab Spring" and the Syrian conflict. Read More

Share

The how and why of Populism

Of Umberto Bianchi
The how and why of Populism
Source: Heretically
At the end of a decidedly close electoral contest, the verdict that came out of the polls has, indiscutibilmente, rewarded all those formations that, somehow, they imitate or are themselves considered “populist”. The reference applies to both the League and the Movement 5 position, US President Trump, the transalpina Lady Marine Le Pen, That, in the most recent past for the Forza Italia of the golden times and, really, in very recent times, as if by someone risky, also for Renzi of the original "scrap" version. A term whose meaning has included a bit of everything and its opposite.
But what exactly do we mean by “populism”?? What is the exact political meaning in which this term should be placed, very fashionable nowadays? If we want to refer to the letter of the history of political movements, by “populism” we mean a series of movements that, at the end of the nineteenth century they developed in disparate contexts. In Russia, Populism was represented by the “narodnjki”, whose most authoritative exponents were the colonel and mathematics professor of the Military Academy Pyotr Lavrovič Lavrov, supporter of populism in a socialist key, together with its popularizer and idelogue, the sociologist and literary critic Nikolai Konstantinovič Mikhailovsky, having as its object the emancipation of the peasant masses, starting from the rural/"obscina" community. France instead, began with Paul Deroulede's League of Patriots, che unitasi ad un altro movimento populista di massa, Boulangism (named after Georges Boulanger, charismatic general of the French army) he became an advocate of a radical and revanchist nationalism, always connected to the increasingly widespread discontent of the masses, towards the young French parliamentary republic, much to achieve in 1888-89, after obtaining the support of the monarchists, of significant electoral victories. In the United States it was the People's Party (People’s Party), also known as Populist Party (Populist Party), summarily called "Populists”, which party was established in 1891 in the United States of America which, during the “populist” period, took hold towards the end of the 19th century. Supported by the lower classes, especially by cultivators hostile towards elites in general, had its peak between 1892 and the 1896. Read More

Share