Of Francesca Romana Poleggi
More and more invasive, The propaganda and diffusion of early sexual education by international organizations is pressing and coercive, which in theory should be devoted to the protection of true human rights, especially the weakest subjects. Few people know, for example, that already in the distant past 1999 UNICEF had published a manual explaining that you can get pleasure from sex with things, the animals, minors or with non-consenting people (cfr.: Sexual and reproductive health workshop for mothers and pregnant adolescents – Program for the prevention and comprehensive care of pregnancy in adolescents, page 89).
We reported at the time a documentary by Family Watch International with a very eloquent title: The war against children: the UN agenda for global sexuality education, the Comprehensive Sex Education (CSE). The CSE is promoted at the United Nations by documents aimed at affirming highly questionable 'sexual rights', especially where they consist of radical and unscrupulous sexual 'education' even for very young children. Many are familiar with the Standards for Sexuality Education in Europe, published by the WHO a few years ago. Among the different ones, serious critical issues include, for example, the claim to educate about sexuality outside and without the knowledge of the family, which is prejudicially considered incompetent in this regard; there is a claim to convey information to children in the age group 0-4 years on “joy and pleasure in touching one's body – early infantile masturbation”. Of course, experts in the world of childhood know well that the act of exploring one's body, also in the genital area, it is natural in children. However, it is not understandable why there should be 'specialists' who instruct children - perhaps 'in groups' - on a practice linked to infantile spontaneity, without taking into account the intimacy of each individual and the different degrees of psychophysical development.
In these United Nations documents there is constant reference to 'reproductive rights' and the 'right to sexual health', which – incredibly – surpass, they obscure and cancel the right to life, which should be the first and fundamental human right. In the 2015 the WHO, in the report entitled Sexual health, human rights and the law (Sexual health, human rights and the law), reiterated that 'sexual health' presupposes access to such sexual 'education', and therefore access to contraception and abortion on demand and promotes sexuality understood as a game that gives physical pleasure as an end in itself. The document says that sexual health depends on «[…] possibility of having pleasant and safe sexual experiences, free from coercion, discrimination and violence». They ignore, these 'educators', That the notion of 'sexual intercourse for recreational purposes' implies the objectification of one's own and other people's bodies, and it is therefore the first step towards the exploitation of the other (the 'object woman' so deplored by feminist ideology) with the sole purpose of having 'pleasant' sexual experiences. A philosophy perfectly in line with the most unbridled individualism which degenerates into nihilism and the self-destruction of humanity.
All adults, Indeed, they know as well as sex as an end in itself – without the necessary maturity, without a truly global emotional and sentimental involvement, faithful and forever – be an ephemeral pleasure, which in the long run leaves you deeply disappointed and dissatisfied. And it's easy to understand that, where the use of other people's bodies for one's own pleasure is justified, the weakest subjects are allowed to be overwhelmed. WHO, Furthermore, insists that «
Human sexuality encompasses many different forms of behavior and expression» and that «
acceptance of the diversity of sexual behaviors and their expression contributes to people's general sense of well-being and health». And then it is explained that «
discrimination and inequality play a key role in compromising sexual health. For example, those who are perceived as engaging in socially unacceptable sexual practices, or with socially unacceptable characteristics, like being HIV positive, are unjustly deprived of their right to sexual health».
In short, the variety of sexual relationships and the perfect equalization of every preference, gusto, sexual tendency and practice contributes to people's general sense of well-being and health.
The categories that the law must protect from discrimination and criminalization are:, in particular, sexually active unmarried adolescents, le prostitute, the gigolos, migrants (but what does being a migrant have to do with sexual activity and health?), transgender or intersex people and those who experience homosexual tendencies, who currently suffer from marginalization and stigmatisation, which would compromise their personal health. Truly? Not just the common experience, but scientific research also shows that the opposite is true. Promiscuous sex, and homosexual relationships in particular, they are not healthy at all, given the resurgence of epidemics of sexually transmitted diseases in 'advanced' countries, who disseminate the WHO policies for sexual education of the new generations the most.
It's disconcerting, Then, read that the same Solons who on the one hand preach information and contraception for the prevention of diseases, on the other, they distribute leaflets and 'instruction booklets' in which - in the name of the most unbridled libertarianism - they explain that, if you are HIV positive, it is not necessary to warn the partner or put a condom if the person "doesn't feel up to it"... Another thing to point out is that the WHO document on CSE insists on the obligation for States to update their legislation to remove barriers to access to sexual education, to contraception and abortion. The issuing of «
laws that favor the dissemination of objective and complete sexual education, for everyone».
Instead, they should be repealed.laws that limit women's sexual freedom and adolescents' access to health services - for example, requiring third-party permission – and laws criminalizing certain consensual sexual behaviors». Pedophiles will be happy about it.
Note the truly tenacious insistence on the need - according to these 'educators' - of
keep family out of teenagers' sex lives: any law requiring parental consent to provide sex education, contraceptives and abortion for minors, shall be repealed. Always, All, in the name of what they insist on calling 'human rights' and which - as we have already noted - include the right to every perversion, but not the right to life… The reference is also noteworthy, with applause, ai «
national judges who in different parts of the world have played an important role in overthrowing discriminatory rules», especially in relation to everyone's freedom to live and express their own, fluid gender identity. Without being forced to resort to plastic surgery to change your sex at the registry office, without being forced into divorce, if those who 'changed sex' were married. Those who follow the sad Italian legal and judicial events in this regard know that many of these indications have been implemented here: now he will realize that the script has been written for some time.
The destructive machine driven by the culture of death, aimed at creating Il Mondo Nuovo (Those who have not yet read Aldous Huxley's dystopian novel are strongly advised to do so), it has been in motion for years and advances inexorably. But there is hope? Yes. There is hope, and it is not only linked to the "faith accustomed to triumphs" and to the fact that evil is destined to devour itself. First of all,
the dissemination of correct information, of the truth; exposing these dark maneuvers serves to give that awareness that warns minds and defends them from the slow and subtle brainwashing to which they are continually subjected by the media apparatus subservient to evil.
Secondly, specifically,
we can note with satisfaction that a strong and growing coalition of governments is emerging (from every part of the world) who understood the dangers of Comprehensive Sex Education. Recently, for example, the attempt to include the CSE in the outcome document of the United Nations Commission on Population and Development (
Commission on Population and Development) he failed. On the contrary, in the CPD document there is a paragraph that insists on the principle of subsidiarity: respect for the sovereignty of States and their religious and cultural values. In that assembly, the influence of North America and North-Western Europe is however strong: the reference to abortion and contraception could not be avoided. Ma, especially thanks to the support of African and Central European countries- eastern, there was an opportunity to reiterate the central role of the family in eradicating poverty and hunger, in achieving universal primary education, in promoting women's empowerment, in reducing infant mortality, in improving maternal health and the fight against HIV, malaria and other diseases.
https://www.notizieprovita.it/notizie-dal-mondo/educazione-sessuale-globale-lonu-contro-i-bambini/
