Fairy tales and the fear of not being loved

Reporting of BastaBugie editorial team
Fairy tales are where we keep monsters (ad es.: resentment because others seem to be loved more than us)
Of Silvana De Mari

Fairy tales arise by themselves, no one knows where, choral and anonymous; they evolve bit by bit, they travel through centuries and across places, undergoing all possible modifications, but always remaining the same. Fairy tales have fantastic and magical protagonists and must not exceed the space of an afternoon spent by the fire and, above all, that of one evening, because their main job is to fill the “before going to bed”, so that the child can drift off to sleep lulled by the adult's voice, without the monsters that live inside the darkness being able to disturb him. Monsters are the fear of not being loved, the resentment of not being loved, jealousy because others are or seem to be loved more than us. Fairy tales are where we keep monsters. As Kafka intuits, fairy tales are the gold and silver boxes where we keep monsters.
The monsters are unspeakable. Negative emotions are not always allowed for children, especially to those who would have the most reason to have it: therefore it is appropriate to hide them inside a fairy tale and try them out through a third party, identifying with the main character. Read More

Share

Iranophobia

Report Arianna Publishing
Of Sebastiano Caputo
Iranophobia
Source: The newspaper

How Western media covered up a social protest (predominantly male).

Seven years of proxy war on Syria they have taught foreign policy commentators nothing who once again blindly follow an anti-Iranian narrative spread across the board think tank neoconservativesand by more intellectuals progressives of the so-called "free world". In short, those who were considered Donald Trump's fiercest opponents during the election campaign quickly sided with him to blow on a small protest broke out in Khorasan, now spread across the country. To understand the approach of the Western media, it is necessary first of all to study electoral geography. The demonstrations did not begin in the capital Tehran (quasi 20 millions of inhabitants), stronghold of Rohani and the reformists (insider of theocracy as much as the others), but in deep Iran, where modernist mythology is not even touched upon by the collective imagination, so much so that conservatives are precisely in those areas (lay and religious) they get plenty of votes. The reasons that therefore pushed people to take to the streets were dictated by rejection of the current ruling class, accused of corruption and price increases, and not an entire system, Islamic government, as most commentators who ignore the complexity of this country want us to believe. Read More

Share

Non si può più nascondere l'impoverimento dei Paesi occidentali

Poor
The golden age is slowly fading, the gap between poor and rich is increasing, the United States and Great Britain are transforming from “showcases of humanity” the focus of poverty.
The golden age is slowly fading, the gap between poor and rich is increasing, the United States and Great Britain are transforming from “showcases of humanity” the focus of poverty. We are talking about the conclusions of the UN and the world's leading economists. The report was recently published “On Inequality in the World” (“Inequality in the world”) which they worked on further 100 economists from different countries. This team was led by the Frenchman Thomas Piketty, author of the best-selling book “Capital in the 21st century”. The statistics collected by him and his colleagues demonstrate unequivocally that the capitalism that citizens of the former Soviet Union prayed for thirty years ago no longer exists in nature.
Today's capitalism is much more likely to resemble the novels of Charles Dickens: the rich get richer, the poor become impoverished. Both live in ghettos: the rich in surveilled areas, the others in public housing. Social elevators, if they work, they only move downwards.
The authors of the study analyzed the growth rate of incomes in different segments of the population over the last few years 36 years. E’ it emerged that starting from 1980 1% of humanity has come to possess the 27% of world wealth, while the 4% of wealth is held by 0,001% of the world population, that is, by the 76 thousand richest people in the world.

At the same time the growth rate of incomes of “middle class” it has slowed down and today it has almost stopped. If the current trend of impoverishment of the masses and enrichment of the super rich continues, In the 2050 lo 0,15% of the world's population will possess the wealth of the entire world middle class. Basically, this means that by 2050 there will be no middle class: it will be swallowed up by the poor.

Piketty's report highlights an interesting regularity. Economic inequality is growing fastest in the world's major economies. The success of the radiant billionaires is repaid by the squeezed and impoverished population of the developed countries.
In the 1980 1% of US citizens owned the 22% of national wealth. Today the same percentage of rich people already own the 39%. Amazon owner Jeff Bezos added 33 billion dollars to his fortune last year and last November he was proclaimed the richest man in the world with a total fortune estimated at 100,3 billions of dollars.

More or less the same picture is taking shape in Britain. In the 1984 the super rich 1% held the 15% of national wealth, now the 22%. Over the last thirty years, says Piketty, the leading countries of the Western world have reached the same level of economic inequality as the countries of Africa and the Middle East, traditionally disadvantaged in this sense.
The record growth in the assets of 1% of the population is paid for by the majority of the working class: An epidemic of poverty has broken out in the stereotypical countries of well-being. La Joseph Rowntree Foundation, a charity that has been fighting poverty in the UK for over a hundred years, he deals with 14 millions of poor British citizens. This number represents one fifth of the country's total population. In “difficult conditions”, according to the institution, they live 4 million children and almost 2 millions of elderly people.

The situation cannot even be reversed by unemployment at historic lows for England. An increasingly larger portion of the salary is lost to increasingly expensive bills and rents, while all savings are consumed by inflation. This situation does not allow citizens to accumulate a decent pension. Buying your own home is becoming increasingly prohibitive for workers: Real estate prices have made home ownership a true luxury.

The US Census Bureau counts people as poor 41 millions of Americans (12,7% of the population), however, many sociologists and NGOs believe this data is underestimated. At the same time the 32,6% of the total number of poor are children and among the homeless the percentage of children is 21%.

Population impoverishment in America has become so severe that monitoring by the United Nations special rapporteur on poverty and human rights issues Philip Alston began in December. Alston promised to analyze how poverty affects the rights of Americans “taking into account the importance that the American administration attributes to the issue of human rights in its foreign policy.” His trip to the States included California with its homeless people, West Virginia with unemployed miners, Alabama with the long-standing poverty of people of color and the State of Washington, where the working class suddenly became poorer.
Finally Alston issued a report, some passages of which recall the dark times of “Great Depression” and of “wild capitalism”:

“I saw open-air toilets at the doors of houses where the government does not provide sewerage… I saw people who had lost all their teeth, since medical insurance for the poorest does not include dental care… I have seen families cry for their loved ones who died from an opioid overdose.”

Alston compared the United States to other developed countries. It turned out that the gap between the poor and the rich in America is the largest in the world. The US is also among the leaders in terms of youth impoverishment: il 25% of young Americans are considered needy in the face of the 13% of peers from other developed countries. Worse still, Americans now have a shorter life expectancy, they get sick more often: this trend is only getting worse.

At the same time, many myths and stereotypes have been debunked. For example, the one according to which the poor are exclusively people of color “lazy” who live on social benefits. In reality the white beggars are 8 million more than African-Americans. Most of them have been looking for work for years, but automated production dashed their hopes. But also those who have a job, no longer guaranteed a dignified life.
Walmart workers told Alston that at the supermarkets of the world's largest retail chain they receive such a small salary that they can only get by on coupons for free products..

In Russia people think that the standard of living in the West is so high that complaints about poverty are a consumer whim “spoiled”. Furthermore, poverty in countries that symbolize well-being is not as shocking as it is in Africa or India and goes unnoticed before the eyes of tourists.

But there is one detail. The people in the streets are dressed decently because clothes are sold at rock-bottom prices during the sales. Pensioners can afford a cappuccino or coffee at the bar, but their homes are without heating for months: it's too expensive. The hidden nature of this poverty does not make it any less painful. In the most advanced countries of the world, millions of people regularly suffer from hunger and cold. Meat disappears from their menu, there isn't enough money to buy it. Their credit cards are deep in the red and they have no way to pay off their debt.

We are used to making fun of the English, who start to worry as soon as it snows. Because we don't understand that for most families, the cold involves enormous heating costs. To save money, pensioners don't turn it on at night, and in the morning they find them frozen. In the 2016 40thousands of people died this way. On average during the winter every 7 minutes an elderly Englishman dies from the cold in his own home. E’ the expression even appeared “heating poverty” (“fuel poverty”), that is striking 2,3 million English families and 800 thousand Scottish.

Millions of Brits are being forced to get free food parcels from food banks. The largest network of these charities is The Trussel Trust. Last year the foundation distributed 1,18 millions of kits with food for three days, including 446 thousand children.

In the first half of 2017 the number of deliveries of these parcels has increased in several regions since 12% al 30%, in December the foundation asked its donors for greater efforts, warning that otherwise he would not be able to give free food to the needy for Christmas.
In this context, near Christmas, the Independent newspaper launched the project “Aiuta i bambini affamati”. The discussion is not about African children, but ordinary English children. Often all the food they get during the day comes from free meals in schools and kits provided by charities. An Independent journalist bitterly recalled Dickens after visiting one of the food banks:

“Unlike Oliver Twist, the children we met at the food bank didn't ask “moreover!”. They seemed happy to at least receive something.”

The author's opinion may not coincide with the position of the editorial staff.

Read More

Share

Publisher challenges Trump, Wolff's book comes out today – Billionaire sponsor Bannon disavows it

Image results for 'Fire and Fury'After the revelations contained in 'Fire and Fury’

It will be released today “Fire and Fury: inside the Trump White House”, the book that is embarrassing Trump and his family. Defying the warning from the president's lawyers, the publisher Henry Holt decided to bring forward the distribution, initially scheduled for 9 January.
The motivation is linked to one “unprecedented question”, as Amazon also confirms, where it is the most requested book. Meanwhile, former White House strategist Steve Bannon, whose statements are an integral part of the book, loses the support of conservative billionaire Rebekah Mercer, its main financier. “I'm with Trump”, let WP know.
CONTINUE ON:
http://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/mondo/2018/01/05/miliardaria-sponsor-bannon-lo-sconfessa_1269f429-f7a0-417a-982c-a3da0e898f7e.html Read More

Share

Desperate S.O.S. to the New Church!

Of Danilo Quinto
To you all, members of the New Church. Your conscience will surely be tormented these days by a gigantic problem that newspapers report on their front pages and televisions show in their headlines.. It's not about the 5 millions of Italians in absolute poverty or of the nuclear war that could break out at any moment due to a madman in command of a country who presses a button or of the invasion of Muslims for which you so meritoriously and honestly do your utmost, to prevent that because of the 6 millions of abortions in 40 years, of insufficient birth rates and the destruction of the family, the Italian population disappears.

The problem is represented by aunt from Italy, as she defined herself. Due to the authenticated signatures to be collected for the next elections and the candidates to be transcribed on the lists to begin the collection, Emma Bonino and her list + Europe – a name that says it all – threatens to present itself, with the risk of not succeeding in the undertaking and not allying with the Democratic Party, as it seems he would like. Read More

Share

Israele e Usa uniti contro l'Iran da un accordo strategico politico-militare

Of Giacomo Colonna
Israel and the USA united against Iran by a strategic political-military agreement
Source: Clarissa
The process of destabilization of the Middle East continues at forced stages. After US President Trump's explosive statement on Jerusalem the 6 December, which brought tension, clashes and victims to Palestine, Channel 10 announced that last 12 December an agreement would be signed in Washington at the level of the highest US and Israeli national security officials, formally aimed at countering the development of Iran's nuclear program.
The agreement would have been formalized by the US National Security Council (NSC, body responsible for developing American political-military strategy) in the form of an informal framework document, in line with what was stated last 13 October by President Trump regarding his administration's desire not to reconfirm North American membership of the agreement reached in 2015 at an international level on the Iranian nuclear program. Read More

Share

Trump, la religione musulmana e l'Islam politico

Of Thierry Meyssan
Trump, the Muslim religion and political Islam
Source: Voltairnet
For about ten years now, the United States is a prisoner of its contradiction in the face of Islam. On the one hand, they think of themselves as the land of religious freedom, on the other, they use the Muslim Brotherhood to destabilize the wider Middle East, and on the other hand they are fighting against the spillover of Islamic terrorism outside this region. They have banned any research that would distinguish Islam as a religion from its manipulation for political purposes. After breaking with the terrorism of the Muslim Brotherhood, Donald Trump has decided to reopen this dossier, risking causing violence in his own country. Because in the United States the freedom to practice Islam does not imply the freedom to enter politics.
OPENING ILLUSTRATION: When Donald Trump declares: “I think Islam hates us”, refers to the Muslim religion or political ideology of the same name?
DAMASCUS (Syria) – In its new National Security Strategy, President Trump changes official terminology and refers to Muslim armed groups as “jihadist terrorists “. L’Islam: religion or ideology?
After the September 11 attacks attributed to Al Qa'ida, a violent controversy had shaken Washington: the terrorist groups were representative of Islam or not? If they were, it was agreed that all Muslims should be considered enemies of the homeland. Otherwise, a distinction could be made between Muslims “moderate” ed “extremists”.
However, the British used these same terms with another meaning: i “moderate” they are Muslims “moderately anti-imperialist”, come Hamas, which does not raise any political objections towards Israel, but he only rejects that Muslims are governed by Jews; while the “extremists” they are Muslims “extremely anti-imperialist”, come Hezbollah, which calls into question the victory of the Israeli colonial state over the Arabs.
The controversy culminated in a June conference 2006 del New York Metro InfraGard. An FBI agent and expert, William Gawthrop, he assured that it is useless to distinguish the different Muslim terrorist groups, when everyone is based on the same ideology, l’Islam. Five internal FBI documents were later leaked [1]. Intended for the training of their officers, they establish that the more you are “Islamic”, the more potentially you are “radicals”, and that the Prophet Muhammad was the leader of a violent sect. Gawthrop was based on an indisputable study of the Quran, of the Hadith and the main theological texts. He demonstrated that throughout history, theologians of the four main Sunni schools supported the war against the infidels, but not the thinkers of the Shiite school. Gawthrop was also an instructor with the Department of Defense Counterintelligence. There he had pushed to study Muhammad as a military leader.
In the 1953, President Eisenhower received a Muslim Brotherhood delegation led by Said Ramadan. The United States now supports political Islam abroad.
This controversy was not new. On the one hand, starting from 1953 and by President Eisenhower's reception of Said Ramadan, the CIA and the Department of Defense have worked abroad with supporters of political Islam, the Muslim Brotherhood. On the other side, during racial segregation, it was granted that the descendants of slaves could be Muslims, but not that they made a political claim out of it. In the 1965, the black, Muslim political leader Malcolm X was assassinated, probably with the passive help of the FBI. While he was dying on the ground, he tried to give to his secretary, shortly before dying, a message for Saïd Ramadan.
In retaliation to this point of view, a prominent American Muslim figure, Salam Al-Marayati, threatened to appeal for all cooperation with the FBI to cease [2].
Immediately, Assistant Attorney General James Cole made all of these documents inaccessible, not just at the FBI, but in all jurisdictions.
Except that the FBI documents were designed for courses in which the instructors specified at length that they did not deal with Islam as a religion, but as a political ideology [3].
The United States: country of religious freedom or Islamophobia?
It was around this time that the State Department created several structures to influence U.S. and foreign public opinion, so that the United States would not be accused of waging a war against the Muslim religion. Questo dispositivo comprendeva in particolare una cellula di una ventina di persone, who spoke several languages, called to intervene under false identities in forums to guide debates.
Whatever way to deal with the issue, the United States always returned to the same problem: already in the seventh century, the word “Islam” it is used in Arabic to designate both a religion and a political ideology, yet perfectly distinct.
In the end, in January 2008, the Department of Homeland Security issued, on the initiative of Secretary Michael Chertoff, Terminology to define terrorists (Terminology to Define the Terrorists: Recommendations from American Muslims). Then, in March 2008, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (then led by Mike McConnell) drafted a semantic note addressed to the entire administration. These instructions were aimed at cleaning up the Bush administration – that in 2001 he spoke of a "crusade against Al Qaeda" – from any suspicion of Islamophobia and to restore the honor of the "country of religious freedom".
Bringing Barack Hussein Obama to the White House was supposed to be enough to solve the problem. But it didn't happen that way, not least because, while a third of his voters thought he was Muslim, he specified that he was a Christian from a Muslim family; il che sembrava convalidare il modello di identità degli immigrati provenienti dal Nord Europa: one can be an American by being culturally and even religiously Muslim, but a president must be a Christian. Hence the violence of the campaign financed by real estate developer Donald Trump regarding Obama's birthplace (Hawaii or British Kenya?). Right, the answer affected the constitutionality of his election, ma, most importantly, it implied whether he was born a Christian or a Muslim.
Before launching the “Arab Spring”, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton packed their administrations with supporters of political Islam.
In the 2011, the Undersecretary of State for Propaganda (Public Diplomacy) created the Center for Strategic Counterterrorism Communications (Center for Strategic Counterterrorism Communications). In the 2016, this facility became known as the Global Engagement Center (Global Engagement Center) and expanded its expertise to the fight against Russia. Its budget was then multiplied by 13. The fact of entrusting the fight against terrorism and the rivalry with Russia to the same organization obviously did not help to clarify things. It was in this period that Washington adopted the expression UN “violent extremism” to designate the ideology of terrorists [4].
Let's go back: il 22 December 2012, the Egyptian magazine Rose El-Youssef revealed the presence of several Muslim Brotherhood leaders within the Obama administration, including Salam Al-Marayati. In particular, he represented Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and chaired the official US delegation to the OSCE Human Rights Conference. His wife, There, she was close to Hillary Clinton when she was first lady and served on the Commission on International Religious Freedom. Al-Marayati's intervention against Gawthrop, six years earlier, it was actually just a ploy by the Clintons, that they had used the Muslim Brotherhood to change the minds of the FBI and the Department of Defense.
The right to reflect
The controversy flared up in July 2017 with the presentation of an amendment to the law on military planning (NDAA) which authorizes the Department of Defense to study «the use of violent or unorthodox Muslim religious doctrines to support and justify the communication of extremists or terrorists» The text was rejected for 217 votes a 208, always in the name of protecting Islam as a religion.
President Trump has finally decided to apply the word “jihadist” to Muslim terrorists, although originally jihad was not the armed struggle against infidels, but rather an introspection and an examination of personal conscience.
Until now, le decisioni di Donald Trump sono state oggetto dei peggiori fraintendimenti. His decree suspending immigration from countries where consular delegations did not have the means to verify the honesty of candidates was interpreted as “Islamophobic” because these countries have a Muslim majority population.
His decision is a true intellectual revolution for the United States. Until now, the Department of Defense applied Admiral Arthur Cebrowski's strategy, destroying – country after country – every form of political organization in the wider Middle East, while the State Department ensured that this policy was not anti-Muslim in itself.
However, from a Middle Eastern point of view, this is not what was perceived. Because for fifteen years the United States has implemented Cebrowski's strategy [5] only in the predominantly Muslim part of the world, it was impossible for the Afghans, the Persians, the Turks and the Arabs, understand anything about US slogans. Indeed, it is this contradiction that Barack Obama faced during his speech in Cairo, in June 2009.
If you perfectly understand the objectives of US propaganda, one can only observe that they were its first victim. Effectively, the contradiction between their sweetening rhetoric and their support for the Muslim Brotherhood abroad (and not their strategy of destroying the wider Middle East) led them to ban any research on the origins of political Islam, both at home and among their allies.
However, Muhammad was a general and a ruler. This particular historical situation has allowed, since the early days of Islam, to a current of thought to try to manipulate this religion to seize power. Most Muslims were raised with Hadith, composed long after the death of the Prophet, who attribute to him military successes and particular political thought. The current Muslim Brotherhood rests on a long history of significant precedents.
In the 1965, the leader of US political Islam was assassinated with the probable help of the FBI.
For the rest, the United States will not be able to distinguish the two meanings of the word “Islam” until they have resolved the question of their identity. Donald Trump and his voters easily accept that Blacks and Hispanics are citizens of the United States, but it is unlikely that they exercise leading political functions.
Paradoxically, while it would be appropriate for Muslim intellectuals to undertake this research and thus allow their religion to be separated from its political manipulation, the United States will probably conduct this exploration alone. Even though there is a large number of Muslim researchers in the USA, it is unlikely that this country will not project its own cultural problems onto this subject of study at the risk of misinterpreting it.
NOTE
[1] The reader will find here the main documents cited in this article.
[2] “The wrong way to fight terrorism”, Salam Al-Marayati, Los Angeles Times, October 19, 2011.
[3] This video of a course held at Quantico leaves no doubt about this topic.
[4] “Action plan for the prevention of violent extremism”, by Ban Ki-moon, Voltaire Network, 24 December 2015.
[5] The Pentagon’s New Map, Thomas P. M. Barnett, Putnam Publishing Group, 2004. «The United States and its global military project», at Thierry Meyssan, Haiti Liberty (Haiti), Rete Voltaire, 24 August 2017.
Translation by Matzu Yagi.

Read More

Share

Elections, banks and the Vatican, Bisignani speaks: here's how it will end

Image results for felts and the popeIn addition to Bisignani, Feltri also lashed out at Bergoglio in yesterday's Libero, saying that he only likes him when he is silent, that is, never. We note that from the main anti-progressive circles, or at least not progressive, voices are raised, also prominent, very critical of the one who comes, now considered the leader of the world left, ecologist, pacifist, pauperist, ecumenist, globalist. and him, according to many, he would be increasingly alone, not just to “Angelus”…
Of Gian Marco Chiocci for Il Tempo del 30/12/2017
Listen to Bisignani, there isn't a person who doesn't ask about you when they meet me, of his relationships, of its secrets, how he has always known things in advance for thirty years now. He can answer once and for all (Please do it in a concise way as we have so many things to ask you)?
«As a journalist I experienced major news events first-hand: from the Friuli earthquake, to the Circeo crime, until the Moro case. As a communications man I have met characters who have made history, from Andreotti to Cossiga, from Pope Wojtyla to Cardinal Casaroli, from Agostino Rocca to Raul Gardini. And then there are also legal matters that concerned me. So I've seen all the colors. Andreotti said that l’ experience is the sum of the rip-offs suffered. Having been through a lot myself, I know well how many stories end, for better or worse…
IF YOU WANT TO CONTINUE READING CLICK HERE Read More

Share

Mussolini, il personaggio dell'anno 2017

Of Marcello Veneziani

http://www.marcelloveneziani.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Untitled-design-1.jpg

The character of the current and dying year 2017 he's bald, strong jaw, born in Romagna, married with several children and a few lovers, journalist profession, dictator vocation, but a particular double sign dominates all the others: ha 134 years, and has died since 72 years. Even the copyrights have expired. If you don't have it yet [&hellip

CONTINUE ON:
http://www.marcelloveneziani.com/articoli/mussolini-personaggio-dellanno/ Read More

Share
1 25 26 27 28