the western

It's one “new spring” for the Democrats. A compromise between what US progressives were until Hillary Clinton's defeat and what the “new left”, the ecologist and pauperist neo-doctrine of Ocasio Cortez, would like for the future of the donkeys.
When Pete Buttigieg announced he would run in the Democratic primary, political scientists thought momentum might have arrived – a term so dear to American analysts – of the first homosexual elected as president of the United States. Today, after a few weeks, the storytelling built around this figure, so gentle, so elegant and spendable, yes it's a while’ extended. Time did it too, not to mention “really”, a cover: with Pete Buttigieg should win first the preliminary round and then the presidential elections, to take up residence at the White House would be the first gay family in the history of the United States.
It is a political language – communicative which is not uncommon to come across. Some might argue that they do not understand the extraordinary nature of the matter. Julius Caesar did not live near the 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20500, but it was for quite a while’ of time the most important man on the planet and, according to Cicero also the “wife of all husbands”. It would be worth not caring about the sexual behavior of political leaders.
Pete Buttigieg is one of the few leaders, among those present on the mainstream, to present a markedly pro-LGBT personal story. Because it's his experience, also personal, to talk about “new rights”. There is a wedding with a man behind her back, which is still ongoing and which has depended on certain reformist legislation. And then there is a way of conceiving the Catholic faith, which in Italy we would define “adult”, but which in US liberal circles is seen as the only meritorious one: the postmodernist one. The other competitors, those instances, they can only list them among the programmatic priorities or little more. The dream activity of politically correct recorded an increase.
Read More

THE TRAGEDY AT THE BEGINNING OF HOLY WEEK
«With Notre-Dame a part of us burns»: he said as much, according to news agencies, French President Emmanuel Macron during the devastating fire that destroyed the Paris cathedral, symbol of the Gothic architectural style.
What Macron said is undoubtedly true and therefore, at least in theory, shareable, if only it didn't come from a leading exponent of that European political and ideological class that has contributed more than ever in recent decades to setting fire not only to the supporting pillars of Western civilization, but his own spirit.
The historical-artistic tragedy that took place among the fires of Notre-Dame, Indeed, can serve as a useful suggestion to reflect on human and cultural tragedy that is consuming from within, like the flames between the wooden beams of the transept and the nave of the famous Parisian church, the entire Western civilization.
It would be more appropriate to ask, Therefore, why cry on the blackened stones that will remain at Notre-Dame after a few hours of intense and indomitable fire, if you have time, with a violence far superior to that of the largest pyre imaginable, and without any internal or external disturbance, you are not Read More

AN EXAMPLE FOR OTHER GOVERNMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIONS
The debate on bioethics in Norway continues to hold sway within the political scenario. Il Christian People's Party (KrF), after joining the Prime Minister's governing coalition Erna Solberg and having achieved the goal of restricting twin abortions (or embryoreductions), which will therefore no longer be practicable on the basis of the woman's mere request but only after the mandatory opinion of a specific medical commission, obtained the right of veto in the field of genetics and biotechnology to be included in the government contract. This means that the KrF will be able to block amendments to the biotechnology law, now stop in Parliament. Despite this law overall enjoying the favor of the parliamentary majority, composed of all three other parties in government, the new unanimous consent clause introduced in the government contract upsets previous agreements on the topic, e it effectively gives a minority political force such as the Christian People's Party the ability to dictate the law in the field of bioethics.
Specifically, the main effects of the blocking of the law in question, as announced by party leader Kjell Ingolf Ropstad, they will be: the ban on egg donation, the restriction on medically assisted procreation, including for example the ban on extending this practice to singles, and the prohibition of mitochondrial donation. Read More