Actuality | Science and Bioethics

Verona pro life: if it prevents abortion it is for women!
by

Image results for Alberto ZelgerThe globalist left does, as usual, an ideological use of a wrong law. We support the majority that approved the motion in defense of life and women. (Christ the King)
Of ProVita
Francesca Romana Poleggi
It caused fury and scandal, internal splits in the PD, indignation and dismay on the part of illustrious figures such as the senator Monica Cirinnà, the motion propostadal Advisor Alberto Zelger (in the photo) which is challenging the Municipality of Verona to concrete actions for pregnant women in difficulty, atte a prevent abortion.
Among the antics and masquerades of feminists and those who stubbornly support the point, many call for respect for the law 194.
Well, the law 194 dice, all’art. 1:«The State, the regions and the local authorities, within the scope of its functions and responsibilities, promote and develop social and health services, as well as other initiatives necessary for prevent abortion from being used for the purposes of limiting births». And then to the art. 2 insists that the counseling centers must inform women about their rights and social services that they have at their disposal in the event of an unwanted pregnancy «helping to do overcome the causes that could lead the woman to interrupt of pregnancy. Counselors on the basis of specific regulations or agreements can avail, for the purposes established by law, of the voluntary collaboration of suitable basic social formations and voluntary associations, which can also help difficult motherhood after birth» (art.2, lett.d).
We know well that these parts of the 194 they were put there with the sole purpose of pulling the wool over people's eyes and letting people pass'free and on-demand abortion (that is, regardless of any motivation) up to three months, and much further if there is a danger to the mother's health or if the child is imperfect and must therefore be eliminated eugenically. But beyond intentions, the letter sings: the Zelger motion is - in fact - an act that gives "full implementation" to the unfortunate legislation in question. Read More

Share
Actuality | Science and Bioethics

Global sexuality education: the UN against children
by

gender_ONU_Gaystapo_human-rights_gay-marriage_homosexualism_gender
Of Francesca Romana Poleggi
More and more invasive, The propaganda and diffusion of early sexual education by international organizations is pressing and coercive, which in theory should be devoted to the protection of true human rights, especially the weakest subjects. Few people know, for example, that already in the distant past 1999 UNICEF had published a manual explaining that you can get pleasure from sex with things, the animals, minors or with non-consenting people (cfr.: Sexual and reproductive health workshop for mothers and pregnant adolescents – Program for the prevention and comprehensive care of pregnancy in adolescents, page 89).
We reported at the time a documentary by Family Watch International with a very eloquent title: The war against children: the UN agenda for global sexuality education, the Comprehensive Sex Education (CSE). The CSE is promoted at the United Nations by documents aimed at affirming highly questionable 'sexual rights', especially where they consist of radical and unscrupulous sexual 'education' even for very young children. Many are familiar with the Standards for Sexuality Education in Europe, published by the WHO a few years ago. Among the different ones, serious critical issues include, for example, the claim to educate about sexuality outside and without the knowledge of the family, which is prejudicially considered incompetent in this regard; there is a claim to convey information to children in the age group 0-4 years on “joy and pleasure in touching one's body – early infantile masturbation”. Of course, experts in the world of childhood know well that the act of exploring one's body, also in the genital area, it is natural in children. However, it is not understandable why there should be 'specialists' who instruct children - perhaps 'in groups' - on a practice linked to infantile spontaneity, without taking into account the intimacy of each individual and the different degrees of psychophysical development. Read More

Share