by Francesco Rossini
We have already written that Brexit cannot be understood except in the light of Great Britain's traditionally and historically Russophobic foreign policy. The nations or empires that engage in "big politics" have always modulated small internal affairs based on foreign policy. It is foreign policy that decides the political quality of a regime or a state. In England there are two or three or four parties but there is and has always existed only one foreign policy. Il New British Empire, Global Britain, theorized by 2014 stands out for its counteraction against Eurasia and for the anti-Russian offensive. It is the historical idea of British imperial recovery after the "financial Dunkirk" (cit. Keynes 1945) and the catastrophe of the Second World War with Britain in economic bankruptcy and the birth of Israel, which Churchill and Eden tried in vain to prevent by every means.
The first structural level of the New British Empire makes use of the transnational link of Anglo-American capital, with London and New York as nerve centers and Brussels and Geneva as replacement centers. This structural level envisaged the piloted Italian default and the Troika in Rome, as Soros – the British agent – has attempted to impose on Draghi and Juncker in recent months. Italy would return Cologne Italy of London , as it was approximately until the Matteotti Crime (1924). As the protagonists of Britannia want (1992). In this regard, Mentana's dry denials regarding the presence of B still appear unconvincing. Grillo on the yacht on that fateful day, in light of the behavior of the "left" of the Five Star Movement which responds precisely to the Genoese comedian. Washington is a top-level political center and the geopolitical Commonwealth. The Russian resistance in the face of hybrid political-military and economic warfare aggression (2014-2015), with Vladimir Putin's new anti-British Mediterranean protagonism, on whose trial both tsarism and the Soviet Union ended up falling, It therefore gives central importance to China.
The second structure of the NIB is in fact based on the tactics of the Chinese Commonwealth with Hong Kong at the heart of the Chinese Anglophile party and the new globalist plutocratic imperialism. But Trump's victory, Christian and anti-British American patriot, it also ruined this project based on Anglo-Chinese and especially anti-Russian globalism, supported instead by the losing imperialist Obama-Clinton line.
To the internal conflict between American “nationalists” and globalists (the party in London and Hong Kong), one could tragically add a Sino-American escalation based on control of Taiwan. The British and American services organized the international anti-Chinese campaign of 2008, before the Olympics, how they organized the anti-Russian one of 1980, on the occasion of the Moscow Olympics. This anti-Chinese subversive action started from Tibet, as you will remember, other hot and potentially flammable region. Trump's attempt to reach an economic-commercial agreement with Beijing is an enlightened diplomatic tool to prevent the tragic escalation. As analyst Niall Ferguson rightly wrote, British and American civil societies are those at greatest risk of ethnic and civil wars, it would be a matter of years, and the Trumpian line is the only one that has taken this problem seriously and tries to eliminate it.
In conclusion. September 11th 2001 it was the crucial moment of the current global ideological conflict. The Anglo-Saxon globalist and neo-imperialist super-Masonic elite have begun the century in their own way. What we see is a continuation of the same unorthodox war, fought on the skin of peoples used as cannon fodder. The only concrete barrier to the imperialist and globalist war party is represented by the Moscow Patriarchate (Kirill has repeatedly denounced this project) and from Russian-led Eurasia. For this reason, the structure that brings together all the various global fractions evolves and becomes radicalized, apart from Xi's Chinese party, enlightened statesman but unfortunately little loved by the Chinese Anglophile elite. The operational structure aimed precisely at the practice of the "Colored Revolution" against Moscow. Ukrainian white supremacists or ISIS terrorists would both fit the bill.
The first structural level of the New British Empire makes use of the transnational link of Anglo-American capital, with London and New York as nerve centers and Brussels and Geneva as replacement centers. This structural level envisaged the piloted Italian default and the Troika in Rome, as Soros – the British agent – has attempted to impose on Draghi and Juncker in recent months. Italy would return Cologne Italy of London , as it was approximately until the Matteotti Crime (1924). As the protagonists of Britannia want (1992). In this regard, Mentana's dry denials regarding the presence of B still appear unconvincing. Grillo on the yacht on that fateful day, in light of the behavior of the "left" of the Five Star Movement which responds precisely to the Genoese comedian. Washington is a top-level political center and the geopolitical Commonwealth. The Russian resistance in the face of hybrid political-military and economic warfare aggression (2014-2015), with Vladimir Putin's new anti-British Mediterranean protagonism, on whose trial both tsarism and the Soviet Union ended up falling, It therefore gives central importance to China.
The second structure of the NIB is in fact based on the tactics of the Chinese Commonwealth with Hong Kong at the heart of the Chinese Anglophile party and the new globalist plutocratic imperialism. But Trump's victory, Christian and anti-British American patriot, it also ruined this project based on Anglo-Chinese and especially anti-Russian globalism, supported instead by the losing imperialist Obama-Clinton line.
To the internal conflict between American “nationalists” and globalists (the party in London and Hong Kong), one could tragically add a Sino-American escalation based on control of Taiwan. The British and American services organized the international anti-Chinese campaign of 2008, before the Olympics, how they organized the anti-Russian one of 1980, on the occasion of the Moscow Olympics. This anti-Chinese subversive action started from Tibet, as you will remember, other hot and potentially flammable region. Trump's attempt to reach an economic-commercial agreement with Beijing is an enlightened diplomatic tool to prevent the tragic escalation. As analyst Niall Ferguson rightly wrote, British and American civil societies are those at greatest risk of ethnic and civil wars, it would be a matter of years, and the Trumpian line is the only one that has taken this problem seriously and tries to eliminate it.
In conclusion. September 11th 2001 it was the crucial moment of the current global ideological conflict. The Anglo-Saxon globalist and neo-imperialist super-Masonic elite have begun the century in their own way. What we see is a continuation of the same unorthodox war, fought on the skin of peoples used as cannon fodder. The only concrete barrier to the imperialist and globalist war party is represented by the Moscow Patriarchate (Kirill has repeatedly denounced this project) and from Russian-led Eurasia. For this reason, the structure that brings together all the various global fractions evolves and becomes radicalized, apart from Xi's Chinese party, enlightened statesman but unfortunately little loved by the Chinese Anglophile elite. The operational structure aimed precisely at the practice of the "Colored Revolution" against Moscow. Ukrainian white supremacists or ISIS terrorists would both fit the bill.
Thanks for the piece but hard to fully understand, he says and doesn't say to raise questions about the reader, good method but if it said everything it would be better. thanks ema