(AUTOMATIC READING)
Because the Moscow secret services (or Putin himself according to some) they would have decided to eliminate a former Russian spy living in London, handed over by themselves to the English 10 years before and which would have long since ceased all activity?
Per “revenge because the Russians do not forgive traitors”, those who know things explain. But then why didn't they kill him during the years when the spy was a prisoner in Moscow prisons?
And then why do it to 15 days after the presidential elections in Russia which will see Putin win his fourth term and at the moment of maximum tension between Russia and the West, in which Europe and the United States are accusing Moscow of practically everything (in a while’ also the ozone hole)?
And why to delete this “retired spy” they would have poisoned her with a chemical substance identified by British experts as “Novichok”, one of the most lethal nerve agents created and developed in Uzbekistan laboratories during the times of the Soviet Union?
Because the Russians would have left this perfect author's signature to theirs “useless” plot? It wasn't simpler than a gunshot to the head from a hitman or one of those unsuspected road accidents in which the victim unintentionally loses his life in absolutely random circumstances?
And we are sure that this “poison” leads directly to the responsibility of Moscow?
QUESTIONS WITHOUT ANSWER
Vil Mirzanyanov is a Russian scientist who participated in the Soviet chemical program before fleeing to the United States in the 1990s, revealing many secrets of the products in that Uzbek laboratory where he worked. In the 2007 published a book that revealed the Soviet chemical programs and also the formulas of this offending substance.
Sul Wall Street Journal, Ralf Trapp, one of the leading international experts on chemical weapons, he recalled how the popularization of this formula “made Novichok available for breeding elsewhere” and that “other countries developed this program”.
With the Skipral case we are at a leap forward: accuse Russia of state terrorism
On the other hand, the British intelligence services have given ample evidence of unreliability and manipulation. It was their reports (combined with those of the CIA) to build the lie of “Saddam's chemical weapons” which led to the invasion of Iraq and the beginning of the process of destabilization of the Middle East. And it was always them (in cahoots with the French) to invent the evidence “humanitarian” who justified the war in Libya and the destruction of a sovereign state, producing the disastrous effects that we are paying for today in terms of immigration and jihadist terrorism.
The story of Sergei Skripal (the poisoned spy) and his daughter Yulia who today struggle between life and death, is destined to remain suspended halfway between the truth that Western governments, the media and the elites who control them impose on the world the unprovability of this truth.
A LEVEL LEAP
Here, however, we are at a leap in level. The accusation against Russia is that of an act of terrorism on British territory. The image of His Majesty's soldiers wandering around the gardens of an English city under chemical attack by a foreign power in anti-bacteriological suits, he is the perfect icon the mainstream needs to scare public opinion and point out Moscow as a danger to the West.
But why accuse Moscow of this clumsy operation on British territory?
A few weeks ago on Bloomberg, National Security expert Eli Lake clarified the objective: if Putin “will continue its killings on European soil should include the designation of Russia as a state sponsor of terrorism”. With very serious repercussions also at the United Nations level.
NEW COLD WAR, WESTERN INVENTION
The reality is that there is no Cold War except in the Western desire to create it. The reasons are obvious.
Today the world is not bipolar but multipolar.
The real enemy for American hegemony and for the West is not Russia (today power halved) but China of which Russia is a secondary partner.
Russia is no longer the Soviet Union, it no longer controls half of Europe and countries in South America and Africa; it is at most a regional power desperately trying to stem American and Western expansionism in Eurasia by legitimately defending its vital interests.
The Warsaw Pact no longer exists and many of the countries that were once Moscow's allies today gravitate into Western orbit; Russia today is a nuclear power but in military terms its strength is a fifth of its past strength and far inferior to that of NATO which is the most terrible global war machine that has ever existed in history.
Putin must pay for the intervention in Syria and the opposition to the projects of the New International Order
Thinking that Russia is about to invade Europe or has an interest in fueling tensions with the West is only the result of induced schizophrenia. The narrative of a new Cold War serves the West to legitimize Russophobia which has its roots in the centuries-old imperial interests of London and which today is combined with the interests of the globalist elite and its immense techno-military apparatus.
WHAT PUTIN PAYS?
The Skipral case and the acceleration induced by Great Britain and France (with less conviction the USA and Germany) to accuse Russia of something yet to be proven seem to be designed to bring tensions with Moscow to an extreme. Tensions whose level has increased in the last two years. Why?
Putin is paying for his intervention in Syria which interrupted the domino effect that began with the Arab Spring and the regime changes imposed in Libya and Egypt.
Putin pays for having fought and defeated Daesh (which before his intervention was spreading with the complicity of its creators, USA and Saudi Arabia) and canceled that Caliphate which was supposed to represent a buffer of preparation for the new Sunni entity to be shared between the Turks and Saudis.
Putin pays for having made clear the transformation of Al Qaeda into “moderate rebels” used by the West as military forces for “proxy war” in Syria and Libya.
Putin pays for having prevented the overthrow of the Assad regime and the division of the Middle East along the Atlantic-Sunni axis that links the USA and Great Britain to the Wahhabi regime and the new Turkish dictatorship.
This is why Putin's Russia must be punished: to educate the rest of the world. Woe to those who oppose the designs of the New World Order imposed by the elite and faithful squires who govern Western democracies.