Actuality

The American New World Order is officially dead
by

Of Henry Tougha
The American New World Order is officially dead
Source: Voices from abroad
A mainstream source such as Bloomberg states The American dream of imposing its own system of global control is officially dead. Russia, after recovering from the collapse of the Soviet Union, together with a new power like China, they have escaped US leadership by creating alternative poles of influence. Naturally Bloomberg takes an absolutely favorable and rosy point of view on the new peaceful and collaborative world order that the United States would try to pursue and considers its end negatively, casting the responsibility on the authoritarianism and power aims of China and Russia. In essence, however, this official renunciation of the ambition to integrate these countries under the American empire does not mean peace: according to Bloomberg the consequence will be that the USA will have to commit itself in an increasingly aggressive manner to militarily defend the hitherto consolidated American empire.
at Hal Brands, 27 September 2017
American foreign policy has reached a historic turning point, and here's the surprise: it has little to do with Donald Trump's exhausting and controversial presidency. Read More

Share
Actuality | WORLD CONFLICT

Hitting Putin's Russia to educate the rest of the world (but there is no new cold war)
by
BEYOND PROPAGANDA, IN SEARCH OF THE TRUTH’
In reality there is no Cold War except in the desire of Western democracies to create it (as in the case of the former Russian spy killed in London… but by whom?)
Of Giampaolo Rossi

(AUTOMATIC READING)
Because the Moscow secret services (or Putin himself according to some) they would have decided to eliminate a former Russian spy living in London, handed over by themselves to the English 10 years before and which would have long since ceased all activity?
Per “revenge because the Russians do not forgive traitors”, those who know things explain. But then why didn't they kill him during the years when the spy was a prisoner in Moscow prisons?
And then why do it to 15 days after the presidential elections in Russia which will see Putin win his fourth term and at the moment of maximum tension between Russia and the West, in which Europe and the United States are accusing Moscow of practically everything (in a while’ also the ozone hole)?
And why to delete this “retired spy” they would have poisoned her with a chemical substance identified by British experts as “Novichok”, one of the most lethal nerve agents created and developed in Uzbekistan laboratories during the times of the Soviet Union?
Because the Russians would have left this perfect author's signature to theirs “useless” plot? It wasn't simpler than a gunshot to the head from a hitman or one of those unsuspected road accidents in which the victim unintentionally loses his life in absolutely random circumstances?
And we are sure that this “poison” leads directly to the responsibility of Moscow? Read More

Share