A Treviso va in scena il "Canestri-monio"…
Reporting of G.T.
LAWS: https://video.corriere.it/prete-sfida-sposo-fai-canestro-matrimonio-andra-bene-ecco-come-va-finire/adbc1f3a-6dbc-11e8-9b64-3ff7a67664c8
Mattarella's no? Between political choices and strong powers
Written and reported by Marco Milioni
The reasons why the President of the Republic Sergio Mattarella he de facto said no to an executive made up of Lega and M5S with Paolo Savona at the Economy and Giuseppe Conte as Prime Minister they are the subject of a very harsh clash. And they will be for a long time. And as happens in such cases, the reasons for such drastic choices trigger reactions of all kinds: there are insults on the web. There is the harsh and thoughtful criticism of a high-ranking constitutionalist like Massimo Villone, until reaching the j'accuse by Massimo Fini and Ugo Mattei. All this suggests that the stakes are very high.
Now it would be important to be able to understand whether the head of state's niet really only has generic correlations with the need to protect savers or if there is something else underneath. First of all, who are the savers that Mattarella is referring to?? It is Mr. Bianchi and Mrs. Rossi who have put away some BTP? They are the large stakeholders who professionally make profit from the public debt of nations? To try to shed some light on this cave, it is necessary to account for an indiscretion that has been circulating for several hours among the Venetian parliamentarians recently elected between Palazzo Madama and Montecitorio.. An indiscretion according to which people very close to Mattarella would have advised the head of state against allowing a minister considered disinclined to the wishes of large investors in government bonds to set his sights on the chest which at the Ministry of Economy contains one of the best kept and most controversial secrets of recent years: that of derivatives subscribed by the State to guarantee public debt. Read More
Infrastructure, the rumors and the Venetian lead
Of Marco Milioni
Hello dear readers,
I believe that these rumors that run along the Veneto-Rome axis could interest you. We talk about the infrastructure department…
The rumors come from Rome. As part of the formation of the new government led by the Northern League and Five Star Movement, some Venetian names would have been circulated for the infrastructure department, one of the most strategic. These are names that are not only eligible for the ministerial position, but also for that of undersecretary. The first is that of Silvano Vernizzi, today CEO of Veneto Strade, he was for a long time the extraordinary government commissioner for the Veneto Pedemontana. His choice would be at Lega quota but very well appreciated by Fi circles. Another name that is circulating is that of Massimo Colomban, former councilor for subsidiaries in the municipality of Rome in the M5S council, He has a past in the centre-right and would not be unwelcome to the League. The latest name circulating is that of Massimo Malvestio, well-known lawyer from Treviso, known for being one of Zaia's spin doctors, in his case his name would have been proposed without the interested party being immediately made aware of it. Rumors have already circulated among the M5S base that they would not have liked the three names because they were considered too close to the Venetian infrastructure establishment. In the Region that once belonged to the Serenissima, some more delicate games are being played in the field of great works. Just think of the conclusion of the MOSE, to the Marghera reclamation, to the canals for large ships and the Pedemontana Veneta, the Valdastico Nord and the Orte Mestre not to mention the Tav Brescia, Verona Vicenza, Padova. These are projects opposed by the M5S and instead by the League, in a coalition with the centre-right he has always supported it. As has been explained several times in the national press (from Fatto and Corsera first and foremost) right in Veneto, in terms of infrastructure, a crucial game will be played for the country, within which it will be important to understand how much the lobbies that operate behind the infrastructure sector will be able to make their weight felt on the unborn government.