Of Lee Camp

Source: Comedonchisciotte
At the end of this article, it will be clear which nation will be next to be invaded and devastated by the United States. O, in the absence of this, what will be the next nation that our military and intelligence industrial complex will try to invade at all costs.
We would all like to know why America does what it does. And I don't mean why Americans do what we do. I think this question could be asked, in many centuries, some future professor, as he shows his students a telepathic video of some current UFC fight [Ultimate Fighting Championship – mixed martial arts] where the contestants kick each other in the face in front of a cheering crowd (not for one or the other of the two combatants, but rather for (view) more kicks in the face).
But we all seem to take America for granted, understood as an entity and as a corporation, has some kind of higher motivation for his behaviors, for the actions carried out by its ruling class. But, in practice, Most of us realize that the reasons fed to us by press officers and ridiculous evening news anchors are the most rotten, smelliest bullshit there could be..
We know that the invasion of Iraq had nothing to do with weapons of mass destruction. We now know that the destruction of Libya was not to “stop a bad man” at all. Even if you take a quick look at what dictators around the world have done so far, it will turn out that the United States does not care at all whether they are good or bad, that they use their free time to kill thousands of innocents or to garden. In fact, the United States grants military aid al 70% of dictators around the world. (Hopefully only during the holidays though).
At that time, if it is not for the reasons given to us, because the United States , they invade, they destroy and sometimes occupy some nations? It is clear that underneath there must be oil resources or deposits of rare minerals. But there is something else that connects all our recent wars.
As the Guardian reported, just before the start of the war in Iraq, “in October of 2000, Iraq had insisted on abandoning the US dollar, the enemy's currency, for the much more flexible euro.”
Anyway, an example does not make a trend. If so, I would be a famous beer pong world champion [1], while I have a personal best of 1-27 (numbers that certainly don't make me count myself in the professional category).
But there's more. As Libya began to take the first steps towards a gold-based African currency, convincing all her African neighbors to adopt her, we invaded her too, with the help of NATO. Author Ellen Brown had pointed this out at the time of the invasion:
[Gaddafi] had started a movement to reject the dollar and the euro and had appealed to Arab and African nations to use, in their place, the new currency, the gold dinar.
Anche John Perkins, l’autore di “Confessions of an Economic Hitman”, claimed that the real reason for the attack on Libya was Gaddafi's distancing from the dollar and the euro.
This week, The Intercept he reported reported that Gaddafi's ouster, desired above all by the French President Nicolas Sarkozy, And, in practice, to be linked to the fact that Sarcozy had secretly received several million from Gaddafi and his corruption was about to become public knowledge. But the article also notes that “real military zeal [of Sarcozy] and his desire for regime change had manifested themselves only after that [Hillary] Clinton and the Arab League had expressed their desire to see him ousted [Gaddafi]."The fact that Gaddafi planned to eliminate the use of the petrodollar in Africa certainly provided the necessary motivation. (It doesn't take much to excite the United States to embark on a new bombing campaign.
I'm pretty sure we invaded Madagascar once, in the 70s, just because they smoked good stuff down there).
You may be thinking right now, “ Ma, Lee, your theory is ridiculous. If these invasions all affected banking activity, then the Libyan rebels, aided by NATO and the United States, after overthrowing Gaddafi they would had to immediately establish a new banking system.”
In practice, they hadn't waited that long. In the midst of that brutal war, the Libyan rebels had created their own central bank.
Brown said: “Several authors have noticed a strange fact, that the Libyan rebels had time, during the revolt, to create a central bank, even before having a government (real)”.
Woh, said like this, it seems that everything revolves around the banking system.
Many of you are familiar with General Wesley Clark's famous quote about the seven nations (to invade) in five years. Clark is a four-star general, he was head of NATO's Supreme Allied Command and participated in the presidential elections of 2008 (clearly, could do better). But it's quite likely that, from 100 years, the only thing he will be remembered for is for letting us know what the Pentagon told him in 2002: “We will take down seven nations in five years. We will start with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, then Libya, with Somalia, he Sudan. We'll go back and do Iran in five years."
Most of these things occurred. We have, naturally, added some nations to the list, come lo Yemen. We are helping to destroy Yemen above all to make Saudi Arabia happy. It seems that our government and our media only care about Syrian children (to justify regime change). We couldn't care less about Yemeni children, Iraqis, Afghans, Palestinians, North Koreans, somali, of Flint (Michigan), of Baltimore, of Native American children, puerto ricani o Na’vi…. one moment, I think these are from “Avatar.” It wasn't a movie? I'm starting to confuse my memories with 3D movies.
Brown goes even further in her analysis of Clarke's revelations:
What do these seven nations have in common?… None of them are on the list of 56 member del BIS ( Bank for International Settlements). This evidently keeps them safe from the regulatory powers of the bankers of the Swiss central bank. The most treacherous of the whole group may have been Libya and Iraq, the two nations that were actually attacked.
What I'm trying to say is: everything revolves around the banking system.
Now you must be thinking: “Ma, Lee, At that time, why the US is so eager to turn Syria into a failed state, if Syria never abandoned the dollar? Your whole stupid theory falls apart right here.”
First things first, I don't like your tone. Second, in February 2006, Syria has stopped using the dollar as its primary hard currency.
I think I see a certain trend. Indeed, has been reported, il 4 January, that Pakistan was abandoning the dollar in trade with China and, on the same day, the United States has blacklisted him for violations of freedom of religion. Same day? Should we really believe that Pakistan stopped trading in dollars with China on the same day it started punching Christians in the nose, without even a good reason? No, clearly Pakistan has violated our cold hard currency religion.
All of this leaves us with just one question: who will be next on the American invasion list, illegal but cloaked in bogus justifications? Beh, last week Iran finally did so: changed from the dollar to the euro. E, Obviously, this week the military-industrial complex, the corporate media and Israel, they all came together to say that Iran is lying about its nuclear weapons program. What are the chances that such news could be given only a few days after Iran abandoned the dollar? How many possibilities are there??
The beautiful thing about the consensus factory of our corporate state is how predictable it is. We see how the mainstream media publishes more and more articles, who push everyone on the fact that Iran is a sponsor of terrorism and is trying to develop nuclear weapons (which is a weapon of mass destruction, WMD, ma, for some strange reason, our media is reluctant to say “they have WMD”). Here is an article from 2017 of PSB where it is stated that Iran is the state that, more than all the others, sponsors terrorism.
We must therefore think that the list of sponsors of terrorism does not include the nation that produced the weapons that significantly improved the military capabilities of the Islamic State. (It's the United States).
Or the nation that dropped hundreds of bombs a day in the Middle East. (It's the United States). But those bombs cause no terror. Those are clearly happy bombs. Looks like we just got off the hook 1995 Richard Simmons [American comedian] on unsuspecting people.
The point is, as we watch our pathetic corporate media continue preparing consensus for war with Iran, let's not fall for it. All these wars are for the banks. And millions of people die there. Millions more have their lives destroyed.
You and I are just pawns in this game, ma, the last thing the elites want, they are pawns who question the official narrative.
 
*Lee Camp is an American comedian, writer, actor and activist. Considered by Salon “the John Oliver of Russia Today”, Camp is the host of RT of America's first comedy news show “Renacted Tonight”, which tackles the wedding lineup with a healthy dose of satire and humor. Lee's journalistic experience is extensive, having written for The Onion, Comedy Central e The Huffington Post, including a collection of best-selling essays, come Moments of Clarity e Neither Sophisticated Nor Intelligent. His stand-up comedy shows have also been performed on Comedy Central, ABC’s Good Morning America, Showtime’s The Green Room con Paul Provenza, Al-Jazeera, BBC’s Newsnight, E!, MTV, e Spike TV.
Source: www.informationclearinghouse.info
Link: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/49359.htm
Selected and translated for www.comedonchisciotte.org da MARKUS
[1] a drinking contest in which players try to throw ping-pong balls into mugs of beer; the loser must drink the contents of the mug into which the ball enters.