Pope Francis has just signed the new one Document on Human Fraternity.. see here, with the Imam of Al-Azhar Ahmad Al-Tayyeb. A BROTHERHOOD WITHOUT JESUS CHRIST, BUT WITH THE GOD OF ISLAM, a faceless and nameless God…
- “A document – states the text – reasoned with sincerity and seriousness to be a common declaration of good and loyal will, such as to invite all people who carry in their hearts faith in God and faith in human brotherhood to unite and work together, so that it becomes a guide for the new generations towards the culture of mutual respect, in understanding the great divine grace that makes all human beings brothers…”
And Jesus?? simple, for Pope Francis IT IS IN THE BROTHER… Faith in God? BUT IN WHICH GOD? And therefore no longer faith in Jesus Christ, but IN THE HUMAN BROTHERHOOD... within which "Jesus" is immersed, hidden, anonymous! In the Angelus on New Year's Day, ditto: Bergoglio stated that the name of God is Lord! But this is theologically false because for US Catholics the Name of God is JESUS, as Saint Paul explains to the Philippians. 2,5-11 “so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow in heaven, on the earth and under the earth; and let every tongue declare that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.” Then when we read the Gospel at Mass, what do we answer at the end? LODE TO YOU THE CHRIST! And the reading of the Gospel is not “Word of God, of the Lord"? In short: Jesus is God yes or no!?
The Document then plays a beautiful series of “IN THE NAME OF...” and we start FROM GOD according to the syncretistic vision of a "generic god” without a face and without a name, and then state that in THE NAME OF EVERYONE ELSE: of the soul, of the poor, of the needy and the marginalized, of the miserable... IN THE NAME of the orphans, of widows, of refugees and exiles, even those who live in fear (??); of the peoples OF FREEDOM, of justice and mercy; in short, IN THE NAME OF EVERYONE WITHOUT ANY DISTINCTION.. (but Jesus is excluded).. concludes the official text:
- “Al-Azhar al-Sharif – with Muslims of East and West –, together with the Catholic Church – with the Catholics of the East and the West –, they declare to adopt the culture of dialogue as a way forward; common collaboration as conduct; mutual knowledge as a method and criterion…
He is the God of Islam, of the Koran, the God that Islam believes in….?? and for which faith however Jesus is NOT the God they talk about and for which Bergoglio signed! You can see it in the signature that he is NOT that God of the Catholic Church, but that the Muslims of the East and the West TOGETHER WITH THE CATHOLIC CHURCH.. they declare to adopt the culture of dialogue as a way forward.. while THE WAY IS JESUS CHRIST!! (Gv.14,6). It is therefore inevitable to think that Bergoglio has REJECTED JESUS CHRIST in the name of the god of Islam, or of a faceless and nameless god, generico, that doesn't bother anyone!
The thoughtful commentary in is also very interesting Church and post-council, Who.
It is clear that the Document aims at UNIVERSAL PEACE in defense of religions, but AGAINST those who are not mentioned: WHO THREATENES RELIGIONS? Who threatens religions today? WHO IS PERSECUTING CHRISTIANS? Pope Francis pretends not to see or hear…
The text is a real "drop of the pants" of the false church of Bergoglio to evangelization because, it is also stated, that THIS DOCUMENT be used as a study text IN SCHOOLS….. a true APOSTASY from the true Faith in Christ Jesus, we had described here the features of this "chronicle of a death foretold".
The TRUE CHURCH, on the passage from Mark reported above, teaches the following and which we report from various patristic texts on the Gospels:
After Pietro's protest, because of which Jesus harshly admonishes him: turned and looked at his disciples, he rebuked Peter and said: «Go after me, Satan! Because you don't think according to God, but according to men»…. the disciples now find themselves faced with a new decision.
Called to you: expression that Mark uses for important teachings.
deny himself: aparneomai; or, place the following of Jesus above one's own desires and plans. Cf. Lc 14,26. The verb appears only once again in Mark when Peter denies Jesus (14,30.31.71-72). And in the Gospels nothing is random or written "by chance".
take up his cross: Mark presents the following of the cross in the example of Simon of Cyrene (15,21); he will be ashamed of me: being ashamed is here considered more serious than denying the detail reported by Luke 12,9. It is not a denial out of fear or misgivings, it's not in a psychological sense, but as the objective behavior of A CHOICE, Jesus' warning is serious, in that being ashamed of talking about HIM is an act against him.
The adulterous and sinful generation is the place where we are ashamed (and we will be ashamed in time) of Jesus, of his Name and his words.
The Son of Man: it is the scene that brings us to His return, alla parusia.
While the first part of the sentence only presents the case of those who are ready to lose their lives, the second offers the opposite. Follow Jesus and die for HIM, without being ashamed of Him, therefore means “to save one's life”; the case of the one, Instead, “who wants to save his life”, ashamed of Jesus, of his holy Name and his words, upon his glorious return, that is, on the day of his Judgment, Jesus will be ashamed of him, that is, he will lose his life.
Thus the vision of the Kingdom of God, the experience of salvation and what awaits us, it is not postponed until after death, in the future world, to the judgment, but it is already present, “here” and now. God's mercy delays the curse until the end, but from now on he gives the blessing, but he also curses the one who will be ashamed of Him, thinking in this way of saving his own life, coming to lose it. Jesus warns, he is warning and is warning his Disciples, bringing us back to a very disturbing question: «When the Son of Man returns, he will still find faith on earth?» (Lc 18, 8); as if to make us reflect - to save ourselves in time - how we could have betrayed him, or we were ashamed of HIM, since, Judgment has arrived, who will be ashamed of Him, he will certainly perish.
Let's conclude:
Uniting religions under the “one God” recognized by all to form the “universal brotherhood” is typical of modernist thought («synthesis of all heresies», Saint Pius X, the encyclical of the Feeding of the flock of Dominic, 8 September 1907, see here).
It is emblematic, for example, the case of the priest Don Primo Vannutelli (1885-1945), – friend and collaborator of the “grand old man” of Italian modernism, the apostate priest Ernesto Bonaiuto (1891-1946) – which, after being suspended a divinis in the 1930s, to be rehabilitated he withdrew all his writings and recited the anti-modernist oath, but it was a perjury. Indeed, before dying, wrote his “spiritual testament” – published posthumously in 1978 with the title The testament of faith by Don Primo Vannutelli – in which he proclaimed that he loved Jesus Christ, but he declared that he did not believe that He was the incarnate Word of God. The only way to unite the “Abrahamic religions” (Judaism, Christianity and Islam) era, according to Vannutelli, finally drop the thesis of the divinity of Jesus. A coincidence?
The Jesuits have unfortunately made modernism their own, denying Christ in the name of Christ! Proof of this is the fact that the cast of the film "Silence", where it is said that the Japanese Jesuit missionaries renounced in order to save their lives with the "permission" of Jesus, was welcomed with a standing ovation by the leaders of the new Company and also by Pope Francis at Casa Santa Marta….
The brief reflection from the CampariedeMaistre website is interesting:
The concept. If all religions are the same, what are you doing??
– with, as he says, the document “Pluralism and religious diversity […] I am a wise divine will, with which God created human beings", why Jesus came to be crucified? He was wrong? According to Bergoglio, what value would the Cross and Resurrection have?? Sono necessarie si o no? Se pensa di no, cosa vuole da noi?
– se le religioni portano tutte, come dice il documento, “veri insegnamenti”, perché allora ci sono preti, vescovi e papi? A questo punto si dimettano tutti e ci diano i soldi indietro.
source – https://cronicasdepapafrancisco.com/2019/02/04/bergoglio-firma-documento-musulmano-rinnegando-gesu-cristo/
