Make the Risorgimento, not the Resistance

FIFTH COLUMN

by Marcello Veneziani
Thirty years ago he died Augustus of Noce, Gentile philosopher and Catholic on the sidelines. He had just had time to see the fall of the Berlin Wall, but he did not have time to see the transition from the bipolar world to the global world, dominated – as he himself had predicted – by technofinance and permissiveness; and the transformation of communism into a radical mass force, as he had predicted. In '89 there was still the USSR, Europe had not yet been united and Pope Woytila ​​was in vogue. And in our country there was still the first republic with its protagonists.
At that time the Catholic philosopher thought what the task of the coming years should be a new national and European Risorgimento. His reading of the Risorgimento was meta-historical, ideal, platonic; it had little to do with the actual unification process and its contradictions. For him the Risorgimento was a religious category, derived from Resurrection, evoked Gioberti. While the historical Risorgimento, that of Cavour, of Garibaldi and the Savoys, it was indeed an ideal inspiration but conceived as a process of modernization with respect to tradition, a secular if not irreligious movement that was born against the Central Empires of the Throne and the Altar and fell into the "liberal" era of national states and constitutional sovereignties.
For Del Noce the Risorgimento was a true philosophical category, as well as politics; different from both the Revolution and the Restoration. For him, the Risorgimento indicates that nations can only recover in the name of their tradition, “critiquing the historical order from the point of view of an ideal order”. If the revolution aims at the future, he said, the Risorgimento aims at the eternal. Moreover, the formula adopted for Italian sovereignty seemed to correspond to Del Noce's wishes, “by the grace of God and the will of the nation”.
Read More
Share

Fascism, a thousand years ago

Fifth column. Marcello Veneziani.
Like today, a hundred years ago, Absolute Evil came into the world, Eternal Fascism. Curious that diabolical Eternity has a birth certificate: il 23 March of 1919, in Piazza San Sepolcro, in Milan, the Fasci di Combattimento were born. Eternal Fascism had two parents without whom it would not have come into the world: socialism and war (or interventionism). We wouldn't understand fascism without going back to its parents. Fascism is within the history of socialism, as its internal chapter: fascism was its son and stepson, legacy and reaction. If fascism is eternal, the socialism from which it was born and the conflict from which it arose should also be eternal. In reality, historical phenomena are parables: they have a dawn, a peak and a sunset, of which they remain a legacy, traces and memories. Fascism like communism can sometimes resurface or echo but it is not eternal. Historicizing fascism is the only way to understand its meaning, the scope and effects. Read More

Share

L'altra faccia di Bush e la scissione dei tradizionalisti veronesi del 2003

Remembering, with this splendid article by Marcello Veneziani, than some self-styled traditionalist from Verona, godson first of Alleanza Cattolica and then of T.F.P. (six or seven left, in truth, but still too many) he considered this gentleman a sort of new Charlemagne, placing, cosi, the first foundations of the great split of 2003, of which we were the main authors.

Read More

Share

Point of no return

Of Marcello Veneziani

Penelope's web. It is woven during the day, it unravels in the evening. Or if you prefer, another state abortion is announced. After three months, Cottarelli's undertaking appears difficult, who also seemed to have left with all the right blessings, except for one negligible detail, the sovereign people. That annoying little charm there, called Italy. And yet he is still at sea, and you run with the headlights off in the night along a Roman road full of potholes and ambushes. The Weaver, Mattarella, he lost the clue, he made glaring mistakes, perhaps ill-advised, he managed to blow the pan first, then the embers and now he risks being left with the match in hand while the spread grows with panic. He no longer knows which way to turn, the abyss advances, specters of elections are stirring in the sun.
Whatever happens we know that we have now achieved the point of no return. An unbridgeable abyss has been dug between the Single Bloc of Power and the whole of Italy. The Single Block includes he Pd, the Great Press, Big Finance, the Caste, the Palaces, starting from the Quirinale… Then there's everything else. Which is not just the Square, the Grillino and Northern League people, the militants, but also the many refractory ones, the independents, the bilateral disgusted, the many who live, they think, they work outside the Single Block.
A was being born for the first time absolute minority government, enactment of the Single Block, in spite of the vote and Italy. Other times the technical governments of the Palace had at least one fig leaf in Parliament. This time there isn't even that, even the Democratic Party, which was the sole shareholder of reference, understood that it was better to withdraw, also because Cottarelli only announces cuts, tears and blood. At the beginning Mattarella had also discarded the hypothesis of a centre-right government that had a relative majority in parliament. And instead he then launched an oligarchic government, the PD-Potentates coalition. Read More

Share