Actuality | Policy

Harmful sanctions, the prime minister is right to be with Putin
by

Of Massimo Fini
Harmful sanctions, the prime minister is right to be with Putin
Source: Massimo Fini
The debut of the new Italian government in an international forum, the G7 in La Malbaie, Canada, it couldn't be more difficult. Our prime minister, Giuseppe Conte, he was in fact the first and so far the only European leader to have the courage, in his investiture speech to the Senate, to make some reservations on the sanctions that the United States, followed by Europe, they imposed on Russia for occupying Crimea.
There was an immediate refusal from NATO (which as everyone knows is an alliance for the sole use and consumption of the United States) through the declarations of its current and puppet Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg and the US ambassador to the headquarters of the Atlantic Alliance in Brussels, Bailey Hutchison. One of the objections to keep the point about these sanctions is that the laws of international law cannot be violated without being followed by adequate punishment. Ora, if there is a country that in the last twenty years has violated these rules and acted with the utmost contempt towards the UN, which represents all the states of the world and should be their defender, it's really America. When, for example, Serbia is attacked over the Kosovo issue (1999) against the will of the UN is then difficult, having created this precedent, attack Russia for annexing Crimea. Also because there is a substantial difference. Kosovo was outside the American area of ​​influence and very far from its borders, so much so that President Clinton to convince his fellow citizens of the goodness of that aggression, naturally justified in the name of the usual "human rights" ready for any use, he had to take a huge map and a wand, like a master, show them where this mysterious Kosovo was that no one in the States had ever heard of. Russia instead occupied a territory, in the Crimea, which if he really isn't Russian, However, he had always been a Russian speaker. Read More

Share
Actuality | WORLD CONFLICT

Hitting Putin's Russia to educate the rest of the world (but there is no new cold war)
by
BEYOND PROPAGANDA, IN SEARCH OF THE TRUTH’
In reality there is no Cold War except in the desire of Western democracies to create it (as in the case of the former Russian spy killed in London… but by whom?)
Of Giampaolo Rossi

(AUTOMATIC READING)
Because the Moscow secret services (or Putin himself according to some) they would have decided to eliminate a former Russian spy living in London, handed over by themselves to the English 10 years before and which would have long since ceased all activity?
Per “revenge because the Russians do not forgive traitors”, those who know things explain. But then why didn't they kill him during the years when the spy was a prisoner in Moscow prisons?
And then why do it to 15 days after the presidential elections in Russia which will see Putin win his fourth term and at the moment of maximum tension between Russia and the West, in which Europe and the United States are accusing Moscow of practically everything (in a while’ also the ozone hole)?
And why to delete this “retired spy” they would have poisoned her with a chemical substance identified by British experts as “Novichok”, one of the most lethal nerve agents created and developed in Uzbekistan laboratories during the times of the Soviet Union?
Because the Russians would have left this perfect author's signature to theirs “useless” plot? It wasn't simpler than a gunshot to the head from a hitman or one of those unsuspected road accidents in which the victim unintentionally loses his life in absolutely random circumstances?
And we are sure that this “poison” leads directly to the responsibility of Moscow? Read More

Share
Actuality | Non-fiction

The Israeli earthenware vessel among the Western and Eurasian iron vessels
by

This site adheres to ashtags #iostoconassad e #iostoconputin
Of Alastair Crooke
The Israeli earthenware vessel among the Western and Eurasian iron vessels
Source: Aurora site
The recent series of events leads Israel to retreat; the almeno, to a profound existential reflection, on the seventieth anniversary of the foundation. The depth of this rather anxious introspection became explicit in the discussion hosted by Yediot Ahronoth, the most important Israeli newspaper, among six ex-chiefs of the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service. The most direct eruption into this gloomy mood was the declaration to Knesset(parliament) according to which the population between Jordan and the sea was exactly balanced, 6,5 million on each side, between Israelis and Palestinians. Right, demographic equality would have occurred at some point, everyone knew it. It is therefore not a surprise; but it's a slap in the face of reality, nevertheless. These figures were published by the IDF and are therefore difficult to dispute. This moment of reality thus reduces the ability of certain Israelis to persist in the wishful thinking that the Palestinians are much less. This hugely symbolic twist is here, it has arrived. The question of what kind of state Israel will be is no longer theoretical. One of the six former directors of the Mossad, Pardo, answered the question what is it, according to her, the worst threat to Israeli national security?: “The worst threat, it is the fact that between the sea and the Jordan River there are almost identical numbers of Jews and non-Jews. The central problem from 1967 to date it is Israel, for the entire political leadership, it hasn't decided what country to be. We are the only country in the world that has not defined its borders. All governments have avoided it... If the State of Israel does not decide what it wants, in the end there will be a single state between the sea and the Jordan. This is the end of the Zionist vision“. Read More

Share