Carlo Freccero: Foa, finally a Rai President out of the frame

Carlo Freccero: Foa, finally a Rai President out of the frameby Carlo Freccero

Foa is part of a small group of opinion leaders, blogger, journalists and thinkers, who present the other side of the coin on the internet, the facts beyond the propaganda

I wrote some time ago on these pages that the order of speech it's changing. Foa's proposal to president of Rai is a confirmation of my statement. I'll say more. If the nomination is followed by the proposal, there is a good chance that this process would be accelerated, because information is fundamental for the formation of public opinion. The proof? The hysterical reaction with which his candidacy was received by the entire mainstream press. The Movement 5 Stelle suggested Salini and no one had anything to object to. The League proposed Foa and the uproar broke out. It is paradoxical that Foa is being fought as a fake news dealer. In this area Foa is a precursor, but in reverse.

It's from 2006, a year that in terms of the fight against fake news is prehistoric, that Foa analyzes the problem of truth in politics. His book The sorcerers of the news, of which among other things the update has been released, critically analyzes the phenomenon of spin doctors and its implications in terms of democracy. The figure of the spin doctor is not a figment of the imagination of conspiracy theorists, but an official figure, well paid, which has long been involved in organizing the electoral campaigns of Democratic and Republican candidates in America and which, more recently, it was also introduced in Italy. I remember the spin doctor who followed the Monti government and the complete Americanization of the Renzian electoral campaign. The spin doctor is not bound by the truth. Read More

Share

We really should defend Israel as a “bulwark of the West”?

western Israel
 
 
THIS IS WHY’ EUROPE HAS NO ROOTS “JUDEO-CHRISTIAN” BUT ONLY CHRISTIAN ROOTS AND TRADITION
Of Adriano Scianca
Israel? It is the "bulwark of the West". How many times have we read it, even these days, especially on the right, even among the visitors of this site. They are therefore defending “the West”, Israeli soldiers shooting at Palestinians? E, above all, they are defending us too? It's important to ask yourself this, because if the Jewish State has always divided public opinion on the basis of often pre-political criteria and if the objections raised against it are often of a moral nature, then they exist, more coldly, of the political categories that should be drawn upon to bring the issue back to less slippery terrain.
Ora, that Europeans use the category of the West to define themselves is in itself rather paradoxical if one only considers that the very concept of the West was explicitly created in an anti-European key. In practice, Europeans today claim with passionate fervor belonging to a community of values ​​that was created precisely to exclude them and which has partly accepted them within itself, as vassals, except that they were defeated in a world war. For their part, Americans famously began to conceive of themselves as the West not to incorporate Europe into a broader Atlantic context, but to underline the firm break with everything that the Old Continent represented. It was President Thomas Jefferson who stated that America represents a "separate hemisphere", evoking a meridian - more moral than geographical - to separate the land where "the lamb and the lion will live in peace with each other" from corrupt Europe and its vices. In reality he was merely repeating Washington's teachings, that in 1793 he had already declared: “I am sure that the will of the United States is to have nothing to do with the intrigues and political disputes of the European nations”. President Monroe expressed the same concept when enunciating his famous theory aimed at excluding any European intervention in the New Continent (essentially “America for the Americans”). In fact, the meridian evoked by Jefferson was supposed to separate Good and Evil, the kingdom of equality and freedom from the land of hierarchy and oppression. Ora, mind you America believed it could embody this rejection of Europe by electing itself the Promised Land, that is, the New Israel based on membership (OR BETTER, AMERICANIST INTERPRETATION OF THE BIBLICAL STATEMENT, N.D.R.) as stringent as possible with the biblical dictate. Read More

Share

Gli USA contro l'Iran: a choice of field that reveals their arrogance

Of Pietro Batacchi
The USA against Iran: a choice of field that reveals their arrogance
Source: Italian Defense Magazine

All that was missing was the official status, which arrived yesterday at 20:00 Italian time. President Trump has decided to withdraw America from the Treaty with Iran on the nuclear program and to reintroduce it, we will see how later, the sanctions regime. An important decision, which follows what was promised in the election campaign, which makes the Administration hawks happy, e, above all, Israelis and Saudis, who had been pressuring Trump for months to make him withdraw from the agreement, but which dissatisfied the European allies, starting with Italy. A decision, Then, which raises the big question of America's credibility with respect to the maintenance of signed commitments and which could have significant repercussions in the future and in other geopolitical arenas. But let's go step by step. This Administration has made a precise choice of field.
It sided with the Saudis and Israelis – now practically allies – to stop the growth of Iranian influence in the Middle East which occurred through the Syrian civil war, ma, before that, let's not forget it, as a result of the removal of Saddam and the disintegration of Sunni Iraq desired by the Americans themselves in 2003. Exiting the agreement, therefore, it could signal the American intention to move from the passive containment phase of Iran to the active containment phase, Perhaps, in "roll back", or recovery of “portions” of influence within the perimeter “Persian” progressively expanded by Tehran in recent years with a pragmatic indirect strategy. For sure, Trump's decision strengthens the radical faction of the Iranian regime, which has been pressing the Supreme Leader for months to react to the continuous Israeli attacks in Syria, to the detriment of the reformist component, grappling with a serious internal economic crisis that the new sanctions would only exacerbate. And then there are the consequences for transatlantic relations. After the climate agreements, tensions over duties and trade policies, the USA once again radically distances itself from Europe which, in this case, marches in unison stating that it wants to continue to respect the agreement with Iran and claiming its functioning and benefits. A clear difference in views which demonstrates how the United States is willing to let the transatlantic relationship slide into the background when interests considered to be of primary importance are at stake, and exclusive, relevance. After all, Trump's new National Security Strategy was clear on this, as well as in underlining the change in the international scenario towards a new era of competition between powers. Right, the powers “hostile” are identified in the document with China and Russia, but reading between the lines you can also see a veiled reference to Europe – in terms of economic-industrial competition – with respect to which the USA has lost its traditional instrument of influence/interference as a result of Brexit, read the UK. The battle over the sale of the F-35 to Germany, fought openly even in the last ILA show in Berlin, it's there to prove it. In the end, no less important, the plan of consequences for Italy. Rome and Tehran are linked by solid commercial relations, never interrupted even in the darkest years of Khomeinism, and that with the partial removal of the sanctions regime they had blossomed again, in different sectors: from the energy one, to that of infrastructure. Trump's decision affects them again.

Read More

Share

I know which country will be next to be invaded by the United States

Of Lee Camp
I know which country will be next to be invaded by the United States
Source: Comedonchisciotte
At the end of this article, it will be clear which nation will be next to be invaded and devastated by the United States. O, in the absence of this, what will be the next nation that our military and intelligence industrial complex will try to invade at all costs.
We would all like to know why America does what it does. And I don't mean why Americans do what we do. I think this question could be asked, in many centuries, some future professor, as he shows his students a telepathic video of some current UFC fight [Ultimate Fighting Championship – mixed martial arts] where the contestants kick each other in the face in front of a cheering crowd (not for one or the other of the two combatants, but rather for (view) more kicks in the face).
But we all seem to take America for granted, understood as an entity and as a corporation, has some kind of higher motivation for his behaviors, for the actions carried out by its ruling class. But, in practice, Most of us realize that the reasons fed to us by press officers and ridiculous evening news anchors are the most rotten, smelliest bullshit there could be.. Read More

Share

Peru, massacre of 140 children: the greatest mass sacrifice/ Chimu Empire: “È stata un'uccisione rituale”

Remains of the Chimu civilizationReporting of Stefano F.
The remains of 140 children killed as human sacrifice by tearing out their hearts, the largest human sacrifice of children in history
Of Paolo Vites

Evidence of the largest mass child sacrifice ever committed in the Americas has been discovered on the northern coast of Peru, and perhaps throughout the history of the world. Beyond 140 children and 200 llama would have been killed approx 550 years ago as part of a ritual sacrifice. The research was carried out by an international and interdisciplinary group led by Gabriel Prieto of the Universidad Nacional de Trujillo and John Verano of Tulane University. «I never expected it. And I think it's the same for other colleagues too", the comment to National Geographic by the physical anthropologist Verano who worked for over three decades in this region. The site of the sacrifice is known as Huanchaquito-Las Llamas. Here in the 2011 remains of were found 42 children and 76 lama. At the end of the research, finished in 2016, the number rose to 140 children and 200 lama. “It was a ritual killing and it was systematic”, says Verano. «Explaining the sacrifice of children is decidedly more difficult», dice invece Joseph Watts, postdoctoral researcher at the University of Oxford and the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. This is because most societies that practiced human sacrifice nevertheless practiced it on adults. (agg. by Silvana Palazzo) Read More

Share

How China is taking over the world

Reporting of BastaBugie editorial team

Furthermore, in the religious field, Xi Jinping promotes the creator of the campaign that led to the removal of 1.500 crosses and the demolition of many Christian churches
and Laogai Research Foundation

(AUTOMATIC READING)
The Chinese trade balance is abundantly in surplus with all the main industrialized countries. Virtually everyone finds themselves importing much more from China than they are able to export.
This process allows China to achieve steady GDP growth (approximately of 7% anno), therefore achieving the objective set by Beijing. Basically every year, a river of money moves from the West to China. With this money Beijing is buying companies, technology and “know how” from all over the world, it is transforming into a formidable economic and military power capable of influencing world balances and redefining its rules and principles.
In the 2017 China's overall trade surplus was $ 422,5 billion.
China's surplus to the United States in 2017 was equal to $ 275,81 billion (finanza.com).
China's surplus towards Europe in 2017 was equal to € 175 billion (ilgiornale.it).
China's surplus towards Italy in 2016 was equal to € 16,18 billion (infomercatiesteri.com).
These incredible numbers explain the reasons for China's power and difficulties, often disastrous, on the western side. But given that the Chinese have not proven to be leaders in any sector related to innovation, science or technology, so let's try to understand what were the causes that led to this new reality. Read More

Share