Actuality | Science and Bioethics

Matthew Castagna, friend of Minister Fontana: “L'aborto è un omicidio”
by

After the interview with “The Mosquito” your Radio24 18/10/2018, And “Daily blitz” to patch up the statements of our Matteo Castagna (in fact it does not ask the questions asked by the hosts, nor that Castagna declared them live: “dirty questions”), which exclusively reiterates what the Catechism of Saint Pius X and the Social Doctrine of the Church teach

Matthew Castagna, friend of Minister Fontana: "Chi pratica l'aborto è un assassino"

Matthew Castagna, friend of Minister Fontana: “Whoever practices abortion is a murderer” (In the photo Ansa, Minister Fontana)

ROME – “Who practices abortion is a murderer. (“anyone who kills is a murderer” – real phrase said by Castagna, n.d.r.) I'm against contraception, no condoms and pills. He only enjoys himself to have children": to say it is Matthew Castagna of the traditionalist movement Christus Rex of Verona, friend of the Minister of the Family Lorenzo Fontana, so much to add: “My ideas are those of Minister Fontana, we have been friends since 23 years".

Speaking at La Zanzara, your Radio24, Castagna returned to the topic of abortion: “Whoever practices abortion is a murderer, like anyone who kills human lives. The doctor must necessarily make a conscientious objection. I would repeal the 194, right away. There would be a society educated on order and love of life. The cases of women wanting an abortion would be reduced to a minimum. I am against any form of contraception. Just as the doctrine of the Church says. We abstain. The sexual act with enjoyment is done by God only for procreation and that's it. Sex should only be had in marriage and only to procreate. Even bringing it into the world 50 children". Read More

Share
BERGOGLIADI | Catholicism

Who says capital punishment is, in itself, bad, falls into heresy
by

of the Prof. Roberto De Mattei

The lawfulness of the death penalty is a truth to be held by faith, defined by the ordinary and universal Magisterium of the Church, in a constant and unequivocal manner. Who says capital punishment is, in itself, bad, falls into heresy.

The teaching of the Church was clearly expressed in the letter of 18 December 1208, in which Innocent III condemns the Waldensian position, with these words, reported by Denzinger: «We assert a secular power, that without mortal sin he can exercise the judgment of blood, provided that I do not hate to take revenge, but by judgment, not carelessly, but let him proceed in consultation» ( A handbook of symbols,definitions and declarations on matters of faith and morals, edited by Peter Hünermann S.J., n. 795). (As for secular power, we affirm that the death penalty can be exercised without mortal sin, provided that revenge is exercised not out of hatred, but by judgment, not in an imprudent way, but in moderation).

The same position was reiterated by Catechism of the Council of Trent (Part three, n. 328), dal Catechism maggiore of Saint Pius (Part three, n. 413) and from the new Catechism of the Catholic Church (n. 2267) (albeit invalid because legislated by illegitimate authorities, n.d.r.). Pope Francis (Il “not-pope” Francesco, n.d.r.) he has now signed a rescript that modifies the Catechism (of the Conciliar Counter-Church itself, n.d.r.) with this new formulation: «The Church teaches, in the light of the Gospel, that 'the death penalty is inadmissible because it attacks the inviolability and dignity of the person', and is committed with determination to its abolition throughout the world». Read More

Share
Actuality | Science and Bioethics

Open letter by L. Hen: "Chi sono io per giudicare?"
by

Of Luciano Gallina
Open letter to:
The Gazzettino of Padua
Dr. Elisabetta Frezza Padua
PD Secretary of Padua Davide Tramarin
Councilor of the Municipality of Padua Eleonora Mosco
Jorge Mario Bergoglio House of Saint Martha
Treviso 05-06-2018
WHO AM I TO JUDGE
I am writing in reference to the two letters published by the Gazzettino on the reserved page "readers' mail". The two letters deal with the same topic but from two different points of view, the authors are: Dr. Elisabetta Frezza Padova and the PD Secretary of Padua Davide Tramarin.
Since Bergoglio pronounced the phrase: WHO AM I TO JUDGE, the same was brandished as a banner of freedom.
What does freedom mean?
What does it mean to judge?
If freedom, it means doing what you want and/or what you think is right, from this moment we close all the courts and NO ONE is allowed to judge anyone for any reason. Read More

Share