Luciani would have liked to denounce the most left wing of the Jesuits. The same ecclesiastical current, Today, she would have reached the top of the Vatican
Of Francesco Boezi
Report “the wing deviated” of the Jesuits: this would have been the intention Pope Luciani.
One of the last, according to what the professor said Francesco Agnoli on the pages of The Truth, expressed before his death.
The narrative was somehow related to the so-called “Viganò dossier”, the one in which the former apostolic nuncio of the United States accused Pope Francis that he had done nothing against Thedore McCarrick, despite knowing about his behavior and abuse. The document, However, would present some inconsistencies and the American cardinal, as readers will remember, However, it was undermined’ right from Bergoglio.
The fact is that the journalist, linking this story to some alleged revelations contained in the eleven-page memoir, he remembered how John Paul I, the last Italian pope, had expressed the desire to put a stop to the doctrinal innovations brought by the Jesuits in matters of moral doctrine. Especially those promoted by that current which played a role of thematic clearance within the Catholic Church during 1968′.
The point, also highlighted by Monsignor Viganò, this is it: many ecclesiastics belonging to that wing, which is considered ultra-progressive, during the present day, cardinals were created. Elevations occurred during the pontificate of Pope Francis. As if a certain left, In short, had gained the upper hand after the last Conclave. The first name mentioned, but, is that of Vincent O’Keefe: “A Jesuit, died on 22 July of 2012, whose history is very important for connecting past and present…”. Thedore McCarrick himself would have participated in the open-minded cultural operation promoted by it “ala deviata” in the years of youth rebellion.
Then the story of the clash with John Paul I: Pedro Arrupe, one of the most prominent exponents of the Society of Jesus of the time, he would have declared that the new Pope would be available to revisit the Church's positions on homosexuality, abortion and women's priesthood. All within an interview, the same one that would have thus provoked the irritation of the last Italian pontiff. It is even said that Luciani went so far as to hypothesize dissolution or in any case harsh measures in the event of failure to receive his dictates on the need not to modify the doctrine. John Paul I would have liked to crush the Jesuit wing through a public speech which, due to sudden death, it was never held.
Anedotti, these, which would have been told by another Jesuit, padre Malachi Martin. Vincent O'Keefe and Theodore McCarrick, going back to a previous step, they would have shared “friendship” e “ideal battles”. Other ecclesiastics also became cardinals “under” Bergoglio would be comparable to the ultra-progressive current: Farrell, Tobin e Cupich. James Martin himself, the Jesuit “pro Lgbt” became a consultant to the Vatican on communications matters, would be part of this whole.
The summary of the theses supported in the article is this: left-wing clergy, belonging to or close to the most reformist faction of the Jesuits, the same ones that Luciani would have wanted “stop”, have taken over over the last five and a half years
Source: http://www.ilgiornale.it/news/cronache/rivelazione-su-papa-luciani-voleva-denunciare-i-gesuiti-1571917.html
o, poor things ! …while the rest of the popes were saints as defined by Bergoglio , drink it. Same procedure for the sanctification of De Gasperi who was nothing other than a usurper of power to infiltrate rabbits and foxes into post-war governments. Not only that, but Guareschi's documentation also reports something else against the “gentleman” to whom the Trentino people pay honors and a statue in the city of Trento…
Pope Luciani had been suffering from a heart condition for some time and had not wanted to reveal it ,who knows why, perhaps to become pope. The fact is that papal commitments require excellent health and he had none at all. The rest are hypotheses that I consider fanciful.
I think there's a lot of imaginativeness in this too.
This story will perhaps be useful in making people believe that Luciani was the real pope. It fits perfectly, the conciliar church needs clean faces to show .
E’ some news. To be taken as such. Then we have the impression that we will never know whether it is imaginative or not.
In the liberal-Masonic world, knowing things as they are is blasphemy .
On the other hand, liberalism is a way of worshiping Lucifer.