Anche le teorie fasciste in materia di razza sono discusse, but welcomed. In writing 1 (a), Degasperi records the improvement in Austria's economic conditions following the expropriation of Jewish property. The text says that «The liquidation of Jewish fortunes broadens business prospects for others, and vacant lawyer and medical positions provide an outlet for careers». The column is from July 1938. In writing 2(second) (August 1938), which shortly precedes the enactment of the racial laws, Degasperi tries to detach fascist theories from Nazism. And he proposes to refer to the universalist element of fascism which «can be nourished by the living traditions of Christian Rome». Degasperi hopes that «Italian racism is implemented in concrete measures to defend and enhance the nation». In writing 3(third) dated March 1938, Degasperi retraces the cultural and political parable of the Austrian Christian Social Party, led by Karl Lueger. Degasperi captures the positive aspects, minimizing its anti-Semitism (era “solo” a «necessary policy of economic defense»). The fourth document, dated May 1938, comments on the Hungarian government's measures to stem anti-Semitism. However, Degasperi points out how Jews are preponderant in key roles in the economy. The Jews are therefore understandable «they can only practice a profession up to a certain percentage». The last extract, dated May 1938, reports a statement from Orthodox Jews who want to distinguish themselves from "Jews included in communism". And here we get a different note: «This tendency of Orthodox Jews to separate their responsibility from that of the Jews included in communism is characteristic of the moment we are going through». It sounds like a harsh judgment on the present that forces Jews to fight internally to escape persecution. It is clear that this change of views cannot be attributed to an ideological rethinking, but certainly of opportunities. His severe judgments against the Jews changed favorably. There's Sereni, Roman Jew, born Ascarelli, he was the Italian head of the Mossad for expatriation operations towards Palestine. Herself in her book The illegal immigrants of the sea (Milano, Mursia, 1973), tells of the meeting he had with Alcide Degasperi to obtain tacit coverage from the Italian government and secret services on the activities that the Mossad should have carried out in Italy to get its fellow countrymen from Northern Europe to arrive and then expatriate towards the Holy Land. Sereni asked Degasperi to «turn a blind eye, and possibly two on our activities in Italy". Eric Salerno comments: «From the beginning, Italians became aware of clandestine immigration and the temporary camps where Jews arriving from the rest of Europe were hosted, but not only did they turn a blind eye, they helped when and how they could. They also helped in the next phase, when the Mossad, parallel to illegal immigration, he engaged in the military training of refugees, in the acquisition of weapons and their transport to Palestine, in the fight to prevent the Arabs from arming themselves even when this meant sabotaging Italian industries and plants and their products. […] Aside from the ambiguous relationships, artfully constructed, so as not to foreclose the potentially rich Arab markets […], Italy would not have been hostile even to Israel".
In addition to his ideological positions, a bit’ more light needs to be shed on other questionable choices. Indeed, it was Alcide Degasperi himself with a letter addressed to the American colonel A.D. Bonham Carter, to urge the bombing of the outskirts of Rome, the aqueduct and other strategic objectives. The decision was justified by Degasperi with these words: “Unfortunately it is painful for us, but it is necessary to insist again, so that the Roman population decides to rise up alongside us, that bombing actions must not be spared in the peripheral area of ​​the city as well as on the reported military objectives. This action, which we call upon with all our hearts, it is the only one that will be able to break the last moral resistance of the Roman people, if particularly will be taken, what objective, the aqueduct, vital nerve point. We are also urgently needed, and in the shortest possible time the already requested supply having reached the limit”. Alcide wrote these things aware that Rome had been declared “open city”. The institute of “Open City” it is not regulated by International Law: it simply means that the city has no defensive or offensive means and is therefore exempt from both aerial bombardment and ground attacks. After the 13 August 1943 Rome suffered well 51 bombings until 4 June 1944 when General Mark Clark's Fifth Army entered Rome. This document was published by the writer Giovanni Guareschi in the weekly magazine “Facing – sniper pum” and the consequences did not take long to materialize, because not only was there an outcry in favor of Degasperi who was head of the government but poor Guareschi was sued and convicted of defamation, served his sentence 409 days in prison and six months of probation. Even from a religious point of view, Degasperi was far from obedient to the Catholic Church. Close to the Rome municipal elections of the year 1952. On this occasion, in order to avoid the victory of the communists, Pope Pius XII invited the Christian Democrats of "Degasperi" to form a center-right coalition with monarchists and the neo-fascists of the Italian Social Movement, but he refused to obey the worried request that came to him from the Vatican. The Jesuit Father Giovanni Sale has published an essay (“From monarchy to republic”, Jaca Book, Milano, 2003) in which there is a perfect description of Degasper's oscillations between fidelity to the social doctrine of the Church and timid deference to the contrary opinions of progressives. The year was running “constituent” 1946, when a distinguished legal philosopher, Guido Gonella, presentò al congresso democristiano un eccellente schema di costituzione, boldly stating: “noi non vogliamo una costituzione di partito…ma la costituzione del popolo italiano. But the Italian people are Christian people, e quindi nel nostro Paese i principi generali della politica e del diritto pubblico devono essere conformi all’etica cristiana”. Degasperi bocciò la proposta Gonella con un tortuoso e ipocrita ragionamento: “il discorso di Gonella è stata una magnifica esposizione della costituzione. If I had to make a note, it's just that: he was too much of a theologian. This, absolutely speaking, it's not a flaw, ma sul terreno tattico della lotta con gli avversari può dar luogo a contraccolpi inaspettati”. Fidelity to social doctrine can give rise to dangerous backlashes; it is therefore better to follow the advice of Christian Democratic prudence and abdicate principles.
Faced with such demonstrations of crime, one wonders if Cornelio Fabro was wrong when he hurled his scorching invective against “the cowardice of Christian and even Catholic ministers and prelates – as in Italy – to fight and have people fight openly (as the Gospel intended) the approval of the infamous divorce law (1974) and the incomparably more infamous one of abortion" (“Reflections on freedom”, Edivi, Signs, 2004).
Augusto Del Noce maintained that the de-Christianization of Italy was implemented with great responsibility by the Christian Democrats...
Degasperi did nothing for the Italian infoibati living beyond the Adriatic and the exile of 310.000 Istrians, Fiumeans and Dalmatians. The American government would have wanted a plebiscite referendum for the cession of Fiume, Istria and Dalmatia to Yugoslavia. Degasperi opposed it, because if he had granted the plebiscite to the Italians of Pola, Zadar and Ragusa, should have also granted it to Alto Adige. The result of the plebiscites would certainly have ruled that the lands of Istria, Fiume and Dalmatia should have remained with Italy, while Alto Adige could have passed to Austria, with the consequence that it could not justify the special autonomy that Trentino enjoys today (“The exodus of the 350 000 Giuliani Fiumani and Dalmatians” ed. ADRIATIC DEFENSE by Father Flaminio Rocchi).
Degasperi was surpassed only by the Moro government in terms of repression of homosexuality.
Dario Petrosino writes on "History and Future" on the basis of documentation preserved in the Central State Archives: “In the reports to the police chief preserved in the Central State Archives (Ministry of the Interior, general department of public safety), the consistency of the phenomenon clearly emerges: data collection begins in November 1952 and already in that year they were carried out in just two months 518 police measures that rise to 1117 In the 1953 e 1407 In the 1954. And 1955 a decline begins which sees the number of measures fall 671 and just above i 600 in the following years. Then the curve starts to rise again and in the mid-1960s, even more homosexuals came under the scrutiny of public security.: 1474 In the 1964, ben 3062 In the 1965. We can state with quick calculation that between 1952 and the 1965 were carried out in Italy by the police more than 11 thousand measures between arrests, warnings, warns, arrests and sendings to confinement of homosexuals.
I conclude, reporting the quote from an autobiography by Ettore Bernabei published in 1998. The Trentino statesman signed an infamous agreement with Raffaele Mattioli, agreement that assigned political power to the DC, cultural and financial power to Freemasonry, sworn enemy of the Catholic Church.
source – http://www.emiliogiuliana.com/2-uncategorised/48-alcide-degasperi-anti-ebreo-acattolico-modello-e-riferimento-della-sinistra-e-catto-comunisti.html