Bergoglio, the conciliars and the shame of tradition

Of Matthew Castagna

Per traditionalist part, now reduced to those (clergy and lay people) who do not recognize the “conciliar hierarchy” as legitimate, there is a certain reluctance to the loud objection of Bergoglio, compared to its predecessors, because it might seem that the crisis and problems arise with him, almost getting the result of “absolve” everyone else, as a consequence.
I believe that it is not wrong to consider it limited to attack only the Argentine chemical expert for his bizarre or heretical expressions, because whoever wants (and must) having an overall vision must begin the overview of what happened at an ecclesial level and therefore, harshly criticize documents and people, at least since the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965). Announced by Roncalli, continued and finished by Montini, this meeting laid the foundations for a genetic mutation, on the human level, of the official Church. Not being able to, but, It transforms but is handed down, as the Mystical Body of Christ is only in continuity with Its Founder, we are forced to believe that the Vatican 2 was not a Council of the Roman Catholic Apostolic Church, as much as a Council of the “Counter-Church”, composed of fallen clerics, infiltrated by liberal and social-communist ideology, theologically modernists (“modernism is the synthesis of all heresies” – Saint Pius X). Prepared for some time in the lodges, found fertile ground in Roncalli, While His Holiness Pius XII he refused to call it, since he had grasped the seditious will of the so-called innovators. All of Pope Pacelli's predecessors had, moreover, energetically rejected the embrace of modernity, understood as the adaptation to sins against God and against others, always condemned, but passed off as mercy and charity (sic!). Read More

Share

Luigi Bisignani at IL TEMPO: In the book Veritas

 
Image results for in libro veritas
E’ Seplenist, but his observations are sobering.
Of Luigi Bisignani

The Vatican turmoil in black and white (and the cardinals' desire for rebellion)

Dear director, once again it is a book that shakes the unadorned rooms of Santa Marta, where Pope Bergoglio has been staying for five years. It is a profound reflection on the Pontificate, not a scandalous book, which comes out on the fifth anniversary of the election of Pope Bergoglio and seems to gather the discontent of an increasingly disoriented curia and episcopate. To write it,not a reporter looking for scandals but a thoroughbred journalist, Mauro Mazza, for years at the top of Rai publications. “Bergoglio and prejudice” (Publisher Pages,210 pages) it was written on the original basis of articles and occasional notes, subsequently assembled or, more often, expanded and rewritten. A book written by a courageous Catholic that leaves the reader full of questions. In his merciless overview he touches on all the most controversial points of this five-year period,from divorced people to homosexuals, from openings in foreign policy, especially towards the Orthodox of Moscow, up to the anomalies of some centers of power,as Communion and Liberation. With the curiosity of a reporter and the vision of a historian, Mazza doesn't believe they can arrive, but it doesn't exclude either, possible resignation of the Pope. "It was profoundly different", writes Mazza,«the situation experienced with Benedict XVI. It was a sensational and unexpected resignation. Yet his renunciation, even with so few precedents in the two thousand year history of the Church, was considered realistic". Read More

Share