Of Luciano Gallina
Open letter to:
The Gazzettino of Padua
Dr. Elisabetta Frezza Padua
PD Secretary of Padua Davide Tramarin
Councilor of the Municipality of Padua Eleonora Mosco
Jorge Mario Bergoglio House of Saint Martha
Treviso 05-06-2018
WHO AM I TO JUDGE
I am writing in reference to the two letters published by the Gazzettino on the reserved page "readers' mail". The two letters deal with the same topic but from two different points of view, the authors are: Dr. Elisabetta Frezza Padova and the PD Secretary of Padua Davide Tramarin.
Since Bergoglio pronounced the phrase: WHO AM I TO JUDGE, the same was brandished as a banner of freedom.
What does freedom mean?
What does it mean to judge?
If freedom, it means doing what you want and/or what you think is right, from this moment we close all the courts and NO ONE is allowed to judge anyone for any reason.
Someone explain to me why communists and similar, they love the phrase so much: WHO AM I TO JUDGE? and they carry it as their flag.
There are two hypotheses that come to mind:
- At first, they converted and became Catholic?
- The second, Bergoglio is a communist? In this case we have the decree of the Holy Office dated 1 July 1949, promulgated the Latae Sententiae excommunication to communists and similar. Ergo, ipso facto Bergoglio loses the role of Pope, because an excommunicated person is separated from the body of the Church (Catechism of Saint Pius). A person who has a certain role, must follow the rules that this role entails.
Let me explain with an example: ABCD is a policeman who works during the day at the police station in the city of Onesti. At night, suffering from insomnia he moves to the city of Ladrillar to carry out thefts and robberies. Here is an example of a person with two incompatible roles. Ops, sorry I made a mistake, who am I to judge and interfere with the freedom of those who also have insomnia problems.
Dear Dr. Davide, She writes: who is Mosco to judge. Good though, at this point so as not to go against the principle of non-contradiction, we cannot judge Mosco.
Another problem Dr. Davide, the biological.
Biology is ignorant and old-fashioned and does not want to change ITS modus operandi, codified by the Eternal Father. The reference is always from what you wrote: “A child's growth can always be ensured by the love and care received from their parents regardless of their sex.” I repeat: the principle of non-contradiction has been abolished?
How can two people of the same sex be parents of the same child? Biology being retrograde and ignorant, dice: I have nothing to do with it.
Because the etymological root of parent has a different meaning, biologically and grammatically speaking.
If a guy/girl, after having done blood sugar tests he goes to the doctor with the report indicating a value of 400. How the doctor should behave? He must judge the value, or in the name of blood sugar freedom, must tell guy/girl: who am I to judge?
ATTENTION, you will be judged by biology which is intransigent and not at all democratic.
Dr. S. L. Luciano Gallina
Ah,ah,ah ! Very good doctor,Hen, he nailed the problem ! But here's the problem …having hit it squarely,by unmasking the HYPOCRITES he created the gnashing of their teeth, commanded by the prince of this world. So they will pretend they didn't receive anything !
I DON'T WANT TO SEEM TOO FLATTERY , THIS LETTER AND’ SO PRECISE, DETAILED AND EASY TO UNDERSTAND ,THAT I WILL USE IT’ ( if you allow me ) FOR MY VARIOUS INTERVENTIONS IN DEBATE AND DISCUSSIONS . THANK YOU AND KIND GREETINGS .
I can only applaud the coherence of Dr.'s presentation. Hen. I would like to be able to attend one of his debates with any Bergoglian or Tramarin on duty. But I think people from that series would hardly accept a comparison. All my respect Dr. Hen, You are a consistent person among many Catholic intellectuals, most of them – despite knowing the truth – they remain silent or worse yet they support the unsustainable by trying to square the circle Ratzinger model evolution bergoglio.